Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US home foreclosures spiked 81 percent in 2008 despite efforts to slow the "tsunami,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 02:30 AM
Original message
US home foreclosures spiked 81 percent in 2008 despite efforts to slow the "tsunami,"
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hWgydhvYBQ0DuLD9f2beRxDuz2fg

Saccacio said the big jump in December foreclosure activity was "somewhat surprising" given the moratoria on foreclosures by both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and programs from some of the major lenders and loan servicers aimed at delaying foreclosure actions against distressed homeowners.

"Clearly the foreclosure prevention programs implemented to date have not had any real success in slowing down this foreclosure tsunami," he said.

Nevada, Florida, Arizona had the highest state foreclosure rates in 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. There were no real efforts. Token pretend efforts.
While they looted the treasury for a last minute bank-buying spree on our dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. What fraction of these are "walk aways"?
In several states with high foreclosure rates, CA, AZ, NV, FL, the homeowner can walk away from a mortgage. The mortgage holder can only get back whatever it can by foreclosing the house.

For example, suppose the homeowner bought a house for $400K with no money down. In today's market is is maybe worth $300K. So the homeowner is $100K "under water".

It is to the homeowners advantage to stop paying the mortgage, live there as long as possible until evicted, and let the mortgage company take the property.

The mortgage company cannot go after the homeowner's other assets, either other houses, business investments, bank and brokerage accounts, etc., and cannot force the homeowner into bankruptcy.

The homeowner would have to be pretty stupid to go along with continuing to pay some high, reset rate on an adjustable rate mortgage instead of getting out of the mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC