Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An online petition (Quincy Jones) asking for a Secretary of the Arts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:01 PM
Original message
An online petition (Quincy Jones) asking for a Secretary of the Arts
I can't tell you how strongly I support this. Please take a moment to sign if you agree. Thank you.


http://www.petitiononline.com/esnyc/petition.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. signed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you!
Imagine the world of higher test scores, less crime, and more happiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, yeah, I signed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, wow! Thanks for posting.
antigop--stong supporter of the Arts and would have gone insane the last 8 years if it weren't for live theater and music
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was just wondering about this the other day. Very important and
I think Quincy would be just the man to help in this endeavor. Glad to sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeewee08 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Done:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. thanks for posting. This important. That stimulus plan should have large sums for art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm going to be a contrarian, here. I hate government art.
Government art is propaganda. It's also ugly. Look at that piece of shit WW2 Memorial--it looks, for all the world, like the GERMANS won. Why not? They built the monstrosity.

I like private foundations that support the arts. If the government can give these foundations some sort of advantage, that might be nice. If governments can provide funding so school districts can hire art and music and dance teachers, great.

But I don't think governments should weigh in on what "art" is anymore than they should get in bed with religions. It's just too close a relationship.

Fire away....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. refuted:
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 05:02 PM by maxsolomon


a minister of culture wouldn't be about the production of public art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Not really. A Minister of Culture would be WORSE than a Secretary of Arts.
What's your point with the pic? The only thing the taxpayers funded was the COMPETITION to pick the design. The memorial fund is soliciting donations to build the memorial center to go with that memorial, though: http://www.vvmf.org/index.cfm?SectionID=51

I remember the controversy over that memorial clearly.

The vets hated the fact that the artist was...gasp...ASIAN...and they wanted realistic representations, like a bronze soldier or something. The acrimony was EXTREME.

A panel (not an individual) from the NEA (National Endowment for the Arts · an independent federal agency) voted on that design. And it wasn't paid for by the taxpayers. All we ponied up was the expenses to publicize the competition, and a place to put it...

http://arts.endow.gov/about/40th/vietnam.html

I like the NEA--I think that's MORE than enough, though.

I shudder to think what sort of "Minister of Culture" or "Secretary of Art(s)" Bush might have selected.

If art is to be "political," it should be the personal political expression of private citizens. An NEA panel is one thing--an individual directing the course of "art" in America is too Soviet for my tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. the point of the picture is that not all public art is bad
that's it.

i'd merely like to see the arts recognized as important in america instead of useless frippery to be tossed aside during value engineering. it has cabinet level status in multiple european democracies, and in holland & scandinavia, design is a major export that is fully supported by the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. We should increase NEA funding then--not put an Art Propagandist in the cabinet.
or in a cabinet-level position.

We should increase direct funding to states for art, music and dance classes in the public schools, so they can hire more teachers to bring these subjects to children starting in grammar school--not hire another fat-cat, limousine riding, administration official in an already-bloated government to prance around and "act busy." Screw the cheerleading--first I look at the purse. FUND IT, don't hire some asshole to TALK about it.

A lot of European democracies have "make work" jobs too. And we HAVE an NEA, so we aren't having to deal with the opinions of just one asshole representing "art" to our own nation and the world. Read all about 'em: http://www.nea.gov/

I just can't accept the concept of "Lee Greenwood, Minister of Culture," or "Marie Osmond, Secretary of Arts."

It's offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Some public art may be propoganda
But have you heard about some of the public arts projects during the 1930s? What about the Northwest School?

It's not just visual arts either, I imagine. Did you know that the original transcripts from the Salem Witchcraft Trials were transcribed as a WPA project? This, in turn, led to the first scholarly treatment of the subject by an author named Marion Starkey who wrote a book called, "The Devil in Massachusetts" - a book read with interest by Arthur Miller, who then wrote "The Crucible". That, in turn, helped bring about the end of McCarthyism.

I also can't agree that all public art is bad. Look at the Vietnam War Memorial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Of course I have. I have/had relatives who benefitted from WPA.
Not all WPA projects were "art" either. Digging ditches, doing forestry work, or transcribing witch trials (or marriage records in Illinois, for that matter) are not "art." They're WORK.

That said, the art projects that the government funded were STILL propaganda. And did you know that the government CONSTRAINED some of those projects?

Keep the government AWAY from the arts. That's the best bet.

It's all very well and good when we agree with it. But picture the Bush Administration "Arts" Department in all its glory. It is an ugly thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I think literature counts as art, and if transcribing public records leads to art
that's a good thing.

I do understand your point. But I think that government arts funding could, for example, extend to art and music programs in the schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I don't have a problem with lump sum grants to states for art programs.
But there the involvement of the government ends.

My beef is with the "Secretary of Art." And any "direction" about art or arts coming down from on high from Washington, DC.

We say, wow Quincy Jones...gee, he'd be COOOOOOL in that gig! Yay, swell!!!

But would we want to see eager guitar playing Mike Huckabee in that job? Or Ted Nugent? Is your skin crawling yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't think Nugent would be pushing for it anyway
but I take your point that we don't want government interference or art as propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Arts and culture are a $165 million industry in my area. Very, very important.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Better things to spend money on....
Edited on Thu Jan-08-09 04:24 PM by Cid_B
Any idiot with a blowtorch and astigmatism .....

A whoopdeedoo award for anyone who knows that quote without google.




edited: added first google image that came up under modern art sculpture

http://photos.vequias.com/d/4581-2/Modern+Art+Sculpture.JPG


edit: x2 God damn typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. WAY COOL SCULPTURE!
Would you be so kind to post where more info about it may be found? Reminds me of Mikado sticks and paper clips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Google... modern art sculpture...
Its the first image that came up. To each his own I guess... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Forgive me. Old Tante K. still has an interest in da yung'uns expressions.
I found the image but perhaps due to my lightweight skills, was unable to find the artist's name or any commentary on the work other than photographic specs. I find the piece compelling and am just curious what its creator was on about. So SHOOT ME! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Great sculpture!! thanks for posting
Who is the artist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. great idea! done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Absolutely!
Done! That would be great. Art is so undervalued in this country. :( It really is an asset to other areas of education as well as being important in its own right! Thank you for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. We already have a National Endowment for the Arts
I should know, I worked there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Signed!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. A Cabinet-level Department of the Arts?
There are too many cabinet-level departments as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. I vote for Aretha Franklin for first lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. saturday kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. How about a secretary of Sports/Athletics/Fitness?
We really do not need a secretary of the Arts. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. eliminate the military and the CIA, fund the arts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC