"If they don't have anything to hide, then Rove et. al shouldn't MIND being

[Pryderi]

put under oath"

[Greeby]

1. Said by who?

LIttle context please? :shrug:

[NMMNG]

2. It's a play on the oft said "If you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't mind..."

said by the freepers every time a Liberal bemoans the continued ways the Rethugs strip away our personal privacies (phone taps, e-mail readings, searches, etc.).

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

3. The wiretappers and their supporters, I would imagine.

[merh]

5. I understand the context.

It is a valid point. Why should they be afraid to testify under oath if they have nothing to hide?

The question is much more valid than the fundies position that those of us against the illegal seizure of telephone and email records under the guise of "hunting terrorists" shouldn't be concered if we have done nothing wrong.

[Pryderi]

6. I just like throwing their feces back at them ;)

[merh]

8. And it was a perfect pitch!

:hi:

[Postman]

4. This f*cking Bush thinks he's above the law...

They're sh*tting their pants now. No more republican rubber stamp Congress.

[april]

7. hide Nothing ?

They have everything to hide from maybe day 1!
These subhumans planned this long before the elections !!! MONEY MONEY MONEY LIES LIES the American people are just so damn f.... Stupid all they do is watch the news on TV ..make them happy give them American Idol and just buy all the new stations and give them what they have asked for ..NOTHING!!!!!
This was long before those ass wipes understood we are all informed! We get our news for the real people of the Us and other countries and they did not count on that!

[texpatriot2004]

9. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? It is still an appropriate question. nt