Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look Armitage was THE leaker! (Waxman's Chart)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:45 AM
Original message
Look Armitage was THE leaker! (Waxman's Chart)
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 01:56 AM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unless I'm reading this chart incorrectly, it looks like there
were leaks were coming from all angles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No Armitage was Novak's "two senior admin officials" and THE
leaker! Can't you see that? Plus Clinton once visited a nudist camp with the cousin of Ted Kennedy's brother in law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, according to republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. That chart shows a lot of treasonists...
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 02:05 AM by Breeze54
imho! All on the first and second row are criminals! But we already knew that!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wait a sec. Where's Russert?
The WH was shopping this info around more extensively than this chart shows. It doesn't show everyone who knew about Valerie Wilson.

There's more to this that needs to come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is hard for me to keep straight
but my recollection was that Libby told the FBI that he learned about Plame's identity from Russert and Russert denied every having a conversation with him about it, not that Libby leaked it to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Russert wasn't leaked to.
Libby claimed that he learned about Wilson's wife from Russert on July 10. Russert testified that was impossible because he didn't know about Plame until he read Novak's July 14 column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. a leak doesn't have to be published
Every instance of somebody telling her identity to somebody who didn't have the clearance, which includes EVERYBODY
on the bottom row, was a leak.

The fact that Novak is the only one who put it into a paper doesn't matter.

Everybody on that bottom row had no business knowing she worked for the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. So, there was a conspiracy in the WH to expose a covert CIA agent.
A familiar question arises: What did the President know & when did he know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. True - but none of them should be prosecuted for it.
Not that I think you're saying it, but I've seen it on other threads.

I can't say that I like the current crop of journalists covering the White House very much, but getting tips and hearing classified information from officials isn't treason - publishing it (Novak) isn't treasonous, or even illegal, as well. I don't want to see MORE restrictions on the press, no matter how many of them I find personally distasteful just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Every American has the right to take a leak on any Bush Administration official!
Let's hope the secret service gets the message and does it for us. Afterall, they're the only ones withing piddling range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who told Grossman in the State Dept.? ......
Seems to me Grenier and Harlow screwed up by telling folks who "didn't need to know" anything about Valerie Plame. But who wrote that report?

I guess that's classified. DOH!!:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. State Dept INR had a rep at the Feb '02 CIA mtg where sending Wilson to Niger was discussed.
When Libby asked Grossman for info on Wilson's Niger trip, Grossman requested info from State INR (which had also debunked the Niger claims) and a memo was prepared which included info on the 2002 CIA meeting. The memo identified Valerie Wilson as a CIA WMD manager who was present at the meeting.

A copy of the declassified June 10 State Dept memo is available here in .pdf format: http://truthout.org/imgs.art_01/fordmemo.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why did Grenier and Harlow leak this info to Martin and Libby?
Do we know what prompted that? Was it a case of Libby and Martin approaching Grenier and Harlow fishing for info about Plame or did Grenier and Martin initiate the leak?

Looking at this chart its difficult not to see this as anything other a coordinated effort to out Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why stop with the A's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think I've ID'd ''Unknown.''


"Unk-Unk-Unk-noun?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC