Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ARE YOU LIVING IN THE CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:30 AM
Original message
ARE YOU LIVING IN THE CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE?
Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US land and coastal borders.

The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This " Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas.

We urge you to call on Congress to hold hearings on and pass legislation to end these egregious violations of Americans' civil rights.



Fact Sheet on U.S. "Constitution Free Zone"
http://www.aclu.org/privacy/37293res20081022.html

http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/areyoulivinginaconstitutionfreezone.html

Whoa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Isn't that special
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. By the looks of it most of my state is
Fuck this shit. I don't recall the amendment to our Constitution that allows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Supreme Court OK'd this.
I live in Buffalo, and I'm pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. To which USSC decision are you referring? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Uh...dunno.
Not an expert, just saw a segment about the issue today, which included a quotation from the SCOTUS, something about probable cause requirements being "impractical" or something, for these highway stops. Of course, I'm sure it's being aggressively misinterpreted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. You are just full of information, aren't you?
Something this important and all you have is, "Uh...dunno", "something about probable cause...or something"

Lets all get some real facts in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I spent a while trying to find te specific line, but didn't have much luck.
The ACLU site, for instance, didn't have any kind of "this is what the other side say" info, which I found disappointing. I agree, I'd like to know myself. Just couldn't find it. Sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Of course not. They pulled this out of their ass.
This is just going to be one of those things where I have to disagree with the ACLU's statements, if not its objective. There hasn't been a new law or rule change to anything to do with the jurisdiction of customs or immigration officers. I checked. It's not a "constitution-free zone." Now, as to whether there has been an operational change (meaning that CBP has changed the way it operates within preexisting rules) it looks like they've set up a few more inland mobile checkpoints. This is being blown out of all proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wish the ACLU would stop with this.
It's misleading. The government isn't "assuming" any powers. Customs and border patrol have had authority within 100 miles of the border for practically forever. And it doesn't make the areas within their jurisdiction "constitution-free zones."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "practically forever" ??
The government doesn't have any power that the people haven't explicitly given them.. In light of the massive overreach of the Patriot Act I think it is well within our rights to reexamine things that you may have assumed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This has nothing to do with the PATRIOT act.
In fact, you will notice that in none of its material on this subject does the ACLU cite a specific piece of legislation or rules change being responsible for this situation. This is because there isn't one. The number of inland checkpoints has been increased, but this has been done under existing jurisdiction rules, not new ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Apparently then our laws rely too much on the personal ethics of the administration in charge
I hope President Obama will take us back to a time where we aren't ruled by fear. Home of the Brave right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I did not say it did. I said "in light of the overreach". . .
and you haven't told me where it's written that they CAN do this. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's the definition of "reasonable distance" from the border...
...within which border patrol agents have certain powers:

Reasonable distance defined here:
http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title08/8-1.0.1.2.57.0.1.1.html

The specifics of the powers that can be exercised within that reasonable distance are elsewhere in title VIII part 287 as I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. So this was written AFTER Customs was broken up?
So this is AFTER the DHS was cobbled together and ICE was created and hyper-militarized?

(2) Reasonable distance. The term reasonable distance, as used in section 287(a) (3) of the Act, means within 100 air miles from any external boundary of the United States or any shorter distance which may be fixed by the chief patrol agent for CBP, or the special agent in charge for ICE, or, so far as the power to board and search aircraft is concerned any distance fixed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. No, it's been that way forever.
The CFR was changed to put all of the DHS stuff in one place upon creation of DHS (it wouldn't have made sense to leave it scattered all over creation) but the 100 mile jurisdiction text has been around for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Get this: 97.4% of the population of the State of NY is "Constitution Free"
100% of theses states are in the Government's "Constitution Free Zone"
Connecticut
Delaware
DC
Florida
Hawaii
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Rhode Island

In these states, 50% or more of the people get to KEEP their Constitutional guarantees:
Alabama
Georgia
Idaho
Indiana
Minnesota
Mississippi
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Texas
West Virginia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why is this administration acting as if they will still be in control after the elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. better yet, how can they, not, still be in control
considering all the laws broken and lives lost

In a just world these war criminals would be marched straight to a lockup somewhere to possibly to never see daylight again. How can they not? And remain free
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. ...
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. After looking at Florida.....
that explains the 2000 Election:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. They don't bother me.
I have a special holographic sticker in my passport. They think I'm one of their supervisors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. We all have since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
machI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
24. As a matter of fact, I am. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
25. You got me for a minute. But I'm a caucasian woman! So it doesn't apply to me.
Edited on Fri Oct-24-08 04:59 AM by quantessd
I am truly sorry for all the rest of you non-whites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. Chicago is wrongly incuded in the map
Lake Michigan IS NOT A BORDER WITH CANADA! The orange area should go through michigan and northern wisconsin but NOT ILLINOIS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC