Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Perino, unhinged....Pt. XXX: Like omigod, Robert Redford sucks!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 08:42 PM
Original message
Dana Perino, unhinged....Pt. XXX: Like omigod, Robert Redford sucks!
from ThinkProgress:



Perino Confused About Environmentalists’ Objections To Drilling On Federal Lands»

Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is auctioning off resource rights to over 110,000 acres of public lands in Utah to oil and gas producers. The lands include parcels near Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, Dinosaur National Monument, and Nine Mile Canyon, which is home to “the highest concentration of Native American rock art in the United States.”

Yesterday, Robert Redford spoke out against the sale. He noted the lands’ significant historical value and criticized the Bush administration for its “deception” and “slight of hand” in rushing to hold today’s auction:

The lands are not Cheney’s and Bush’s. The lands are ours. They’re ours because they are part of our legacy. They are part of the human, American legacy. … We should not allow this to happen. It’s criminal.


Last night on the O’Reilly Factor, guest host Juan Williams asked White House Press Secretary to respond to Redford’s comments. After saying she would not “attack him personally,” Perino accused Redford of “blind hatred” of the president and said, “If somebody actually got him the facts, he would know that it’s illegal to drill in national parks.” Watch it: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/19/redford-perino-oil/


Perino, it seems, is the one who needs to get “the facts.” No one is claiming that the Bush administration wants to extract resources from National Parks. The Bush administration is, however, attempting to extract resources from areas located just outside such parks and historic landmarks without properly considering the detrimental effects drilling would have.

Indeed, the National Trust for Historic Preservation filed suit Wednesday in an attempt to block today’s auction for that reason. According to the suit, in rushing to complete the sales before the end of the Bush administration, the BLM violated multiple federal laws including the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and Federal Land Policy and Management Act.

In a statement to ThinkProgress, Karen Hevel-Mingo, Program Manager of the Southwest Region at National Parks Conservation Association, explained the expected negative impacts of drilling the areas that are up for auction today:

Oil and gas development near the parks would have a profound impact on park resources and the visitor experience. Air quality, water quality, views, night skies and natural quiet would all be in peril. Ozone levels at Arches and Canyonlands are already hitting the ceiling for allowed levels.

Additionally, roads and other infrastructure would be built allowing increased off road vehicle access and subsequent damage and creating long lasting scars across the landscape.



http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/19/redford-perino-oil/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, if I had to make a decision between Robert Redford and a Bush Lackey...
I hope Redford channels his anger going after Bush's legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "W" - a Spike Lee, Robert Redford, Michael Moore joint
Can we handle the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. OH, that is just too wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the pertinent question goes unasked
"If opening up these lands to environmental rape is such a good idea, Dana, why won't the Bush administration follow the well-established procedure to auction off this land?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC