Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we want to get Universal Healthcare in this country, we need the support of large corporations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:25 PM
Original message
If we want to get Universal Healthcare in this country, we need the support of large corporations
Many industries in this country are having trouble financially due to the increasingly-expensive cost of healthcare and pensions. Our current system has been in place more or less since the immediate post-war years, when large corporations and unions managed to make a deal whereby the company would give lifetime pensions and assume the brunt of healthcare costs. Unfortunately, it has gotten to the point where this system is no longer manageable. Now, with companies like Ford suffering record losses (with healthcare and pensions being a factor: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-j-weiner/hey-nyt-fords-problem-i_b_25153.html )
it makes sense for companies to want to get rid of their pension and healthcare responsibilities. This is being done through means such as 401K's, forcing employees to pay more out of their pocket, and removal of the benefits altogether via bankruptcy (as the airlines are doing.) However, by having single payer healthcare, workers can keep generous insurance, AND companies will be more profitable in not needing to pay for such expensive benefits.
Toyota, for example, chose Ontario for a new RAV-4 plant over Alabama and Mississippi, with universal healthcare being a major reason (in addition to the higher education level in Ontario...which says a lot of AL and MS, where people will refuse to pay higher property taxes, even when it's actually needed to finance schools!)
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/business/050630/b0630102.html

At the same time, the CEO's of the Canadian units of GM, Ford, and Daimler-Chrysler have all given support to Canada's healthcare system:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/11/21/16411/770



Unfortunately, "HillaryCare" and 1994 scared the shit out of members of our party, and ever since, many have been too timid, for fear of another Harry & Louise ad blitz. While the same special interests are in place to launch another anti-Universal Healthcare campaign, the state of our private healthcare system is much worse than it was in 1993, with millions of more people uninsured (about 40 million) with many more receiving poor-quality healthcare. In addition, if we can get the likes of the auto industry and the airlines on our side, then we can counter the insurance lobby and erase the "socialized medicine" stigma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're being hurt by this just as much as Joe and Mary Shit Taxpayer are.
That's why the auto industry is losing business to Canada and other countries. Ford doesn't have to pay for healthcare in Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It boggles my mind about why they don't come out and support UC
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 04:39 PM by Ignacio Upton
Their support would be crucial in persuading some of the more corporate-friendly Democrats (and possibly a handful of moderate Republicans, like Specter, Snowe and Colins) to vote for UC.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The Nation had an article about this a while back; late 2005
IIRC.

It said that many medium-large companies are waking up to this as a way to compete with the Humunga-Mega-WalMart guys and those that have realized this are becoming pretty enthusiastic about the idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stupid's idea of taxing healthcare benefits as income
for both FICA and OASDI has got to be scaring them even more. The penny on a dollar tax credit for individually purchased insurance will be inadequate for workers, to put it mildly. However, that tax credit will probably be all the justification the corporations need to dump employee health care entirely onto the backs of employees---without giving them commensuate raises in pay, of course.

This will work because the dreaded word "socialism" will look much better compared to the free market health care system designed by and for insurance companies, geared to deny nearly everyone who works for a living actual health care.

The bad part is that it will kill a lot of people before the dimwits get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This reminds me of when Bush wanted to cut SS benefits for everyone
above about $20,000-$30,000 per year incomes. He wanted to turn SS into welfare through means testing, and wants to do similar shit with healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He doesn't understand that Ins. Cos. refuse to cover a lot of people. Tax breaks don't help that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Exactly
but as long as you don't have jock itch, you'll be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. We already pay for Wal-Mart's crappy coverage through our tax revenue anyway.
Why shouldn't they just make it hones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No, half of bankruptcies are tied to health care/ins. costs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Make America Competitive Again: Get Healthcare Off the Back of Business.
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 06:51 PM by aquart
Every other major western nation has national healthcare, a guarantee to all its citizens. As a result, their families are less stressed and better able to devote themselves to work, family, being good citizens without the fear: What if I get sick? What if I get hurt?

Healthcare isn't a "social" issue. It is a vital economic and national security issue. The health of the American people will dictate how well we deal with the realities of the future. The cost of healthcare is currently dictating who will be hired...valuable potential employees are being lost to petty, treatable inconveniences. Valuable people with much to contribute are being shunted into a no-man's-land of stress, unemployment, and fear.

We have to decide, do we want every American contributing to this nation's greatness at their fullest capacity...or do we want to make it so impossible for many good people to work that they instead become burdens on society? THAT's when healthcare becomes a "social" issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC