Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Brooks says whether Valerie was covert or not is still a matter of dispute

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:35 PM
Original message
David Brooks says whether Valerie was covert or not is still a matter of dispute
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 05:39 PM by librechik
and references staunch little Victoria's claim that Valerie wasn't technically legally covert. Then he says he wishes the story were over.

Oh, why now? Just before your crazy little story hits rock bottom?

Then he mouths the foolish Joe Wilson Lied gambit.

He is soooooo over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was this Brooks and (Mark) Shields on the PBS News Hour? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yep--he is being foolish right now on the NewsHour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. So is his credibility
Jeez, these guys must be well paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Victoria's argument is the WH spin and Waxman publicly put Vicky on notice
....that he has ordered further investigations into her claim. She is full of shit IMHO because the way she put it the CIA is required to make a list of all of its covert agents and operators and furnish that list to anyone in government so that such officials won't out any of the agents.

That is absurd. Why would the CIA maintain a list of agents connecting those agents to the CIA if those agents are covert and in no way connected to the CIA and then give such a list to public governmental officials?

Hey, Mr Vice President, can you keep a secret? Good, here are all of our covert agents and their operators throughout the world. Now don't tell anyone, okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ah the famous NOC list
Watch out for Ethan Hunt....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. the absurdity of a list struck
me when she said it. She is a nasty, bitter woman.

Her entire explanation of the 'law' she helped write struck me that she was a chimpie 'signing statement' after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do you or anybody had an email connection to Waxman
We should all bombard him asking for an investigation into Toesing and why she is spreading the lie after the CIA and Plame verifed she was covert. I think dyed haired Vicky should be arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Brewster Jennings was not a Covert Operation
investigating WMD proliferation. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, what do Plame and the CIA know, anyway?
Victoria Toensing will sic Nancy Grace's Flaming Nostrils of Justice on you if you don't see it her way. And one look at David Brooks and you know you don't want that to happen to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. David Brooks is absolutely correct
It is still a matter of dispute for those people with the IQs of toaster ovens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Joe Wilson lied? So Saddam did get yellow cake from Niger?
And the U.S. was struck by an atomic bomb? Somehow, I must have missed the mushroom cloud excitement in my neighborhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because LIARS will ALWAYS dispute the TRUTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whether David Brooks is on acid is not a matter of dispute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. As the late great..
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 06:34 PM by sendero
... senator Patrick Moynihan once said "you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts".

Brooks seems to have problems with facts all around. He's either a liar or a moron, it doesn't really matter which, I take nothing he says seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. How they love to muddy the waters!
Now we have to spend our time disproving Brooks instead of going after Rove.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC