Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is anyone familiar with Eugenics or Sterilization history in the United States?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Irish Girl Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 09:51 AM
Original message
Is anyone familiar with Eugenics or Sterilization history in the United States?
I'm a twenty-something female - still quite a young kip - but found Eugenics and Sterilization both fascinating and disturbing. This is a slice of our history I never even knew existed. The United States was the first country to concertedly undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics.

From Wikipedia on "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics">Eugenics":


Eugenics is a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention. Throughout history, eugenics has been regarded by its various advocates as a social responsibility, an altruistic stance of a society, meant to create healthier, stronger and/or more intelligent people, to save resources, and lessen human suffering.

Earlier proposed means of achieving these goals focused on selective breeding, while modern ones focus on prenatal testing, genetic counseling, birth control, in vitro fertilization, and genetic engineering. Opponents argue that eugenics is immoral. Historically, a minority of eugenics advocates have used it as a justification for state-sponsored discrimination, forced sterilization of persons deemed genetically defective, and the killing of institutionalized populations. Eugenics was also used to rationalize certain aspects of the Holocaust.

Eugenics became an academic discipline at many colleges and universities. Funding was provided by prestigious sources such as the Rockefeller Foundation, the Kellogg Foundation, the Carnegie Institution of Washington, and the Harriman family. Since the postwar period, both the public and the scientific communities have associated eugenics with Nazi abuses, such as enforced racial hygiene, human experimentation, and the extermination of undesired population groups.

Eugenics in the United States (1890s–1978)

The most significant era of eugenic sterilization was between 1907 and 1963, when over 64,000 individuals were forcibly sterilized under eugenic legislation in the United States. When Nazi administrators went on trial for war crimes in Nuremberg after World War II, they justified the mass sterilizations (over 450,000 in less than a decade) by citing the United States as their inspiration.


As a younger American, I'm very interested to know if anyone remembers this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's a book that you absolutely must read:
"War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race," by Edwin Black.

http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, and Margaret Sanger was a eugenist
Ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. that seems to have been a part of the whole Nazi thing too
and most of it's American supporters, Like dumbaya's grandad Prescott...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Margaret Sanger was also a pioneer in reproductive rights.
Her main issue was that poor women should have the same reproductive options as wealthy women. Even though it was illegal, wealthy women were getting abortions from real doctors, and had access to contraceptives, while poor women had to go to back alley abortionists and had little access to contraceptives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Didn't he write 'IBM and the Holocaust'?
Featured in the movie,"The Corporation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. In Virginia they still had some laws on the books
about sterilizing the retarded into the early sixties. I don't know the particulars but I'm sure that Virginia, like other Southern states had a lot of these type of laws that were swept out with the Civil Rights movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Buck vs. Bell
http://karmak.org/archive/2004/06/buckvbell.html

May 2nd marked the 75th anniversary of a nadir in American law and society. On this day in 1927, the United States Supreme Court upheld the concept of eugenic sterilization for people considered genetically "unfit." The Court's decision, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., included the infamous phrase "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Upholding Virginia's sterilization statute provided the green light for similar laws in 30 states, under which an estimated 65,000 Americans were sterilized without their own consent or that of a family member.

To commemorate the event, the state of Virginia erected a roadside marker in Charlottesville, home town of Carrie Buck, the plaintiff of the Supreme Court case. Carrie, like her mother Emma, had been committed to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded in Lynchburg, Virginia at age 17. Carrie and Emma were both judged to be "feebleminded" and promiscuous, primarily because they had both had borne children out of wedlock. Carrie's child, Vivian, was judged to be "feebleminded" at seven months of age. Hence, three generations of "imbeciles" became the "perfect" family for Virginia officials to use as a test case in favor of the eugenic sterilization law enacted in 1924.


more at link

-----------------------------------------------------

It's also how the federal government got the land for Shenandoah National Park. They said the people were backwards and just took their land from them.

http://www.jstor.org/pss/1125355
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Prescott Bush was an advocate of eugenics in the late '40's and into the '50's.
If you google Bush and eugenics you will get a lot of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Or, just read this:
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm

George Bush - The Unauthorized Biography.

Lots of info on Prescott and eugenics here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. His experiment failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act of 1924
Virginia's Eugenical Sterilization Act provided for involuntary sterilization of anyone deemed an imbecile or feeble-minded. The famous Supreme Court case Buck vs. Bell was the test case for this law. Along with Dred Scott and Plessy vs. Ferguson, these three decisions are considered among the Court’s worst. In accordance with the Sterilization Act, “biologically defective or deficient” groups were given the choice of segregation or sterilization. Carrie Buck (of the Buck vs. Bell case), her mother, and her daughter were all sterilized in accordance with this law.

http://www.hsl.virginia.edu/historical/eugenics/3-buckvbell.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Did two papers on this in college.
Very disturbing time in American history and it was the Nazi's justification for The Final Solution.

Buck v. Bell - "two generations of imbeciles is enough"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I thought it was 3 generations
And that was said by none other than Oliver Wendell Holmes.

There's a great discussion about this issue and the general theory of genetics and IQ in Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man. A must read book, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. You're right. 3 generations.
It's been a while since college. Mind like a steel trap...a rusty steel trap....

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. I remember either during Nixon/Ford or the early Carter years that the
republicons were talking about sterilization as a way to slow down welfare. They wanted laws enacted to force welfare mothers sterilized after 2 or 3 children. I'm not sure if it was 1 state or all 50, I am going on what was being said by republicon parents of friends. Of course that was before the religious right wing nuts came into power.

If memory serves me, I think thats what lead to the democratic push for birth control to the poor. It'd kind of hard to remember as there was a lot going on back then and it seems that was swept under the rug and forgotten during the Reagan years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. My dad did a post on eugenics a bit back.
He posts under the name of Time For Change and did a pretty interesting post on the subject. You can read about it http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Time%20for%20change/312">here.

The Opening of the Floodgates of the Eugenics Movement in the U.S.: The Sterilization of Carrie Buck
Posted by Time for change in General Discussion
Wed May 21st 2008, 06:20 PM
By learning about the tyrannies of the past, hopefully Americans will learn to recognize it when they see it.
The eugenics movement in the United States is a sordid story of unbounded arrogance, hypocrisy, classism, racism, and blatant disregard for the principles upon which our country was founded. Perhaps it would not be worth learning about if we as a nation were in no danger of repeating similar atrocities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. you can also look up the Tuskegee Experiments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doodler71 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Lack of reproductive freedom... Lack of choice...
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 10:51 AM by Doodler71
This is the side of allowing the government to control individual's reproductive rights, that right to lifers don't understand or talk about.

Freedom of choice... Pro-choice...It's not just about abortion. It's a very slippery slope back to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Planned parenthood, Margaret Sanger, Frreedom of choice: irony overload
PP was founded as a pro-eugenics organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doodler71 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Color me pink... I didn't know that. Irony indeed. (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. It continues, but it's oftentimes couched as protection for the developmentally disabled people
e.g., they don't understand sex and the consequences, they couldn't handle being pregnant, etc., so they are sterilized to protect themselves. This usually involves some evidence of behavior, like kissing, etc., that is pointed to as the basis for fear of sex occurring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. It was only fairly recently that they stopped
sterilizing native americans when they could. There are still people out there who went into the hospital for an appendectomy and came out missing other bits as well. I think it finally stopped in the 60's and 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here's an archived DU thread that I started last New Year's Day
Edited on Wed Oct-22-08 12:01 PM by bobthedrummer
"January 1, 1934 'The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring' took effect" (1-1-2008)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2570336

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Three generations of imbeciles are enough
Just about the most chilling thing ever in a Supreme Court opinion.

(And also applies to the Bush family, btw...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Puerto Rican Women Sterilization Project:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. As an aside...
As an aside, just last week we had a thread locked because the OP was proposing eugenics (though calling it something warm and fuzzy).




Two books that may help you out (one pro and one con-- what I consider the best way to prep yourself on a new discipline)

Eugenics: In Defense of Human Enhancement, by Nicholas Agar (quasi-pro)

and

Eugenic Nation by Alexandra Minna Stern (con)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. "My dear lady- what if the child should get my body and YOUR brains?"
..George Bernard Shaw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grammysandie Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. More books
"Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America's Quest for Racial Purity" by Harry Bruinius covered, among other topics, an especially creepy aspect of the eugenics movement: Fitter Families contests.

"In Reckless Hands: Skinner v. Oklahoma and the Near-Triumph of American Eugenics" by Victoria Nourse is on my to-read list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amelie Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Remember it? Hell, it was only a month ago in my state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Puerto Rico, Where Sterilization of Women Became "La Operacion"
http://www.cwpe.org/node/66

Puerto Rico, under the United States since 1898 when it was ceded by Spain, has long been a laboratory for U.S. initiated social, economic and cultural policies. Beginning in the late thirties, privately funded foundations based in the United States, and later, the Puerto Rican government, with U.S. government funds, have promoted sterilization of women as a way of limiting population growth. In the forties, just when women were joining the work force in large numbers as industrialization opened up job opportunities, sterilizations were provided at minimal or no cost. While women suffered from lack of safe, legal abortion services, other methods of contraception, day care services, and health care services, they were offered sterilizations.

The results of deliberate policies, more concerned with curbing population than with meeting women's and children's needs, were high regret rates among the unprecedented nearly forty percent of women who by 1968 were sterilized. More than one third of women surveyed did not know sterilizations were permanent! Many approached sterilization decisions from mistaken notions that sterilization would improve their health, sexual life or marriage relationship. Many found depression, complications of surgery and abandonment by husbands as unexpected results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Read DUer Octafish's stuff
He covers the eugenics movement and the bush familys involvment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Eugenics and the NAZIs - The California Connection; American Children Used in Radiation Experiments
Thank you, conscious evolution. Your help has lightened the load, immensely.

Know your BFEE: Eugenics and the NAZIs - The California Connection

Know your BFEE: American Children Used in Radiation Experiments

BTW: Welcome to DU, coincidenceor... When it comes to politics, FDR said there are no coincidences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes, I am familiar, in fact, beauty pageants started as a quasi-eugenics "county fair" thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good chapters in "Making Sex" by Thomas Laqueur on racial and class-based sterilization.
Eugenics lost favor after WWII for obvious reasons. Eugenics is far from out of fashion, however. In a way it blended perfectly with the hystericized positivism of mid-century America (the common choice of women, African-Americans, and the laboring class for medical experimentation in the mid-century suggests this.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. The Nazis got the idea from the United States.
A lot of racist "scholarship" still continues. They don't call it eugenics, but that's what it is. There's a jerk at Harvard who pumps out this crap. And the guy who published _The Bell Curve_ some years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. Unfortunately, it's not quite history yet
at least not in David Dukkke's old district in lily-white Metairie, La.

http://adrastos.blog-city.com/malaka_of_the_day_john_labruzzo.htm

It seems that not all local pols with Italian surnames are running for District Attorney. State Rep. John LaBruzzo (R-Metry) has other things on his mind. LaBruzzo is advocating a plan to pay poor folks to get their tubes tied to save on "welfare costs." LINK. It's a pity that LaBruzzo doesn't have a phallic name but he's definitely a dickhead who deserves to be beaten with a plaster schmeckle as well as a malaka of epic proportions.

LaBruzzo represents the district that once elected Fuhrer wannabe and plastic surgery connoisseur, David Duke. No surprise there. It is, however, disappointing that someone with roots in Southern Europe is advocating what amounts to neo-eugenics. Early 20th Century American Eugenicists favored sterilizing as many folks of "non-native" stock as feasible. That meant that *my* Greek relations were as likely to have been on the...uh...chopping block as those of Mr. LaBruzzo.

Mr. LaBruzzo *claims* that he just wants to help "those" people and save the taxpayers some money. I'm sure getting his picture on the front page of the Picayune had nothing to do with it. I'm sure he's enjoying the comments at NOLA.com as well. I only skimmed them, I have a delicate digestive system and rabid bigotry upsets my stomach....

Obviously, LaBruzzo's bill provides an *incentive* for the "wrong sort of people" to be sterilized instead of making it mandatory but the intent is the same. Basing public policy on bigotry and stereotypes is another form of imbecility. And imbecility and malakatude are synonymous so that's why State Rep. John LaBruzzo is malaka of the day.


(malaka n. (Gk.) wanker; jerkoff)

Malaka LaBruzzo was eventually stripped of his position as vice chair of the health committee. As for me, I can think of at least two other (small) things he should be stripped of... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
35. You can get the journals of the Eugenics Society on eBay from time to time.
I think they were around til the 70s though most popular in the 1920s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC