Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone seen the bank leverage numbers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:22 AM
Original message
Anyone seen the bank leverage numbers?
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 01:24 AM by TwixVoy


The banks are WAY over leveraged.

Citi: 46.7
Bank of America: 31.7
Chase: 25.8

These numbers mean that, for example, for every ONE dollar Citi has to its name it OWES 46.7 dollars.

So say you were personally in the same situation as an individual as Citi. That would mean that - for example - you had $20,000 to your name.... but you would owe your creditors $934,000.

Now keep in mind these banks are dealing with BILLIONS of dollars here..... And these banks are actually LOSING money at this time. They are NOT bringing in more money than they are putting out. Therefore these numbers are actually going to increase from here. We are up shit creek with out a paddle folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. While Citi has appeared to releveraged themselves
The rest of the major banks seem to have bucked the trend and started the painful process of de-leveraging. Goldman was leveraged at over 33:1 much of 2008, with Wells Fargo close behind. Nationalization is probably the only way to keep Citi afloat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. There are people with $2,000
Who wouldn't think anything about owing $93,400 on their home - if that's what we're talking about here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. The rules changed a few years ago (guess when) they can be 32X debt to equity
or it might be 36X. It used to be 12X

I saw Cenk on The Young Turks talk about this-I checked it out and he was right

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. A 2004 SEC Ruling changed it from what was effectively
11.5:1 to (about) 34:1

If these numbers are correct that the WSJ graph gives, then Citi is insolvent. Their stock price has dropped 30% in the past week and a half, costing them billions in what little equity they have left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Right
thanks. I looked but couldn't find it. Long NYT article a few weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. When the leverage numbers changed, how could they *not* know that
the result would be several years of boom economy (as money is effectively printed by the banks), and then a terrible day of reckoning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Young Turks (can't find the video) had a great analysis of this
Cenk compared not only the ratio changing but that the banks were basically paid (fees etc.) to bet more. To throw more money on the table. The more they bet the more they individually made. It was a blackjack anology wherein someone pays you $20 every time you bet $5 win or lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. They were told nothing could go wrong, in a sense
Moodys and Fitch and S&P told the SEC that investment banks essentially hedged enough risk that tripling their allowed debt to equity ratio would result in little (if any) more exposure to risk than the current system under 10:1, due to credit-default swap proliferation and the instruments that allowed banks to buy what were in essence insurance policies against each other. Their computer models showed them no problems, but as we all know now, the models were flawed. They didn't take into consideration a downturn in the economy. In regards to Moody's and S&P's real estate computations that should have protected investors better against sub-prime mortgages and mortgage backed securities, when asked about their models, the answers were revealing. The rating agencies said their models for real estate couldn't "handle" home prices falling. They only saw them going up, and if they didn't fall but just stagnate, the whole system would collapse (as we all know it did). The SEC, the rating agencies, mortgage brokerages, the whole system is completely fucked in the head and needs a great culling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent post, points out how bankrupt the entire banking system is
It's being propped up by the FED and propaganda and the hope that it won't collapse. The problem is it has already collapsed, nobody trusts the rip off muthafckers with their constantly changing interest rates, late fees, fictitious charges, derivative trades, fraudulent ratings agencies, criminal real estate divisions, constantly scheming and lying managements, filthy rich and greedy CEOs, fraudulent investment firms, outsourcing and overseas holdings, tax-evasion and bailout-stealing bullshit crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Brethren Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. "We are up shit creek with out a paddle folks."
You are sooooo right!!!

And that doesn't even take in account the disaster our job market is in, workers are losing jobs left and right - including those who have been with a company for 21 yrs., companies are either closing or forced to find "alternative" ways to keep afloat, we're badly losing and have all but lost the battle over foreign-product competition (a.k.a. imports) resulting in more American monies ending up in foreign economies/jobs then ours, along with record breaking national deficit, and so on.

It was also reported in the news within the past few weeks that banks are also pulling the rug out on business owners, (particularly affecting smaller businesses) by not allowing them a loan that they were already approved for due to financial uncertainties even tho. businesses were planning on using those loans to help them pay bills....including pay-rolls, etc. Some businesses are also finding their credit with banks frozen altogether. The domino affect is already taking place.

I've been trying to encourage folks to keep what monies that they can in their banks to help create some stability (w/ the banking industry). However, many people I know, including friends who lost jobs in the past 2 mths., are desperate to pay bills and expenses, thus draining their accounts. Btw, the media is still calling this a very bad "recession". If it keeps up at this rate, it will quickly be a current "depression".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. 60 Minutes- there is about to be another disaster in COMMERCIAL real estate
we haven't even gotten there yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shintao Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hmmm, I prefer to look at like this..........
For every dollar I invested in Citibank stock on Monday, I will get back 46 times that amount when Obama bails them out. Once again folks, if you have a few thousands to play with, now is the time to buy - because the US government cannot afford to let these people go down. Citibank is the credit cards and poor getting poorer people will use credit this coming year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You don't seem to understand
Most of these banks are screwed in both domestic AND foreign investments. Do you REALLY believe the US has the cash to bail out the entire worlds banking system? And do you really believe the US dollar would be worth a thing after?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC