Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney: It ‘Always Aggravated Me’ That The NYT Won A Pulitzer For Exposing Warrantless Wiretapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:35 PM
Original message
Cheney: It ‘Always Aggravated Me’ That The NYT Won A Pulitzer For Exposing Warrantless Wiretapping
Source: Think Progress

On Dec. 16, 2005, the New York Times published an article by James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, revealing that President Bush had secretly authorized the NSA to “eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States…without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying.” The blockbuster article, which exposed one of the Bush administration’s biggest secrets, was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting in 2006.

Discussing the wiretapping program on Bill Bennett’s radio show today, Vice President Cheney called the program “important,” adding that it “always aggravated” him that the Times was rewarded for its reporting:

CHENEY: What happened then was they had the information we had, they knew how we were doing it, they knew what we were producing through that process. But then when — Nancy Pelosi, for example, was part of that group. But then it became public. The New York Times broke the story I think in December of ‘05, won the Pulitzer for it, which always aggravated me.

With his gripes over the New York Times’ Pulitzer, Cheney joins the list of conservatives, including Bennett, who have attacked the decision to reward those who revealed the secret program:

- “They win Pulitzer Prizes - I don’t think what they did was worthy of an award - I think what they did was worthy of jail,” — radio host Bill Bennett




Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/2009/01/13/cheney-nyt-pulitzer/



Listen here:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/01/13/cheney-nyt-pulitzer/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pissed that you got exposed, Dick?
It's not their fault you guys were doing something illegal. They were doing what the media should be doing - exposing government stupidity and coverups to the citizens of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well eat shit, Dick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. and yet, according to some crawl on cnn earlier, obama is supposed to LEARN from darth cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess that makes us even
I think everything he did was worthy of jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Did I ever tell you that you are my Fav?
What makes me even more angry is that the NY Times hid this until after the 2004 election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrs_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. i'm always aggravated
that modern medicine is good enough to keep this bastard going...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. We had a Third World White House for eight years. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Braggadocio shows me that these criminals will be protected by the elite rulers. n/t
Edited on Tue Jan-13-09 03:53 PM by balantz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was aggravated, too, Mr. Cheney
Because the Times had this story for more than a year before they ran it in December 2005. If the Times had run the story a year earlier (in time for the 2004 election), you might be sitting in a cell somewhere right now instead of figuring out what to take and what to burn as you vacate your office.

You'd better hope that Dr. King was wrong, or that the arc of the universe bends slowly. Of course, I'm guessing that just one day of skipping your meds, and you'd slip into a nice peaceful coma and be gone within hours. Which is more of an exit strategy than you or Chimpy McCokespoon ever had for Afghanistan or Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dick thinks he has the right to violate the Constitution at will, and nobody has the right
to speak up about it.

Why isn't this traitor in prison yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. And it always will aggrivate Deadeye Dick that Freedom of the Press is a right guaranteed
by the Constitution.

"It's just a goddamned piece of paper!" GWB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wait a minute, is what he is saying is the NYT knew all the time?!?
But didn't break it until it was politically viable?

Is that right, is that what he is claiming?

I don't know if that is true or not, but if so, they probably don't deserve the Pulitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They withheld it to avoid "influencing" the 2004 re-installation...
of the puppet boy. Geez guys, it was just the Constitution that they were using to wipe their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biermeister Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. It always aggravated me that Dick wasn't impeached!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. "I think what they did was worthy of jail" - that's the repuke M.O. - jail the messengers, not the
criminals who broke the laws - oh hey, that's Cheneyfudd, himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC