|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 04:54 PM Original message |
Poll question: I support the prosecution of Bush administration criminals by the Obama administration Y/N |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. keep this kicked for a few hours DU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. K&R YES! YES! YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. If law is not enforced then in short time there is no law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. There's NO WAY any of these people are going to be held accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I think that Congress will not call for the prosecution of many politicians because it mite make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. And there's NO WAY we'll see a black president in this lifetime either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. I support it, but I don't expect it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. Who voted no? That's pretty shocking. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think what we are going to find is the attitude that we must move on and not look back. That's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. That attitude is what the problem is. It's what got us into this mess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I agree. But what is the remedy? Our Congress-critters will not listen to us. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. If so, I see BIG PROBLEMS for the Dems in the next election cycle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. And here is the rub. You do not have a choice. Demo incumbents can not be beaten in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
39. W/the exception of one low information person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can't you put in a category stronger than merely "yes"? How about "You're GD right". Or "F-yes".nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lincolngirl (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. I would love to see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. We must do this. K&R nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. You durn toot'en |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. I support prosecution in the event of any significant obstruction of Obama's agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. Only the House and Senate can try and convict and Impeach... Obama has no say in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Not exactly true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Thanks, H2O Man but what I meant was that Obama can only pardon., He does NOT have... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
21. No.The reason is PRECEDENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. What gibberish, they are specifically the reason the impeachment process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Exactly. They ARE the reason impeachment exists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Only if he/she broke the law as * et al has. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Nonsense. Retribution is part of the RW gospel. There was this president named Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
41. I've head that argument before. I don't buy it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:26 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Where did you get your definition of 'political expediency' and 'rule of law' from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. So if I hear you right, we shouldn't hold these criminals accountable because in the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. No. They SHOULD be held accountable. They SHOULD have been impeached already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. This isn't impeachment, this is war crimes. I think the sitting president needs to do this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. I fully support war crimes charges. I am against expanding unchecked presidential powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. Turn them over to the World Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. Vincent Bugliosi would be the perfect Special Prosecutor for this job. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. I Could Imagine... wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. This question has to be asked??! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
32. KICK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-13-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
40. Or at least a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Once they're out of office, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
42. ^ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
44. Absolutely not. By a court of law, sure, but NO to political prosecutions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC