Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repeat of flu outbreak of 1918 could cost up to 10 % of global production and over 2 trillion Euros

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:14 PM
Original message
Repeat of flu outbreak of 1918 could cost up to 10 % of global production and over 2 trillion Euros
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 01:25 PM by RGBolen
October 22, 2008
Insurer: Flu Outbreak Could Cause Global Recession
A repeat of the Spanish flu outbreak of 1918 is expected to cause a global recession on a scope ranging from 1 to 10 percent of global gross domestic product, according to a report released October 17 by Lloyd’s of London’s emerging risk team.

The Lloyd’s report, “Pandemic—Potential Insurance Impacts,” concludes that a pandemic is inevitable, with historic recurrence rates of 30 to 50 years. The report focuses on the impact of a global pandemic on the business community and, in particular, the insurance markets.

The impact on some classes of insurance business, namely life and health, would be adverse, Lloyd’s finds. Many forms of liability covers, including general liability, directors and officers, medical malpractice, as well as products offering business interruption and event cancellation could be triggered, the report states.


http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/25/85/77.php

Flu Pandemic May Cost World Economy Up to $3 Trillion (Update3)

By Jason Gale

Oct. 17 (Bloomberg) -- A flu pandemic could kill 71 million people worldwide and push the global economy into a ``major global recession'' costing more than $3 trillion, according to raised estimates by the World Bank of a worst-case scenario.

A slump in tourism, transportation and retail sales, as well as workplace absenteeism and lower productivity caused by a ``severe'' outbreak, may cut global gross domestic product by 4.8 percent, the Washington-based bank said in an internal report updated last month and obtained by Bloomberg News today. Economic modeling by the bank in June 2006 estimated GDP would drop by 3.1 percent, or about $2 trillion.

The spread of the H5N1 avian-influenza strain across Asia, Africa and Europe prompted the development of vaccines and the slaughter of poultry from Indonesia to the U.K. Measures to avoid infection would generate most of the costs, said the report, which used simulations to underline the importance of global preparations for a pandemic sparked by bird flu. Human cases of H5N1 infection have fallen by half this year as controls of outbreaks in poultry improve.

``Even with such efforts, an eventual human pandemic at some unknown point in the future is virtually inevitable,'' Andrew Burns, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe and Hans Timmer, economists at the bank, wrote in the report.

Pandemic Threat

The threat of a flu pandemic, raised by the World Health Organization in 2003, persists because the H5N1 virus is entrenched in parts of Asia and Africa, the World Bank said. Such a contagion would start when a novel influenza A-type virus, to which almost no one has natural immunity, emerges and begins spreading. Experts believe that the so-called 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic, which may have killed as many as 50 million people, began when an avian flu virus jumped to people.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=ashmCPWATNwU&refer=canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. i don't think we need the flu at this point... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's all about the impact on production.
Not the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Too many people on this planet anyway.
The world could use a good pandemic taking out 3-4 billion people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like any species
that over reproduces, nature has a way of kicking the population back. I think the death toll will be larger though in first world countries because of loss of knowledge on how to survive on local natural foods/plants in the event of a breakdown of food distribution in a pandemic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC