Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One year ago today: Joe Horn shot two burlgars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:45 AM
Original message
One year ago today: Joe Horn shot two burlgars
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 11:17 AM by aikoaiko
Yep, it was one year ago.


Joe Horn, the shooter


Hernando Riascos Torres (aka: M.A. DeJesus) and Diego Ortiz, the burglars


From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Horn_shooting_controversy">Wiki (as good a synopsis as any):

The Joe Horn shooting controversy refers to the events of November 14, 2007, in Pasadena, Texas, United States when local resident Joe Horn shot and killed two men burglarizing his neighbor's home. Publicized recordings of Horn's exchange with emergency dispatch indicate that he was asked repeatedly not to interfere with the burglary, because the police would soon be on hand.<1> The shootings have resulted in debate regarding self-defense, Castle Doctrine laws, and Texas laws relating to use of (deadly) force to prevent or stop property crimes. The illegal alien status of the burglars has been highlighted because of the U.S. border controversy.<2> On June 30, 2008, Joe Horn was cleared by a grand jury in the Pasadena shootings.

Joe Horn, 61, spotted two burglars breaking into his next-door Vietnamese-American neighbor's home in Pasadena, Texas. He called 911 to call police to the scene. While on the phone with emergency dispatch, Horn stated that he had the right to use deadly force to defend property, referencing a law (Texas Penal Code § 9.41., § 9.42., and § 9.43.) which justified the use of deadly force to protect property. He stated that he was going to go outside and confront the burglars. As the burglars were exiting his neighbor's home, and approaching Horn's home, Horn exited his home with his shotgun, while the 911 Operator tried to dissuade him from that action. On the 911 tape, he is heard confronting the suspects, saying, "Move, and you're dead",<3> immediately followed by the sound of a shotgun blast, followed by two more.<4> Following the shootings Mr. Horn told the 911 operator, "They came in the front yard with me, man, I had no choice!" <5>

Police initially identified the dead men in Horn's yard as 38-year-old Miguel Antonio DeJesus and Diego Ortiz, 30, both of Houston of Afro Latino descent. However, DeJesus was actually an alias of Hernando Riascos Torres, 38.<3> They were carrying a sack with more than $2,000 cash and jewelry taken from the home. Both were convicted criminals from Colombia who had entered the country illegally, and were members of an organized burglary ring in Houston.<1> Police found a Puerto Rican identification card on Ortiz while Torres had three identification cards from Colombia, Puerto Rico, and the Dominican Republic, and had been previously sent to prison for dealing cocaine and was deported in 1999.<6>

A plain clothes police detective responding to the 911 call had arrived at the scene before the shooting and witnessed the escalation and shootings, while remaining in his car.<3> His report on the incident indicated that the men who were killed "received gunfire from the rear".<1> Police Capt. A.H. Corbett stated the two men ignored Mr. Horn's order to freeze and one of the suspects ran towards Joe Horn before he angled away from him toward the street when he was shot in the back. Pasadena police confirmed that the two men were shot after they ventured into his front yard. The detective did not arrest Horn.


Here is the audio tape of the http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7jqLie6-Y0">911 call and here is a a http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/17/national/main3517564.shtml?source=mostpop_story">CBS article with selected highlights from the audio tape.


On June 30, 2008, Joe Horn was "cleared" of any charges after the grand jury listened to testimony presented by the DA and found insufficient evidence to indict.

Statement from City of Pasadena

With a decision by the grand jury not to return a true bill against Mr. Horn, a panel of citizens drawn from the community has determined that the facts of the incident did not warrant the handing up of an indictment for criminal actions. The grand jury, hearing the available facts and witnesses as well as the law to be applied in this case, is in the best position to make that determination.

Mr. Horn has satisfied the state, through the grand jury process, that his actions do not warrant criminal prosecution on these charges. We hope that the decision of the grand jury, while difficult for some to accept, will be respected as the product of a careful weighing of all the facts by an impartial panel of citizens.

This incident has been a tragedy for all those involved, changing lives forever. The obvious lessons that can be drawn from it are that criminal activities are inherently a dangerous lifestyle, and the prevention and pursuit of those involved in criminal actions are best left to the police. They are professionals trained to meet the unexpected circumstances of pursuit and apprehension. The City of Pasadena intends to continue to provide its police force whatever resources required to assure our citizens that their community remains a safe place to live and work.


The Grand Jury testimony is sealed, but I think it came down to this. Joe Horn did nothing illegal by confronting the burglars with a shotgun and if they did run toward him on his property than the Grand Jury probably believed his claims of self-defense. Apparently, there was a plainclothes officer in his car (who just pulled up) who saw the shooting and testified.

Some people say that Joe Horn got away with murder (he clearly said some incriminating things on the 911 call) and others say he acted as a good neighbor who didn't let criminals victimize him or his neighbors (he also clearly defined his actions in terms of duty and civil responsibility).

While I probably would have followed the direction of the dispatcher to stay inside and let the police handle it because they were arriving on the scene, I will always back up a citizen who, within the bounds of the law, confronts criminals. Its risky to do so (because of being harmed or becoming overzealous and committing a crime yourself), but I think there is nothing wrong with confronting criminal behavior.


edited typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh that was a hot topic on DU, I remember.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Love you aikoaiko but we have to disagree on this one
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 10:49 AM by shadowknows69
He murdered those men in cold blood and he told the dispatcher he was going to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I can understand why you say that -- this case, IMO, is right up to the line

of legal justification and I can see why many would say it goes over that line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No doubt about that. It seems to come down to the patrolman's testimony
And I hate to have to say I'm less than confident in Police testimony occasionally. Particularly when two black, dead, alleged criminals are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. I remember that debate here on DU
I'm still okay with what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I am also. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. With the information available, it has always seemed to me that
this guy went out of his way to be able to shoot a couple of burglars. Something I personally find incredibly morally reprehensible. This from an ex-military man that personally owns three firearms.

Olafr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Two robbers enter a 61-year old man's yard,
run towards him, and end up getting shot. It's easy to sit at your computer in the cold clear light of day and rant and rave about rootin' tootin' Texas-style vigilante frontier justice and accuse the guy of being a murderer, but I'm more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt (as the Grand Jury decided to do).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Your point is valid except he specifically went out into the yard to confront them.
His own words and actions showed from the get go that he wanted to kill these two men come hell or high water.

Olafr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Weren't they shot in the back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I've been looking for the coroners report,

I remember seeing a diagram when this was current news and yes it looked like one is shot from the side/back, and the other the back. It was Horn's testimony that they turned just as he pulled the trigger.


Still looking for the coroners report, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. As sad as the outcome was
if more people were to take actions against criminals there would be less crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know you're not advocating vigilantism
Please tell me you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11.  If I may, one can confront criminals within the bounds of the law, and one can...

...confront criminals by breaking laws. I consider the former, good citizenship, and the latter, vigilantism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:30 AM
Original message
We're on the same page there
And I still have to see Horn as a vigilante. Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's a grey area
It's hard to classify Horn as a man defending himself (It wasn't his property), but it is hard to classify him as a vigilante for stopping two guys from robbing his neighbor's home. I agree in principle that confronting criminals within the laws is good citizenship and confronting criminals by breaking laws is vigilantism, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. No, I'm not advocating for vigilantism.
I simply feel we, as citizens, have not only a right but an obligation to confront criminals (if you are able). We need to be calling these folks out. Hopefully there will be NO violence.

As an example; if I see someone messing around my neighbors home in the dark and I know they are out of town I feel responsible to find out if they belong there. Are they family who are supposed to be there or are they a ne'er do well who will simply leave if called out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. and there will be *definitely* less crime committed by Dejesus and Ortiz.

None at all, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. And Lady Justice weeps behind blindfolded eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I'm guessing not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. and if we utilized capital punishment, there would be fewer murders..
oh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. I missed this Nightline piece

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMEfgSAk4yM&feature=related">Nightline did a little piece just before the grand jury made their announcement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. I know it's days after this was posted but I just saw it and I'm going to give my $.02 worth.
I am glad he shot the two motherfuckers dead. Give him a pat on the back and say "good job".

I am so fucking tired of hearing about friends and neighbors being robbed. Of reading about hard-working people coming home to find their belongings gone, their sense of security totally stolen and they left worrying that the dipshits will return when the next opportunity arises.

I am fed up with people having to lock every goddam window and door in their home just to go to the store to get a newspaper.

I have had it with women having to worry that some pair of thieves might come into their home and take the "opportunity" to rape them, maybe kill them, and certainly steal from them.

I am outraged that innocent people have to live in fear that some so-called human being will break into their home, steal their belongings, and forever undermine their sense of trust in their fellow human beings.

FUCK THOSE TWO ASSHOLES. They and their ilk are the ones who turn many of our fellow citizens into scared, angry, untrusting souls. The world is better off with them dead. And the taxpayers did not have to feed, clothe, doctor them, and provide them with a lawyer.

Good Work, Joe.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Being a burglar is a dangerous job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. But not as dangerous as burlgar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Can't say I've shed any tears for the burglars.
Damn thieving shitbags. I probably would have shot them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterHowdy Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. Theives don't deserve death.
And anyone who goes out of his/her way to blow two men away with a shotgun are fucking sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. May someone return the favor some day.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 12:08 AM by alarimer
Ugly excuse for a human being.

AS are his supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. I realize that there are a lot of us liberals who think that all human beings are wonderful
and that only a bad childhood or insufficient hugs keeps the bad folks from being good folks.

Unfortunately that is not the reality of the world in which we live. There are some folks who are just bad people. These are the folks who steal from their fellow human beings because they think they're entitled to whatever they can get away with. These are the folks who abuse their spouses, family, and loved ones. These are the folks who bilk honest, hardworking folks out of their life savings and their retirement funds. These are the folks who molest helpless children. These are the folks who love to see other humans in pain. These are the folks who like to kill their fellow human beings. These are the folks who are ready and willing to intimidate and bully, and if necessary, harm or kill others so that they may have what they desire.

Sadly, there are a lot of these bastards living in our world. Apparently they've been a fair-sized segment of human societies from the beginning of recorded history, judging from what we read about the deeds of these human animals.

I long ago gave up the notion that ALL human life is sacred. We are animals just like every other mammal on this planet. We have evolved to a point where we can use tools and even use a good portion of our brains, but we have not evolved beyond the point where we are not animals.

Some animals are predators and survive by killing and eating other animals. Others are the prey upon whom the predators prey. Civilized society has tried to control the most grievous aggression of the human predators among us toward our fellow members of society. Different societies have evolved to allow more violent behavior and more predatory behavior than others, i.e. our society accepts the wholesale slaughter of foreigners in our names, but decries the killing of members of our social group. At times the "group" definition expands and at other times it contracts. For example, killing black slaves by working them to death or even whipping them to death for disobedience was accepted before the abolition of slavery. Nowadays, we recoil at the idea of even enslaving someone.

But still we so-called civilized humans view different levels of predation as acceptable while others are not. Shoplifting from a business is considered acceptable enough that it does not warrant a severe punishment. Whereas, killing someone and taking their personal belongings warrants more severe punishment.

Usually even the most grievous crimes against the lower caste/class humans of our society do not receive the kinds of punishment that is meted out to those who dare to commit the same crimes against the upper caste/class humans.

The weak among us (usually those who are too young, too old, or too poor to protect themselves) are the societal members who are most adversely affected by the aggession of the predator class. These are the folks who are most at risk to have their homes robbed, their vehicles broken into when they leave valuables in them, or to be victimized by the callous thugs among us.

Those thugs are the ones who bring a hell of a lot of pestilences down upon us. Pestilence in the form of a diseased society. A society where neighbors cannot trust others in their neighborhood. A society where the weak are preyed upon by the physically strong and morally bankrupt. A society where people who try to live by the rules are undermined by the lawless. A society where the thugs keep many of us living in fear. A society where we expend far too much money on police protection and security measures because the thugs won't let us live open and free lives.

I have no sympathy for the thieves, the rapists, the murderers, the financial raiders, the dictators, the child molesters, the stoners of women, the enslavers of other peoples.

Their motto is Do Unto Others Whatever You Can Get Away With.

At least two of those assholes didn't get away with their thieving. Sometimes justice does actually happen. Despite the best efforts of some of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC