Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Designer: Palin Spending Strange

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:51 PM
Original message
Hillary Designer: Palin Spending Strange
CBS) CBS News has confirmed that the Republican National Committee spent up to $150,000 on what appears to be wardrobe and makeup spending at high end department stores for the GOP Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin.

But one of the most famous political fashion designers of the year, Susanna Chung Forest, who designed Hillary Clinton’s pantsuits says it would be unusual for a candidate as famous as Sarah Palin to need to buy clothes.

“Why do you need to pay for it?” Forest told CBS News from her boutique Susanna Beverly Hills saying that most designers would offer to clothe a candidate for free. “It’s an honor, you are going to design for someone who could be

the president of the United States,” noting that the exposure any designer would get from dressing someone as famous as Clinton or Palin would be worth much more.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/22/cbsnews_investigates/printable4539410.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. On a "simulated shopping spree" on another thread, I spent $63,417 on boots alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magdalena Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was wondering the same thing.
I always hear of celebrities and other high-profile figures getting free clothes - it's some of the best advertising designers can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the Shopping spree was really GOP $$$ to pay the fees for hiding her shit in Alaska.
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 03:59 PM by Blaze Diem
Shopping Spree aka hush money
About the way the GOP operates isn't it?

S'pose the kids needed to be dressed also, then there's Tawd's suits and shoes that he'll probably never wear again, back in Alaska riding his snowmobile.
Sarah's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. it does raise questions.....
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 04:00 PM by spanone
chris matthews opened his show with it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. There probably wasn't enough time to have clothes designed for
her. If the decision of Palin was as impulsive as has been reported, she probably came down from Alaska with a suitcase full of inappropriate clothes and needed new ones immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ya, kinda warm in the lower 48 for Muckluks at that time.
I still suspect hush money..for some darn reason.
Maybe its just the normal scenario with the republicons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Considering Palin also knows how to hide or adjust public funds, it
probably has to do with use (or misuse) of campaign funds used for 'other purposes'.

hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. i'm not so sure such exposure would be worth much -- i think it would be toxic
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 04:10 PM by pitohui
for one thing the lady is frumpy in her fake reading glasses (she doesn't know you take reading glasses off when you're not reading) and her fake quasi-1980s beehive

we are not talking about a fashion icon here

we're talking about somebody only a baptist grandmother might mistake as fashionable and i don't think baptist granny is going to spring for designer duds

a hillary endorsement yes? there are followers who are actually bright, have money, and might actually need professional outfits like hillary's for their jobs

but the followers of palin are by definition losers w.out jobs who pretend that they are voluntarily stay at home moms for jeebus -- not a crowd that is going to spend for professional business clothing for women -- where would they wear such things?

maybe i'm naive but i see no value and indeed a loss of value if i was a designer and my name was associated with palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maye her only offer from designers were the FLDS ladies.
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 06:13 PM by Blaze Diem
That'd be cute with her beehive.
Like Little House on the Prairie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC