Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AZ-03: Shadegg Caught Lying in Lost Credit Card Coverup part 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:12 PM
Original message
AZ-03: Shadegg Caught Lying in Lost Credit Card Coverup part 2
http://swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3577

We posted earlier about the bizarre case of Arizona GOP Rep. John Shadegg's campaign credit card being discovered on the floor of the Arizona Democratic Party's headquarters. Shadegg's campaign rushed out an email in response saying that a "volunteer" accidentally dropped the card while paying for an Obama bumper sticker (on a total whim). That seemed like a pretty odd explanation (to be generous), but the Arizona Democratic Party just rushed out this release exposing a few holes in that story. Once again, here is the release in full:


Lost and Found, Part Two: The TRUTH About John Shadegg's Campaign Credit Card
John Shadegg's campaign isn't being honest.

MYTH: According to both John Shadegg's campaign manager and spokeswoman, a campaign "volunteer" accidently dropped John Shadegg's campaign credit card at an Arizona Democratic Party office while purchasing a bumper sticker. (AP, 10/20/08; PolitickerAZ, 10/20/08)

FACT: Shadegg's so-called "volunteer," Ryan Anderson, is actually Shadegg's deputy campaign manager. (Yellow Sheet Report, 9/10/08)

MYTH: Shadegg's campaign "volunteer" entered the Democratic office to purchase a bumper sticker. (AP, 10/20/08; PolitickerAZ, 10/20/08)

FACT: Shadegg's deputy campaign manager did not purchase a bumper sticker. The Democratic Party requires that individuals fill out contribution forms when they buy bumper stickers, but has no record of a purchase by Ryan Anderson.

STATEMENT: "John Shadegg's campaign is being dishonest," said Maria Weeg, Executive Director of the Arizona Democratic Party. "Shadegg's deputy campaign manager entered our office, likely to spy on supporters of Bob Lord's campaign for change and attempt to obtain confidential information on Lord's strategy. Congressman John Shadegg should make clear whether he condones his campaign's behavior and whether he will continue to employ the individuals responsible for spying on the people of Arizona."

NEW QUESTIONS:

1) Why would an employee of both John Shadegg's congressional office and his campaign provide a "volunteer" with the campaign's credit card?

2) Why did John Shadegg's campaign claim that Ryan Anderson is a "volunteer" when in fact he is Shadegg's deputy campaign manager?

3) Why would John Shadegg's deputy campaign manager purchase a Democratic bumper sticker?

4) Did John Shadegg's deputy campaign manager access any information in the office or remove any materials - and, if so, will he return this information and materials?

5) Does Congressman John Shadegg condone his campaign's behavior and will he continue to employ the individuals responsible for spying on the people of Arizona?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was it careless or a lame plant?
Were they hoping somebody in Lord's office would try and use the card and then make a huge fuss about it?

That would certainly fit Republican projection wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Lame plant- classic Rovian strategery.
The plot was foiled by the one thing they never expected:
honest people.

They weren't prepared for HONESTY, because it doesn't exist
in their worldview. They genuinely think that "doing the right thing"
is just another bunch of empty rhetoric that can be used to SCAM people.

They were no more prepared for an honest response to their trap
than they were prepared for interference from Leprechauns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. That sounds like Rove! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. My, my, my
The desperation just comes off in waves, doesn't it? My guess is it was a clumsy frame-up job. Was there any scotch tape on the door locks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd say they were "busted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Should they look for any planted "bugs?" You remember once Karl Rove planted bugs in his OWN office
and accused the Democrats of having put them there!

Thanks for posting this information. It's very, VERY interesting.

John Shaddegg looks completely oily, dishonest. Who on earth would VOTE for him?

http://upload.wikimedia.org.nyud.net:8090/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/JohnShadegg.jpg/160px-JohnShadegg.jpg http://images.politico.com.nyud.net:8090/global/080422_housegop.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. "Who on earth would VOTE for him?"
"John Shaddegg looks completely oily, dishonest."

A good portion of the Phoenix area is oily and dishonest.

People move here for low taxes, few regulations and many gated communities. Scams are a dime a dozen here, and they can get away with it.

Oh yeah, and Arizona was a Confederate state that elected a racist governor and refused to celebrate MLK Day as late as the 1980s. That probably has something to do with it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC