|
That should not be confused with whether or not people wanted profligate spending and crushing deficits. We already got *that* from Repubics.
But do people really not want bigger government when 'bigger' government might actually be the right answer?
Say what you will, but, when it comes right down to it, I would bet my left testicle that almost no one would not favor cheaper, better healthcare for which their employer would no longer have to pay and checks for which they would never have to personally write.
Who would not favor increased government scrutiny of the thugs who have been running our financial giants? Would even a trickle down supply sider object to a few more federal investigators if they prevented the Roman orgies STILL being undertaken by AIG on our bailoutbux?
How happy might the automakers be right now if they had been forced to make fuel efficient cars ten or twenty years ago such that they'd still be solvent today and busily making cars you and I want to buy? How happy would their workers be? Even the ones who would vote to have phantom welfare queens burned at the stake?
Would anyone object to a more competent, muscular FEMA?
Big government is not bad government. And now that we've had eight years of bad government, I expect most epople will be thrilled to have good government.
Government that works.
Some of it bigger. Some of it leaner.
All of it better.
I'm amazed that we may well have finally wrestled this issue away from the Repubics, where it has been bastardized and abused.
|