Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is "Socialist" an old codeword for "Black"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:23 PM
Original message
Is "Socialist" an old codeword for "Black"?
Not sure if that would work for people who weren't around for Hoovers reign and the civil right's movement.

http://voices.kansascity.com/node/2493


Shame on McCain and Palin for using an old code word for black
By Lewis Diuguid, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist

The "socialist" label that Sen. John McCain and his GOP presidential running mate Sarah Palin are trying to attach to Sen. Barack Obama actually has long and very ugly historical roots.

J. Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI from 1924 to 1972, used the term liberally to describe African Americans who spent their lives fighting for equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think so...

Never heard it used that way. Just an "insult" to liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Socialist translates to communism to many people
who do not know there is a difference between the two. And Communism is the code word for the cold war and the villains who will kill democracy. So on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. In a way it is because "communism" is shorthand for "welfare." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. You can stretch connections, but the word..

....is not a "codeword" for blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. Not for you it isn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, it's just another term that they don't understand
like "liberal"; they know not of what they speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. Ding! YOU nailed it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. Exactly
Raising taxes on the top 2 brackets to 1990's levels is not "socialist."

Expanding access to health care for the uninsured is not "socialist."

If anything, Obama will save a the economic component of liberalism (free markets) from its own excesses, just like FDR did.

Radicalism (including socialism) has never been particularly resonant in America. The bigger threat to liberty as we have known it in America has always come from the inegalitarian/ascriptive/exclusionary/racist (whatever you want to call it) strain of American political culture from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoTheo Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, this article is dead on
I hadn't thought of that in years until I read this article earlier tonigh, but that was the polite way to phrase it instead of using the ever popular epithet, Ni**er Lover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. and you heard it used this way??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoTheo Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. You bet!!!
I lived through the civil rights movement in America and remember it clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
43. Yes but not just against blacks, American Indians and other races fell into that catagory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hoover wasnt the Lord of Language ...
Edited on Tue Oct-21-08 08:29 PM by Trajan
Socialist was bandied about for those who promoted liberal policies, such as those legislated during FDR's New Deal administration ....

For the RW nutcases: Socialism = ANY sort of social legislation, even feeding the starving or schooling the ignorant ....

Hell ... Even the development of common infrastructure, like roads and bridges, could be considered 'socialist', by the idiotic RW, who prefer private ownership of every aspect of public life ...

Hoover held sway in some aspects of the public sphere, but only as much as the current director ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. They are grasping at straws, hoping some label will stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Its a fear-smear ...
... trying to make "Joe Sixpack" think that Obama wants to steal all his hard-earned money and give it to the "lazy no good bums who won't get a job", rather than levelling the playing field by making it a little more difficult for the millionaires to gank the system and become billionaires while the rest of us starve.

Its an appeal to people's most selfish instincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's code for beret wearing, pot smoking, go-teed, Molotov cocktail throwing radicals
Interchangeable in McCain/Palin's feeble mind with 'commie' and yeah...shame on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Code word for "Jews" if anything..

..many of the most active socialists back in the day were Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. By the fifties, the Jews were promoted to "Commies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yup. That is what the 'code' stood for 'in the day.'
Then, as the poster says, upgraded to "communist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I remember the hatred directed toward Jews during the Civil Rights era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Bolshevik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. I was going to say that even before I opened the thread...
looks like you beat me to it! You're absolutely right--Jews have been associated with the Left since at least the 1930s. The PTB hated them not only (or mainly) because of their religion, but because so many union organizers were Jewish.

Hah...I just now remembered what my avatar looks like! I've had it for a few months and don't even think about it any more. It's a tribute to the union guys and gals in my very typical Jewish family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Though it may have been used prior to 1924, it was
Edited on Tue Oct-21-08 09:22 PM by Cerridwen
used to attack any government defined "radicals," women's rights and peace movement activists. Calling pro-populist and/or anti-status quo activists "unAmerican" is a "time honored" tradition in the US. Other countries have their own un/anti {country name} scapegoats. It was used during the Civil Rights Movement to try to paint the movement and its leaders as un/anti-American.

Below is one example of its use:

The "notorious spider-chart" propelled, as well as initiated, many "red" accusations from the Daughters of the American Revolution, the American Defense Society, and The Woman Patriot. When the Women's Joint Congressional Commission investigated the source of this chart, it discovered that Brigadier General Amos A. Fries's assistant, Lucia Maxwell of the Chemical Warfare Bureau, compiled it. The discovery of government involvement in the chart's origins aroused the protest of Carrie Chapman Catt (see Document 4). The chart's title was taken from a report on seditious activities compiled by the Lusk Committee in 1920. State Senator Lusk of New York headed this committee which conducted raids on "radical" organizations and investigated alleged radicals.

The chart accuses the leading women reformers named in the boxes along its margins of a variety of socialist and communist affiliation. Some of these are true, most are distorted, and some are untrue. For example, Florence Kelley did not advocate "the gradual abolition of property privileges." The chart links these names with fourteen mainstream women's organizations, such as the League of Women Voters, and two mainstream umbrella organizations, the Women's Joint Congressional Committee, and the National Council for Prevention of War.

The Women's Joint Congressional Committee was formed in 1920 to advance the legislative agenda of the women's organizations named in its central column. The National Council for the Prevention of War was one of three peace organizations formed between 1919 and 1925, the high point of peace activism in American History. Those committed to internationalism formed organizations to support the League of Nations, those committed to pacifism joined WILPF and the War Resisters League. Liberal reformers who affiliated with both internationalism and pacifism organized the National Council for Prevention of War.<8>

<snip> link. Scroll down to see the chart Note the title of the chart.




Poison Propaganda

By Carrie Chapman Catt

Some time ago insidious comments upon all educational peace movements and their leaders began to appear in the press. In 1922 there was a widespread circularization of the newspapers with a fanciful declaration that the "Law, not War" day celebrated in many cities was being financed by Moscow, and an especially virulent attack was made upon Mr. Libby, Quaker, of the National Council for the Prevention of War, who was promoting these demonstrations. Many papers reprinted the matter. In 1923 the American Defense Society sent out similar propaganda declaring that Russian communism and American efforts to promote peace were working hand in hand.

From time to time similar attacks have been made upon individuals, any individuals, who have appealed to public opinion on behalf of world peace. The charge has been implied in these stories that various women's organizations, well known and composed of highly honorable memberships, were being financed by Moscow because they were promoting peace sentiment.

On March 15 1924, the Dearborn Independent carried an amazing story, continued in the number of March 22, under the starting title "Are Women's Clubs Used by Bolshevists?" These articles asserted that the masses women within the many well-known organizations were being weakly played upon by a few women in "key positions" who were linked to world communism and its aim to overturn all governments. The second instalment was accompanied by a chart compiled from the Lusk report and connecting the highest and best organizations with socialist-pacifist activities. A definite attack was made upon the Women's Joint Congressional Committee, its seventeen component organizations and many of its members.

<snip> to what happened next



The repubs just keep using what works.

edit: one too many commas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. not directly, but they did use the "welfare" word,
which is rightwing-speak for "shiftless n-----r"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. I doubt it.
Edited on Tue Oct-21-08 09:48 PM by Canuckistanian
Black were not involved in the progressive struggles between capitalism and socialism in any major way.

I can't see any reason to connect the two situations in anyone's minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered when he started focusing on worker's rights.
Edited on Tue Oct-21-08 09:55 PM by yardwork
That's why he was in Memphis that day - to address a group of mostly white workers who were trying to unionize. The Southern establishment has a deep and abiding fear of unions and any kinds of worker's rights. After all, this was where slavery was legal until the 1860s.

In 1979 a group of Communist Workers Party organizers was murdered by Klan and Neo-Nazis in Greensboro, NC. They were attempting to organize black workers.

Edited to add: Despite video evidence of the murders taking place, the murderers were acquitted in two trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Docente Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. yes it is, and so it's "skinny"
And "good", and "red', and "tall".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Soon it might have to be prefaced with Mr President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Of course it is...
At this point, every word they try to pin on Obama is a codeword for black, because that's all they have left to run on.

However, socialism is also the direct referrent for a thing called socialism, another RW swear word with a long history.

It's all one web.

Elite* = Liberal = Socialist = Communist = Black or Pro-Black = Traitor = Un-American

*=intellectual, egghead, gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Nah, it means commie and foreigner, but not black in my experience. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. Commie, liberal, socialist = rightist propaganda smears
Jesus was a socialist!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. No, it's a new codeword for "communist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
26. NO, It's A Codeword for "RED" as in "RED SCARE" It's McCarthy Era BS n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. no, sorry, it's been used against all on the left, even white leftists
that it may also have been used against civil rights activists is irrelevant. Since in the public mind socialist==communist==USSR==evil, then naturally it is used as a smear against any group that conservatives were trying to oppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
29. NO! Socialist is a form of government . A lot of European countries incorporate socialistic ideals


into their governments. Really, it is no a bad word. The trouble is the Rebubs have their base confused and thinking it mean communism. It is being used as a scare tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
32. One of the things most hated about Communists...

back when there were actual American communists, was their association with the black struggle. There were a lot of black party members and communists generally were derided as "n****-lovers." Of all groups on the left, the Communist Party was most open and unapologetic in allying with black movements, often providing lawyers and PR machinery for court struggles, as with the Scottsboro Boys. You can argue what the party's motivations were, but it's the simple fact. I don't know what echoes this may still have today, 60 years and more later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
33. No, it's an old codeword for liberal
Concocted by the likes of Joe McCarthy and later Jesse Helms, neither of whom knew the difference between a New Dealer and a Stalinist, although it's plainly obvious to any intelligent person.

In the hands of old Southern segregationists, including the unlamented Senator Helms, the word Communist could be a codeword for Black or liberal or anybody else who supported the end of Jim Crow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. If called a Socialist, I wear the label with pride. Fuck em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Whether you're a socialist or not, take it with a grain of salt
The label is being bandied about by people who don't really know what a socialist is, beyond someone who pisses them off.

Muslim is the latest codeword, especially when "accusing" the President-in-waiting of being one. If they really knew anything about Islam, then they would know that Muslim isn't even a smear, as General Powell so eloquently pointed out Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. My blood is from the Mideast. There's even a town in Iran with my
surname. Though a "genetic" Atheist, I respect the sincere believer.


A genetic Atheist is a person who has a visceral reaction to belief in the supernatural. They are unable to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
36. Not unless Kerry, Gore and Clinton are black. It's a codeword for "Democrat".
Anyone who doesn't support the drowning of the state in a bathtub gets called a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. code for Democrats are going to take your money & give it to lazy people
Race has nothing to do with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. It seems to be a new code word for black. Because, thank God, all the old code words
for "black" are now words that intelligent, good-hearted people of goodwill justifiably recoil from in disgust and revulsion. The repukes know that by using those old codes words, they'll gain the unswerving dog-loyalty of the 20% or so of the Sieg Heilers in this country, and lose everybody else.

Ask any one of those idjits to define "socialism", and there isn't one of them who could do it. Code words are for brainless idiots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. Wev'e been dominated by tyrrannical socialist for the last eight years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
41. no I think it is code for "un-American" and is thrown in along with "pals around with terrorist,"
Hussein= might be a Muslim.

When it comes to the freeptard wing of the Republican party which is after all the majority of the rank-and-file activist Republicans, they truly seem to believe in a conspiracy theory about Sen. Obama being the Manchurian candidate of some evil foreign influence. They just have not decided whether he is the Manchurian candidate of the Third International (which no longer exist) or is he the Manchurian candidate of Al Qaida. Perhaps they believe he is both and don't know that is contradictory.

I suspect the official McCain campaign simply believes that they need to keep throwing out various terms in an attempt to cast doubt on Sen. Obama's "Americaness" and to fire up their most enthusiastic supporters in the far right of the Republican Party who have always been for the most part Birch Society type right-wing conspiracy theorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. No, and I think the article is using faulty logic.
At one point in time in this country the idea that people should be treated equally regardless of their skin color was radical idea, and only radicals embraced it. The Socialist Party (and the Communist Party) embraced civil rights before the rest of the country. It eventually became something that the "mainstream" accepted. And I don't know about the other three people referenced in the article, but Martin Luther King and W.E.B. Dubois were both Socialists. Civil Rights, like minimum wage and the eight-hour work day, is just one of many things that Socialist are not given proper credit for.

There's nothing wrong with Socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
45. No. Total fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. Not Being Used That Way Right Now Whatsoever.
Since not a single person who would hear it right now would think about racism after having heard it, it would be a bit ridiculous to assert that is how they're intending it to be taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. That's what I was thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. In a sense it always was.
The major, unspoken opposition to socialism was its appeal to racial equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC