Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good TARP Transparency Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 01:46 PM
Original message
Good TARP Transparency Amendment
http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/01/15/good-tarp-transparency-amendment/

Rep. Tim Walz introduced an amendment to the second round of TARP - the economic recovery funds aka the bailout - that would require the Treasury Department to post online reports on how funds are being spent. Here’s part of a letter of support Walz is circulating around Capitol Hill:

H.R. 384 requires that institutions that received assistance under the TARP or that receive assistance in the future file at-least quarterly public reports on their use of the funds.

My amendment would require the Treasury Department to make those reports publicly available online, so that the public may have easy access to them.

Americans have the right to know how their money has been spent and what financial institutions have done with their bailout funds. Yet the operations of the TARP have been insufficiently transparent and accountable. While the public has spent an enormous amount of money providing assistance to financial institutions, we know far too little about what these institutions did with the money.

More at the link above -- including a pdf of the amendment, which may be voted on TODAY.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd prefer to not disburse anymore taxpayer funds to private equity. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We're not going to get that, so this is the next best thing.
However, I too would either like to get something for the money or not have it given/loaned at all.

Considering that BushCo* wanted to hand over the entire Social Security pot to Wall St., we're getting off easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC