Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ms. Palin's Pro-contraception message: "Teenagers need to prevent pregnancy to begin with"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:32 AM
Original message
Ms. Palin's Pro-contraception message: "Teenagers need to prevent pregnancy to begin with"
The statement from the governor's office also quotes Bristol Palin, saying the 18-year-old "obviously discourages" teen pregnancy.

Teenagers need to prevent pregnancy to begin with -- this isn't ideal. But I'm fortunate to have a supportive family which is dealing with this together. Tripp is so perfectly precious; we love him with all our hearts. I can't imagine life without him now.

http://www.adn.com/palin/story/639506.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. the All-American Idiot
at least retards have a valid excuse for being slow, this moron is a real whack job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I object to your term "retard" and comparing people with, presumably, Down syndrome with
Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. True... the use of the word is a bit insensitive
Edited on Thu Jan-01-09 12:52 PM by fascisthunter
especially in regards to Palin the right wing nutcase. my apologies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thank you -- I accept your apology.
She's obnoxious enough without having to smear other people. A good 2009 to you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Same to You... I Tried Editing my Post but Time had already Elapsed
I should know better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It's ingrained in a lot of people's vocabulary...I just try to point it out when I see it.
Edited on Thu Jan-01-09 01:01 PM by ogneopasno
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. That could be taken as pro abstinence as well.
It could be taken either way, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Imagine if Palin' had a (D) behind her name...the rightwingnuttery would
be foaming and frothing at the mouth over her evil wicked ways.







Hypocrisy; it's the rightwing way of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. With a condom, maybe?
:shrug:

More effective than whatever YOU were using!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps Bristol should have named the boy
Ivan Ulysses David. Could call him IUD for short.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The "Ivan" part certainly works.
After all, she can see Russia from her mom's house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. I guess reality hasn't set in yet...
and won't, for quite some time.

I'm referring to her nauseating gushing about how the baby is "perfectly precious" blah, blah, blah.

Yeah...newborn babies are all "perfectly precious" when they're sleeping 20 hours a day.

Wait till he starts teething...crawling around and poking forks into electrical outlets...trying to flush whole rolls of TP down the toilet....screaming, crying, throwing full bowls of spaghetti across the room, and all the other stuff kids are likely to do.

Reality, baby...


They may be "working their butts off" now, but the REAL work involved in being a parent hasn't even started yet. It just seems to me that they're almost glorifying the whole thing...not the kind of thing people want to do when there are so many young women out there who think that having a baby (when they're just babies themselves) will make their lives complete.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Or wait until the medical bills and other
expenses start rolling in, like daycare since they are working and going to school. Or they find out (after they are married) that Levi makes $100 a year over the limit for their WIC program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Problem solved - sell another baby picture for $300,000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Oops, I forgot about them pimping their baby like that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Nah, they won't need daycare
They can just get Grandma Sarah to tote the kid around at the state's expense, much like she does with her current brood.

And, BTW, if Levi really is in an apprenticeship program, did you all know that people in that program can apply for UNemployment?? They don't get paid for their "classtime" which can run from 20-some to 36 weeks. They get paid a percentage of a "jouneyman's fee" depending on how many years they have spent in the program. In his case, that would be about 3 months now. All together, they have to put in 8,000 HOURS and several YEARS of being an apprentice before they become an electrican.

Now...as someone who has a baby to support and supposedly engaged, ready to start a life with the mother of that baby, is that the wisest "job" to pick..one where you can make unemployment and go weeks on end with no check??
Read all the details about an electrician apprenticeship program, paying attention to the fine print where it says applicants have to already have their GED..NOT in the middle of getting it.

http://www.jobs.state.ak.us/apprentice/electrical-brochure.pdf

Does Palin wish to make another statement from her office..maybe downgrading Levi's job as a grunt and not an apprentice? or does she wish to say "yes, the GED requiremment was waived for Levi"?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Don't do it even though it's wonderful and I'm famous."
Don't they have enough money to BUY Bristol a clue?? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, "just say no" seemed to have failed in this instance
And since Sarah Palin isn't a complete imbecile (I heard that on the teevee, so it must be true), she's clearly referring to other methods of preventing teenage pregnancy. Isn't she? I'm sure the stalwarts of the Fourth Estate will tirelessly ferret out the true meaning of Gov. Palin's words, since if she's advocating for something other than abstinence for teen-agers, that would be a significant break with the prevailing wisdom of the Republican party.

Anyone want to advise me whether or not I should hold my breath waiting for a reporter to ask the pertinent question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, the deal is that saying "No, No, Don't Stop Now"
doesn't work all that well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Stop. Don't. Stop
Don't Stop. Don't Stop." Really! What moron ever actually believed abstinence could be effective? I'm 60, and I can still vividly remember being "that age." Better use birth control, kids, 'cause you're not gonna deny that rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Yah. I'm 63, and kids were doing it when I was a kid, too.
People like to think they weren't, but they're wrong. We may have been a skosh more careful, since contraception wasn't all that easy back then for teenies. Hell, it was illegal to sell condoms to anyone under the age of 21 in 1962-3. The pill was still a couple of years off.

Abstinence was not the most common method of contraception. Coitus interruptus was, along with non-coital fun and games. Back then, everyone was "going steady," and "going steady" for any period beyond 6 months was pretty much a guarantee that a couple was sexually active. It was almost impossible to resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. People like Palin think if they click their heels together and wish very hard, then
teenagers won't have sex, instead of being realistic and providing information and also access to birth control for them.

It stems from a belief that religion can solve everything, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Republicans need to prevent airheads to begin with."
But they don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC