Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So there never was an investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:49 AM
Original message
So there never was an investigation
According to the Administration's head of security there is no investigation nor has there been one in the years he has been there. All of Scotty's "I can't answer because of ongoing investigation" is just one more LIE piled on top of the mountain of LIES this Administration has told and been telling. IMO this one is pretty big news. Why was there no investigation. A major breach in National Security and it isn't even thought worthy of investigation....IMO this is one more "High Crime and Misdemeanor? that can and should be laid at the feet of the Administration. What possible excuse can they come up with for not even putting on a show of an investigation? They paid as much attention to this outing of a covert CIA Agent as they did to warnings given before 9-11. They are very reckless and carefree with our nation's security and that is an extremely scary idea...What other disaster is yet in our future and could the Democrats if they so wished prevent it? If this latest Bombshell (no investigation) doesn't raise the ire of America I guess nothing will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, there never was, not even one, nobody lost any security
clearance, and in spite of an obligation under the law there was never an investigation.

And might I say Knodell is a blowhard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. You should have seen Knodell testifying yesterday. My chin was
on the floor! The hutzpa of this admin knows no bounds. And I think Waxman, et al., were appropriately shocked as well.
He's already taken action; check out this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=430839
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Libby held his security clearance authority until the day he resigned.
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 10:06 AM by higher class
Rove still has his. Cheney still has his.

On the chart - there are two black boxes.

No wonder Fitzgerald hasn't gone after the leaker(s). Yet. They are diffuse. By plan? Or cooperation? Or just cover-up? Another form of dis-reality?

Circles of dis-reality. Some fell out of the circle yesterday thanks to citizens who still care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. They called in Victoria Toensing and she explained that the
point of law - which she wrote and the way it should be interpreted - means that there was no crime to be investigated. So Karl kicked in to action and created the dis-reality of accountability while Cheney did his thing to close down Brewster-Jennings once and for all. Except. That wasn't all.

Now it's up to the citizens whether they are going to eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC