Siegelman Case: Tamarah Grimes' complaint against Canary's office is scathing -- good read.

[pacalo]

After reading this complaint -- dated July 30, 2007 -- I feel confident that Siegelman's contrived conviction will be overturned.

All 10 pages of her complaint reads like a gossip column. This is a vicious office, filled with underqualified people favored by Canary, & I do wonder how many of those colleagues cited in Grimes' complaint were willing to back her up.

You're going to enjoy this: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/1122Grimes.PDF

[midnight]

1. It is such an unprofessional environment. How can these

people be in charge of the "Big Case" when they seem more distracted by their own petty day to day nonsense? Mr. Siegelman and his family deserve better than this.

[pacalo]

2. Yes, the daily "slice & dice" gossip sessions about things such as vaginal warts

was unprofessional at best, but the gossip about one colleague's credit rating was downright criminal -- that they have access to this information & were spreading it around shows what they are made of.