Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Underplayed Story of the Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:06 PM
Original message
Underplayed Story of the Day
Underplayed Story of the Day
Posted by Karen Tumulty

http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/13/underplayed-story-of-the-day-3/


We have argued here before that fixing the FDA should be at the top of Barack Obama's priority list. This story--easy to miss back on A14 of the New York Times--underscores why:

An official at the Food and Drug Administration overruled front-line agency scientists and approved the sale of an imaging device for breast cancer after receiving a phone call from a Connecticut congressman, according to internal agency documents.

The legislator's call and its effect on what is supposed to be a science-based approval process is only one of many of accusations in a trove of documents regarding disputes within the agency's office of device evaluation.


The larger issue is this:

Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women and Families, said the Bush administration had “finally made the device approval process so meaningless that it's intolerable to the scientists who work there.” Ms. Zucker, a longtime critic of the agency's device approval process, particularly as it relates to breast implants, added, “Virtually everything gets approved, no matter what.”

The F.D.A. has a three-tiered approval process for medical devices that, depending on their newness or complexity, requires varying amounts of proof.

A growing chorus of critics contends that the agency requires few devices to complete the most rigorous of these reviews and instead allows most devices to be cleared with minimal oversight. In 2007, 41 devices went through the most rigorous process, compared with 3,052 that had abbreviated reviews.


Original story here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/health/policy/13fda.html?ref=health
In F.D.A. Files, Claims of Rush to Approve Devices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can't we just do all of our testing on the Bush Family?
Obama's got alot of fixin to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I really hate to break it to you, but it is WE who have a lot of fixin' to do.
It is WE the PEOPLE who must lead by demanding action, or running for office to represent and enact the changes that WE the people want.

If you're waiting for a "leader" to make the change, you've got a long wait ahead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. This whole thing pisses me off.
All the GOP had to do was follow the law. They didn't have to design the food testing system, or put it in place, they just had to follow the system that already existed.

No, instead they gutted a program that proved it's worth for decades.

This is why no one can trust a republican again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC