Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Worst May Be Yet to Come for Citigroup

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:06 AM
Original message
Worst May Be Yet to Come for Citigroup
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/business/14place.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Citigroup, which a decade ago set out to rewrite the rules of American finance, is bracing for still more pain now that a recession is at hand. Loans that the financial giant made to consumers in good times are going bad in growing numbers. For the moment, profits seem as elusive as ever, analysts say.

Once the most valuable financial company in America, Citigroup is withering along with its share price, which this week sank into single digits for the first time in a dozen years. The company is also shrinking in another painful way: by cutting, and cutting, and cutting jobs. Another round of pink slips is expected next week.

As Vikram S. Pandit completes his first year as chief executive, many analysts say Citigroup has lost its way. Insiders say the company is racked by office politics at a critical moment in its history.

Mr. Pandit is struggling to regain his grip on the company, which operates in scores of countries, after his attempt to buy Wachovia was upended by Wells Fargo. That misstep left Citigroup grasping for a new strategy to lure deposits and build up its branch network in the United States.

“Citi doesn’t have a credible management team, they don’t have a credible board,” said Christopher Whalen, managing partner at Institutional Risk Analytics. “If you look at their loss rate, it is almost inevitable that Citi is going to be asking the government for more money next year.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. This Naomi Wolf is interesting.
Thanks for the links.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. One of those wealthy Saudi princes is invested
in Citi and was demanding layoffs many months ago. Hey, maybe Citi can buy American Express or why not buy McDonald's....they're making some money! Or maybe McDonald's should buy Citi?

What is happening in the financial world is absolutely UNPRECEDENTED! I just sit in awe at what the rich white boys day after day...and NO ONE does a thing about it.

They are robbing us blind and here we sit.

So what's on TV tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or maybe McDonald's should buy Citi?
Free credit card in every Happy Meal!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Good one...
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 03:18 PM by femrap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Sprat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. We don't even get to hold any collateral.
It seems to me since we, the public, is being forced to buy the private debt, we should be given public ownership of the oil companies and healthy institutions in the meantime. It only seems fair. If you're going to saddle the public with bad paper, then give them something solid to hold onto as collateral. I want Exxon myself. Had my eyes on Standard Oil since I started walking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I'll take a ag biz...
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 03:18 PM by femrap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mymessageboardid Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Yes, he is invested heavily
in Citi. Bush and Paulson will take care of them for sure :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Great article about the Bust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. When you build a house of cards, it does not take much of a breeze to knock it down..
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 12:25 AM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Imagine replacing your name with Citibank: "I" don't have a credible plan or
anybody credible on board, and when you look at my loss rate, it's almost certain I'll be asking the government for MORE money next year!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder what occurred a decade ago?
Only the repeal of Glass-Steagall and passage of new financial services legislation (the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999), Signed by the Big Dawg and setting aside most of the regulations put in place after the "Great Depression" to prevent a repeat.

Now I'm certain that Clinton had know idea what he was signing, but his advisors must have had some notion.

What scares me about the insane 700 billion dollar bailout is that Obama voted for it and I imagine his economic advisors told him to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The thing is the Saudis were major players back then too
and even bigger players now.

I never expected this house of cards to collapse so soon.
I gave it around 2010. The media hasn't caught up on this crap
or is unwilling to do so. I now see news items on this on national circuits.

I was one the first on the internet to trace the LOANS from the feds
to Banks 2 years ago, to pump up the market, I traced it up
to trillions of unaccountable money but guess what?

Free Traders said it was paid back, even though they could
produce no evidence of the pay back on the net.


Now the feds are saying those loans are unaccountable.

I'm willing to give the historical data on those posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. If they want a bail out from the Fed, then they need to sack their executive managment entirely.
On top of that, if they miss payments on their debt obligations to the government, then they should have their interest rate jacked up to 29.99%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Just do a search..... twenty fricking pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Inconsequential. Market rallied almost 600 today and had a 900 point turnaround
So everything is fine. (All based on "normal" market action, of course.)

This article is just more conspiracy kookery, designed to make us feel bad and lose confidence in the Matrix, um I mean System, which has seen it's problems, but is recovering now, thanks to The Bailout and other helpful measures from The Fed and the other Criminals, um, I mean officials who are working their tail ends off for the American People.

Why aren't you reporting any of the positive news that will make us feel good and manage our perception so that negative thinking doesn't cause the problems we have to manifest themselves and become real, like happened with the Stock Market Crash and the "almost" recession we have now?

:sarcasm:

Seriously though SLAD, Thanks for posting this. It's just another piece of the puzzle that reveals all the rot lying just below the surface, that they so desperately want us to ignore.

in complete contrast to all this, take a look at the interesting piece of fiction posted on the Yahoo Finance front page just after the Market closed today, with it's miracle rally.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081113/wall_street.html

Not on DU, but elsewhere I have been taking heat for calling today one of the biggest official sector interventions in the Market's history. This was a completely futures driven, bullshit power move by TPTB. The idea that this was millions of "savvy investors" jumping on the Bottom at the same time to get in at "Bargain Prices" is nothing more than Goebbels like pablum. All day long the floor on the NYSE was a MORGUE. Dead Calm. News was bad all around and never got better. But that didn't matter. All of a sudden the Gates Of Heaven Opened and Mana for all. To Quote Dr. Evil:

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Take a look at this Futures chart for the Dow. Note the action starting exactly at 1PM. Does this look like normal Market activity to you?

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=CBOT_YM.Z08.E

Keep in mind the economic news that had just come out a few hours earlier and yesterday.

Again:

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

If you can find a chart from October 10th, take a look at that and ask yourself: "Haven't I seen this Movie Before?"

Like Morpheus told us in 2001- "No one can tell you what The Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself."

But hey, everything is fine, nothing exists, nothing is real, The Fed is good and loves you, The Bailout has saved the system, Paulson is a true Patriot and American hero, The Banking System is recovering, Houses are cheap, stocks are cheap, GM and Ford will come screaming back in the 1st Quarter of 2009, and of course, Citi, has a bright future.....

As a newly acquired entity of JP Morgan.

Peace Be, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pandit completed one full year at Citigroup? That's worth a bonus, for sure!
For that matter, all the directors who appointed him need to be rewarded for their keen business sense, too!

Heck, just deduct it from their U.S. Treasury Express Gold Card ("Don't Leave Your Mansion Without It").

:sarcasm:, in case it was needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC