|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
carnie_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:43 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should Bush and Cheney be impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes they should. 1, 2, 3 cue the naysayers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. "should" be impeached and a reasonable expectation are very different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Actually, they can be impeached after leaving office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. if they're no longer in office I don't think it's called 'impeachment' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. OK -- works for me. See you at The Hague? Save me a seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. interesting read - thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Have to agree with th sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. This post was a matter of "should." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I think that's a pretty unrealistic timeframe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. "It will never happen." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not just yes, but HELL YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. If we can't impeach them can we render them to the Hague?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. that makes the most sense to me also.. kinda late to start impeachment procedures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Impeachment would keep him from pardoning the rest of the criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Yes. Rendering To The Hague Is Always An Option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. yes, so all the idiots who think they shouldn't understand why they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
az chela (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. They also should be charged as WAR CRIMINALS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heathen57 (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. IMO, here is what should happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
16. impeachment is barely a slap on the wrist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. Jailed for the remainder of their lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. Then jailed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. Yes!! The Only Hope For Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Of course, but it won't happen until Americans understand that abuses of power are crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbiehoff (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. Other -- All of the above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Restoring the rule of law in America requires that they be indicted and prosecuted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. YES! Successful impeachment would most likely remove Secret Service protection long after they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. They Should Also Be Tried As Criminal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frosty1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. Impeached and Prosecuted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. Impeach, indict, imprison! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes, Yes, YES....Tomorrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. Um. ... Duh? Impeach. Prosecute. Tar and feather. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carnie_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Great minds think alike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. They should have been impeached in 2002. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swishyfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
34. No. Time to move on. Bush is gone in 2 months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Move On = Come Back and Do It Again In the Future Anytime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-09-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
35. Yes, They Should. No, They Won't Be. No, We Shouldn't Try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Wrong, we should try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. No We Shouldn't And No We Wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I've heard that hundreds of times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. You Wouldn't Be Putting A Stop To It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I still say you're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. You Say Lots Of Things That Aren't True. No Biggie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. What I say isn't true? Could you elaborate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
37. Impeach. Remove. Indict. Convict. Imprison. (Rinse Repeat.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
38. Damn strait they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
39. We are either a country that believes that the same laws apply to all or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-10-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
46. Vote #101 for "Impeach the Bastards" here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-11-08 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
49. $100 says obama's not going to go after them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dangerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-11-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
50. Hell yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC