Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fords new CEO Alan Mulally made one good decision when he took over two years ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:11 PM
Original message
Fords new CEO Alan Mulally made one good decision when he took over two years ago
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 04:12 PM by NNN0LHI
http://www.newsweek.com/id/172243?from=rss

Can Ford Pull Ahead?

A strategy for surviving the possible collapse of the Big Three

As Detroit circles the drain, it appears all is lost for the American auto industry if taxpayers don't ride to the rescue with a $34 billion bailout. Or is it? Sure, General Motors and Chrysler says they'll be broke by New Year's, but the same is not true of Ford. In fact, after parking the plane and arriving at the Capitol in a hybrid, Ford CEO Alan Mulally told lawmakers Thursday he didn't expect to use the bailout billions he was seeking. Instead, he just wanted a "safeguard" from Uncle Sam. Should Congress not come through, analysts say Ford could still keep on rolling, even as its cross-town rivals crash. "Ford could end up being the sole survivor," says bond analyst Shelly Lombard of Gimme Credit research.

So why did Mulally go begging with his brethren on Capitol Hill? He's worried that if GM goes down, all of Detroit could take a dive. And that is a risk since the Big Three share 80 percent of their auto-parts suppliers. But not all suppliers buy the conventional wisdom that a GM failure will wipe them out. And for now, Ford is actually benefiting from the stink of bankruptcy hovering over GM and Chrysler. As auto sales cratered this fall, Ford's U.S. market share actually grew—to 16.1 percent in November from 14.7 percent in November 2007. The reason: Domestic car buyers are steering clear of GM and Chrysler and turning to Ford. A recent study by CNW Marketing Research showed that 32 percent of would-be GM buyers were scared off by the fear of bankruptcy. They defected to Ford more than any other automaker, the study found. "Ford is getting a boost in sales because people think they're in much better health," says IHS Global Insight analyst John Wolkonowicz.

The fact is, though, Ford is sick, too. It's lost $8.7 billion so far this year and struggles with the same high labor costs and SUV dependence as GM and Chrysler. But the company is in better shape because of what Mulally calls "the biggest home-equity loan in history." As soon as he arrived in Detroit from Boeing two years ago, Mulally mortgaged every asset Ford had—even old Henry's family name—to secure $23 billion in loans. Today, even after burning through billions, Ford still has a formidable stash of cash and credit worth almost $30 billion. That's nearly twice the size of GM's cash cushion and 12 times more than Chrysler has. Mulally's bet-the-house loan looked risky back in 2006, but now with credit frozen "it turned out to be a brilliant deal," says Lombard.

The bond market, which long ago wrote off Detroit, is starting to notice a difference between Ford and GM. Ford's long-term bonds are selling for 25 cents on the dollar. That's horrible, unless you consider that GM's long-term bonds are going for 18 cents on the dollar. "Ford's bonds are starting to diverge as GM looks closer to bankruptcy," says Lombard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting.
Its interesting if what makes Ford viable vs. GM and Chrysler is simply access to loans. In this environment, this is not a comforting thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Personally, I'm looking forward to the Fusion hybrid
It uses the same type of technology as Toyota's hybrids (Ford developed their hybrids separately from Toyota, but cross-licensed patents because it was so close) and should actually get significantly better fuel mileage than the Camry hybrid and can run up to 47mph on electric power alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ford improved its quality too
Consumer Reports rate Ford right up with the imports. All it takes is for the public to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACTION BASTARD Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. True this.
My prior experiences with Fords were pre-90 vehicles that broke my heart (Ford Bronco II) and I swore never to touch another Ford again.

As of now, I still think Fords are crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. recent crash tests...better than the japanese
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. i usually kill my time in the mall by looking at the cars and trucks
the fords i have looked at are very dam good. the fit of the body panels are excellent. the attention to design details is as good as any japanese auto company. ford has reduced their warranty work by 45%.

mulally has done a great job in financial and manufacturing decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC