Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two words... Supreme court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:11 PM
Original message
Two words... Supreme court
HELL YEAH. its safe now :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. This is a real victory one we could not afford to lose or all would be lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanTheGOP Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is IMPORTANT to get YOUNG JUDGES ON THE COURT!
It is VERY IMPORTANT to get young, brilliant progressive judges on the Supreme Court. We should encourage the members whom are retiring to retire in the first two years, so we can have an UNSTOPPABLE nomination.

That nominations should be given to progressive judges who are under 30 years of age, if possible, and will commit to staying in great shape all of his/her life so that we can have at LEAST a half-century of consistent, progressive interpretations of the US Constitution. If we can get at LEAST two judges to leave during the first two years, then we can ensure that we can legislate from the bench if necessary.

In addition, we should fill EVERY judge vacancy with young, progressive judges as soon as possible. I would submit that we should put a litmus test on the ages of federal judges at 40. This should be a HIGH PRIORITY, and we should fill out the federal slate of appellate and regional federal judges by 2009.

See my journal for other congressional laws to pass in the first month, like signing the Kyoto Treaty, Fairness Doctrine, institute an IMMEDIATE corporate tax hike, and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank GOD!
thanks for the reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. anytime anytime :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. BIG BIG STORY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC