Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Author Of Defense Of Marriage Act Now Thinks It's Time For His Law To Get The Boot (LAT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:18 AM
Original message
Author Of Defense Of Marriage Act Now Thinks It's Time For His Law To Get The Boot (LAT)
Today’s News
Wedding blues
The author of the federal Defense of Marriage Act now thinks it’s time for his law to get the boot – but for political reasons, not in support of gays.

By Bob Barr
January 05, 2009 in print edition A-13

..................

I’ve wrestled with this issue for the last several years and come to the conclusion that DOMA is not working out as planned. In testifying before Congress against a federal marriage amendment, and more recently while making my case to skeptical Libertarians as to why I was worthy of their support as their party’s presidential nominee, I have concluded that DOMA is neither meeting the principles of federalism it was supposed to, nor is its impact limited to federal law.

In effect, DOMA’s language reflects one-way federalism: It protects only those states that don’t want to accept a same-sex marriage granted by another state. Moreover, the heterosexual definition of marriage for purposes of federal laws — including, immigration, Social Security survivor rights and veteran’s benefits — has become a de facto club used to limit, if not thwart, the ability of a state to choose to recognize same-sex unions.

Even more so now than in 1996, I believe we need to reduce federal power over the lives of the citizenry and over the prerogatives of the states. It truly is time to get the federal government out of the marriage business. In law and policy, such decisions should be left to the people themselves.

.....................

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/05/opinion/oe-barr5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, Bob "I'm on my 2nd wife!" Barr...
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 11:26 AM by Vickers
Edit: he's actually on his THIRD wife.

:wtf:

Nice family values, HYPOCRITE!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. How many times has Barr been married?
He apparently needed a lot of defending. Up yours, you bigoted piece of slime (meaning Barr, not anyone here at DU).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Barr is still desperate to be noticed
So he sees an opportunity for face time.

Guess he thinks he has another whack at the presidency in 4 years? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too little too late
What he did has caused so much damage, I don't know that I give a rat's ass what Bob Barr thinks.

Come to think of it, nothing he does interests me. He's filth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. i hate that numb-fuck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC