Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is Blago charged with: selling a Senate seat or TALKING about selling a Senate seat?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:22 AM
Original message
What is Blago charged with: selling a Senate seat or TALKING about selling a Senate seat?
Put me on record as not defending the guy. But perhaps some lawyers can weigh in here: is there a case, without actual evidence of a crime committed?

:hide:

-snip-

According to the affidavit, in more than a month of recorded phone calls at his home and campaign office, Mr. Blagojevich considered numerous ways that he might personally and politically gain from the various Senate candidates, none of whom were identified by name in the court filing. One possible choice might be able to help him secure a post with the new administration as secretary of health and human services or energy; a “three way” deal involving a union and a candidate might win him a union leadership post; or perhaps, he could secure the high-paying helm of a nonprofit organization that could be created for him.

-snip-

The governor is accused of racing to solicit millions of dollars in donations from people with state business before an ethics law bars such behavior in January, and threatening to rescind state money this fall from businesses, including a Chicago hospital for children, whose executives refused to give him money. He is also accused of putting pressure on The Chicago Tribune to fire members of its editorial board who had criticized him or lose the governor’s help on the possible sale of Wrigley Field, which is owned by the Tribune Company and is home to the Chicago Cubs.

-snip-

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/us/politics/10Illinois.html?em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. The threats to the newspaper seems actionable...
his bloviating about the senate seat....just embarrassing.



I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. are some the charges 'conspiracy'-based charges?
talking about committing a crime is generally a felony in most states (if not all) and federally, even if the crime being 'talked about' is a misdemeanor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. well he did tell the CEO of Children's Memorial Hospital that he had to
contribute to his election fun if he wanted millions of state dollars to go to the hospital. That sounds VERY actionable to me. But, I'm not a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. But even then, no money exchanged hands. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:40 AM
Original message
It can't be legal to ask for money to your campaign to allocate money to a children's hospital
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. He also tried to pull the children's hospital funding
After the hospital did not fork over the cash to his campaign he started the process of pulling their funding. Another reason the feds acted now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I used to work as a nurse for Children's Memorial Their CEO was like Mr. Rogers.
Seriously. Some fucked up shit going on with blago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Read all about it:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Solicitation of a bribe is illegal
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 08:35 AM by Liberal_Lurker
I'm pretty certain of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think just discussing doing it would warrant a conspiracy charge?
Even if the actual crime never occurs.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey!
See, this is why I suggested that we tap all government officials' official phones. What fun we'd have day in and day out. I mean, if the government can tap my f'n phone, why can't we tap their (actually our) phones?

And then of course, what Blago did was nothing Bushco wouldn't do, so you have to ask, why is the press hammering the little guy while they let big guy (bush) slide? And isn't that one reason I won't buy anything the press dishes out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. um, being governor of a state is NOT being a "little guy"
and was the press also being unfair when they hammered Stevens? How about Ney? And Cunningham? And Abramoff? ]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not sure if this answers your question directly, but FItzgerald does clarify complaint:
Excerpt: from the transcripts of the Justice Department Briefing, New York Times, 9 November 2008:
Note: I highly recommend reading the full transcript - all 12 or 13 pages of it - it's informative and can answer some questions.

MR. FITZGERALD: "Well, you hit on two questions. One is a legal distinction. There is scheming or conspiracy to commit a crime and then there's a substantive crime. We've charged conspiracy or scheming in this complaint.

"One of the things we want to do with this investigation is to track out the different schemes and conspiracies to find out which ones were carried out or not and who might be involved in that or not. And that's something we haven't done yet. Now that we've gone overt we'll be interviewing people and figuring that out.

"But it is a crime in and of itself for people to scheme to violate the law. That's called conspiracy. Then there's a substantive crime.

"As far as how much -- whether or not there people acting like a tough guy or not, I don't want to pre-try the case, but if you lean on someone and leave them to believe their bill is not getting signed unless they give you the money, that is what acting like a tough guy is, it's a crime."

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/us/politics/09text-illinois.html?pagewanted=1&sq=ROD%20BLAGOJEVICH&st=nyt&scp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. he could have treated the Libby thing that way too
there was an enormous conspiracy in the Bush admin. to.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Agree with you both - but Bambino, you are making a critical point. I continue to believe Fitz
dropped the ball on Bush, Cheney and Rove. The question is "why".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I wonder how it will be once they are out of office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. there it is ...... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. people in very high places call him a Sociopath and Totally Insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. sounds a bit like the former Gov. Ehrlich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. The charges:
Blagojevich, 51, and Harris, 46, both of Chicago, are each charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery.

They conspired to commit the illegal acts, selling Sen. seat being one of them.

Same charges feds used to take down Dickie Scrugss, the Mississippi lawyer,
who had made a huge name for himself suing Phillip Morris, and who contributed heavily to Dems. Scruggs was charged with " intent to bribe a judge."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. conspiring to sell
Doesn't actually sell to commit the crime, talk and overt acts will suffice . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. To put it simply, Attempting to sell a Senate seat
It's just like attempted robbery. If you try to rob me but I pull out a gun, thus foiling your attempt, no money has exchanged hands but you still are guilty of a crime. I don't understand why that's such a difficult concept to grasp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacksonian Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. because there's no "trying to rob but gun is pulled"
only talk about possibly robbing, no gun needed by anyone yet. Legal problem as it applies to the written law admittedly, but i think you can see the difference in moral culpability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC