Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Commercial Real Estate Developers To Paulson: Bail Us Out!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:55 PM
Original message
Commercial Real Estate Developers To Paulson: Bail Us Out!
http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/stories/2008/12/22/daily2.html

Commercial real estate developers seek bailout
Pittsburgh Business Times - by Tucker Echols Washington Business Journal


The commercial real estate industry is the latest to seek a government bailout.

A dozen real estate development groups have asked Uncle Sam for help to avoid defaults, foreclosures and bankruptcies. The Wall Street Journal reports that some of the country’s biggest developers have asked Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to be included in a $200 billion loan program recently created by the government to support the market for car loans, student loans and credit card debt.

In a letter to Paulson, the commercial real estate leaders warn that thousands of properties are in danger of foreclosure because current financing is coming due and credit for new financing is hard to come by. The report cites research from Foresight Analytics LCC that says $530 billion of commercial mortgages will be coming due for refinancing in the next three years.

Unlike residential mortgages, commercial mortgages are usually designed to last five to 10 years with balloon payments at the end of the term. A loan must be refinanced or repaid at the end of the term. If refinancing is unavailable, an owner would be faced with attempting a distress sale or losing the property.

Treasury officials have indicated a willingness to consider adding commercial real estate to the $200 billion loan initiative, but it could take time. The program is not even expected to be up and running, let alone modifiable, until February.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So TIF-ing isn't enough to execute a functional business model???????
:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No shit. These assholes have been at the forefront of lavish subsidies for businesses.
Not to mention doing everything in their power to fight labor and wage protections and pushing stupid tax cuts when times were flush. They are a big part of the reason so many states are broke right now. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You should see some of the shit that they got built around here and then WALKED AWAY from in
a relatively short period of time. Great looking, brand new, commercial structures standing empty!! Now, what the hell kind of "business" is it that can AFFORD to make those kinds of mistakes???? Answer: Business, the risks for which are Socialized, and the profits for which are Privatized, a.k.a. SOCIALISM for Commercial Developers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wouldn't the bank benefit by adjusting the terms of the commercial mortgage?
Say a developer has a commercial mortgage that's reaching the end of its term and is facing a big balloon payment. If the bank that holds that mortgage simply extends the loan and lets the developer continue making the monthly payment its been making for a few more years and defers the balloon payment, it's still making just as much money on the deal. On the other hand, foreclosure saddles the bank with an undervalued illiquid asset, which is something they'd presumably want to avoid.

Is it the case that a lot of commercial mortgages are bundled into mortgage backed securities making it unclear who has the authority to alter the terms of the loan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC