Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Get tihis: the wingnuts are crying foul because Waxman wouldn't allow VT to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:11 PM
Original message
Get tihis: the wingnuts are crying foul because Waxman wouldn't allow VT to
dazzle the panel with her "expertise":

This occured earlier today, during Rep. Waxman’s Valerie Plame show trial. Keep in mind that Victoria Toensing wrote the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, the law that was at the center of the Plame-Wilson fracas. Keep in mind that she knows what the law is for and whom it covers, since she wrote it. Keep also in mind that Toensing was called to Waxman’s kangaroo court as a witness. Witnesses generally answer questions asked of them in such settings. That’s why they’re there.

Now, watch Nostrildamus not allow said witness, an expert’s expert since she wrote the law in question, to answer questions.


http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/16/video-henry-waxman-grills-victoria-toensing/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nostrildamus? Someone who predicts the future with his nose?
Another freeper spelling. We're screwn!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It's a non-scents-ical insult to Waxman from a moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Obviously not someone who nose what he's talking about.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Anti-proboscis, he's clearly a...
BOOGERHEAD. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I thought Nancy Grace was Nostrildamus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. She's a boogerhead too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. "hotair" sums it all up...
toensing is one strange looking woman....her eyes are down right scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's Michelle Malkin's website.
Don't expect anything that's even vaguely like logic from that place. She's nuts and that nuttiness taints the whole place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Toensing may have written the law 25 years ago, but that does
not give her any knowledge of Plame's status at the CIA when the leak occurred. Again, they are adding 2 and 2 and coming up with 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. The way I feel about Vicky Toensing, in her own facial expression:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is she stoned or what?
Maybe she parties with Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. man oh man
"got crack"?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Are you asking about Limbaugh? I think he's probably got a lot of crack.
:puke:

No, I'm not paying for any decrease in sight that may have resulted from reading those words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. no, I'm talking about Vicky
she looks completely stoned :hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. She looks like she's in the middle..
... of a big O brought on by something unholy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. who? this guy?
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. To be honest..
.... I'm not sure he's up to the task :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Eh. They're always crying about something.
How does the old saying go?

"If you can't dazzle them with truth, baffle them with bullshit"? It'll do in this case.

Answering the simple questions gets BushCo in trouble, so they must endlessly prevaricate and obfuscate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. My response to those morAns is: JUST GET OVER IT.
Bwahahahaha, you lost. Too bad, so sad. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hmmm, gee I thought she did answer questions.
Wasn't she asked about the DCI's statement that Val was covert?

I do remember watching her testimony, and IIRC, it wasn't one of her "finest moments".

Anybody got a transcript of her appearance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. Waxman put her in her place after she finished testifying...
... to paraphrase, he told her that forcefully arguing something did not mean it was true.

IMHO VT committed perjury on several occasions, and she took her role of testifying very lightly and acted in a cavalier fashion regarding very serious matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC