Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VIDEO: Sestak, Andrews Dominate Debate With Tom DeLay and Richard Perle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:03 PM
Original message
VIDEO: Sestak, Andrews Dominate Debate With Tom DeLay and Richard Perle
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/18/mtp-iraq-debate/

VIDEO: Sestak, Andrews Dominate Debate With Tom DeLay and Richard Perle

Today, NBC’s Meet the Press featured a panel with retired Navy Admiral Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) and Win Without War director Tom Andrews debating former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) and prominent neocon Richard Perle.

Andrews and Sestak made short work of DeLay and Perle. Andrews emphasized how dangerous it is to place U.S. soldiers into a civil war. “Our kids don’t know when they’re out there on the streets of Baghdad, whether the people they’re next to are the enemy or their allies. … They’re losing their lives as a result.”

Sestak made the case for redeploying U.S. forces out of Iraq. “Even George Washington at the Battle of Brandywine understood after this initial clash that he had to redeploy and go elsewhere to assume the strategic victory. That’s what this is about. Is there a better way to handle Iraq and then to be able to handle the entire security environment?”

Watch it at link:

At one point, DeLay claimed that places like Bahrain and Qatar wouldn’t accept U.S. troops who had redeployed out of Iraq. Sestak put his hand on DeLay’s arm and informed him that the U.S. military already has bases in those countries.

Later, Perle made the incredible statement that “‘Redeploy’ is a euphemism for cut-and-run.” Note to Perle: redeployment is an official military term (see this entry in the Pentagon’s Dictionary of Military Terms). “Cut and run” is the euphemism, and a tired and false one at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I watched--the old guard just had old talking points-over and over!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. thank you babylonsister for
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 01:49 PM by cal04
posting this. I saw it this morning and thought they did great! For people that never served they sure do think they know better than people who did. Andrews point of who he'd trust was great to hear. everyone should read the transcript if they didn't see it.
:hi:
FMR. REP. ANDREWS: Tom, with all due respect, I think I'd be much more comfortable taking the military strategy advice of Admiral Sestak than, than Tom DeLay. And listen, you know, we in Washington love to talk about what's in the best interest of the, the people of Iraq. We've been doing this for years and years. Why don't we ask the people of Iraq what they think? If you ask the people...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17628142/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You are very welcome!
I thought they were good, too, and made DeLay and Perle look like the scum that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, it was pretty one-sided. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think Joe Sestak is the best freshman Democrat in the Congress
I hope to see him running for Arlen Spector's Senate seat in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Agreed
He's smart and articulate (and probably clean), and when it comes to national defense he grinds up and spits out chickenhawks like Perle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wish Mr. PotatoHead had asked Perle ...
"Could you please tell our viewers about a single instance where you've been right about anything?"

Perle would still be sitting there now, trying to think of something ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for posting the link to the clip
I agree with almost everything that was said by Mr's Setak and Andrews. I was dissapointed that Mr Sestak presented the idea that Iran was a threat. It may be his military background, but I'm pretty sure that Iran would not be a threat unless we put them in a position where they had no choice. I helped get him elected, but I think I need to hold his feet to the fire to get a better return on my investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Richard Perle should be strung up by his nuts
on a bridge in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. this is must see TV
was just about to post it. :hi: K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC