Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame OFFICIAL #8

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:39 AM
Original message
Plame OFFICIAL #8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. are you saying there is no report?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Original message
"There was already an outside investigation taking place, a criminal inv.,
that's why we didn't investigate"

paraphrasing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. So now its clear at least from 2004 on there was no Internal White House Investigation
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Silly, how do they investigate themselves??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Bush lied, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Guess that means the WH can talk about it then! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R - Thanks for keeping up, helderheid
I much appreciate it.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Original message
my pleasure!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cummings kicks ass!
Was there no investigation? "Not in my office"

Uh oh Bush. You lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. No shit....he is MELTING this guy! Wow!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. TA DAAA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. You're doing a heckuva job Knodell!
Does ANYONE in this fucking White House do their job??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. That's a very easy question to answer.. NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
103. Not only no, but they do their best to undermine the people
that sincerely wish to do their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. One of your main objectives is to make sure these kind of things
DONT Happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. We had a breach on top of a breach!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Did you look into it at all?
"No."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. Elijah Cummings is calling all manner of bullshit today.....
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Oooh, smack smack SMACK.
And the CHAIRMAN steps in "just to pin this down".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is his name Knodell or No Tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. oh, he's telling! That NOTHING WAS DONE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. Knodell is squirming
from ELIJAH questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ohmigod, Cummings: A breach on top of a breach
This White House is so fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. I feel like I can breathe again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
21. Oh-- Bringing up what the President said
Ouch, that had to smart....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Original message
Waxman
Do you know if there was an investigation?

Because the Whitehouse said they were going to investigate.....zing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Oooooooo!
"The President said there would be an investigation".

Yeah, right!! And monkeys are gonna fly out of my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. They are soooo screwed.
:toast:

Am I correct in that the WH still has not conducted an investigation?

Yes Sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. Unbelievable!!! WTF? Was there an investigation or did this guy
just get the job and never show up at the office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. He's doing a heckava job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
59. Why unbelievable?
We all knew very well that there wasn't a finger lifted to flip over the rocks that housed these slugs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #59
91. They didn't need to flip any rocks...they already knew every player
and their roles! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. His job is just to collect salary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Apparently so! They canned his predecessor 'at the pleasure of the pres'
We need to know who that guy was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
28. The Waxman socks * in the kisser.
Recalls that * said he'd get to the bottom of it and we hear instead from this guy that there never was an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. This is unbelievable!
I'm shaking here! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. I'd LOVE to be the E-mail administrator in that place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. Waxman trying to nail
it to Bush's door
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Methinks some folks at the WH are currently sitting
in offices talking to their lawyers. No work getting done there today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. Nailed Knodell is nailed!!! No investigation when they said they were investigating
The smoking gun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. If the Pubbies intentionally boycotted this hearing...
...they made a hell of a mistake, IMO. Not that they could do a lot, but of it, but I would guess that they would at least have tried to do some damage control on this.

This committee is burying the WH today, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. At this point I think it is
only about CYA and they are only interested in their own asses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
75. Boy...
...I don't know what the hell they can do at this time to even begin to cover their asses on this one. Simply put: NO INVESTIGATION. PERIOD. All the lies about finding out about this and NO one knew...yada, yada...how in the hell does the WH cover for these FACTS??? No way, IMO!

Man, Diane is NAILING this guy now....he looks more like he is confessing and NOT testifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #75
101. I mean the Congress critters laying low
rather than sticking ther own asses in a sling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Original message
Typical strategy
for a bad day hearing? They usually appoint one or two guys to do the work and take the heat while the rest go to the bar or something, waiting for the story to go away. Instead, it could be the building block to impeachment of higher ups.

Surprised there is no press conference or security color alert today. Gutting it out to the weekend, I suppose. Gonzales has at least three more days thanks to news cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. He keeps saying "There was no investigation...
in my office." Sounds like he's choosing his words very carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. USAToday: 'CIA leak' hearing: Waxman says Plame was 'covert'


Forum Name Latest Breaking News
Topic subject 'CIA leak' hearing: Waxman says Plame was 'covert'
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2769405#2769405
2769405,


'CIA leak' hearing: Waxman says Plame was 'covert'
Posted by sabra on Fri Mar-16-07 09:51 AM


http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/03/cia_leak_hearin.html

'CIA leak' hearing: Waxman says Plame was 'covert'

<snip>

Update at 10:29 a.m. ET. She was "covert:"

The question of whether Plame was a "covert" agent when her identity was revealed in 2003 has been greatly debated. The issue is important because leaking the name of a "covert" agent violates a specific law designed to protect such operatives.

Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., just said he has been told by the CIA, in a statement authorized by CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, that "Miss Wilson's CIA employment status was covert." (Plame is married to former U.S. diplomat and Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson. She does go by the name Valerie Wilson, but is most often referred to in the media as Valerie Plame, her maiden name, because that is how she first came to be known when her name was leaked.)




http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/16/plame.congress.ap/index.html

Plame: I was outed for 'purely political reasons'

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former CIA officer Valerie Plame told a congressional committee Friday that she believes she was outed in 2003 for "purely political reasons."

Plame, whose outing triggered a federal investigation, said she always knew her identity could be discovered by foreign governments but said she was surprised to be identified by her own government.

"My name and identity were carelessly and recklessly abused by senior officials in the White House and State Department," Plame testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. "I could no longer perform the work for which I had been highly trained." (Watch Plame describe how she felt when her identity was revealed Video)

...

"It's not our job to determine criminal culpability, but it is our job to determine what went wrong and insist on accountability," Rep. Waxman said as he opened hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. CNN: Wilson: I did not recommend husband for Niger trip
Forum Name Latest Breaking News
Topic subject Wilson: I did not recommend husband for Niger trip
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2769518#2769518
2769518,


Wilson: I did not recommend husband for Niger trip
Posted by sabra on Fri Mar-16-07 11:32 AM


http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/03/wilson-i-did-not-recommend-husband-for.html

Wilson: I did not recommend husband for Niger trip

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson testified Friday that it was not her idea for her husband, former ambassador Joe Wilson, to make a trip to Niger to investigate an allegation that Iraq had sought yellowcake uranium.

"I did not suggest him. I did not recommend him. There was no nepotism involved," she said, adding, "I did not have the authority."

It was the suggestion of another CIA officer who knew that Joe Wilson had previously gone on other CIA missions "to deal with some other nuclear matters," she said.

Later, she was asked to write an e-mail summarizing the discussion that included the possibility of her husband going. A portion of that e-mail was later taken out of context to make it seem that she had suggested her husband go, she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. Cummings: If Rove recv'd this info
now that the trial is over, would Rove have any duty to report the breach. Knowdell: Yes, at the time of the ocurrence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. wow - don't think Waxman expected this...
This is a bombshell, right????

The sign "got impeachment" behind this guy...GREAT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #44
56. Agree 100%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Original message
That was great
lol i saw that too.

he had just the cutest smirk on his face too!

Got Impeachment?


hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
60. THAT was excellent.
That was a totally sweet quote. I really perked my ears up at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
41. I think that was Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, (D) Maryland just questioning the witness
No subtitles on the Committee link and it's hard to read the nametags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Original message
They did not start an investigation because,,,
that would NOT help THEIR case that Plame WAS NOT a covert agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #41
58. He just destroyed Knowdell.
That was a sight to behold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Man, this is HOT....
...on the WH not doing one damn thing to find out who was to answer...Waxman just comment on that.

I am getting goose bumps over this ~~ Bush caught in a MEGA lie over his statements that the WH was looking into this.

I am about to cry ~~ FINALLY....FINALLY....things are coming to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. Bush lied again
and this time we have him dead to rights... Can't get out of this one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #42
53. Bush: Ah conducted the investigation and found myself...
innocent of everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
133. Jr is one of those Born again-----God tells them--therefore they can not
make mistakes. simple logic for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. Sounds like it's time to subpeona the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #46
66. Waxman should be writing the subpeona right now
Get him in there before the day is over. Or is he still "out of the country"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
47. Got impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. Made me giggle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #47
61. You bet I do
Tons of it....Set the table Nancy, we are bringing home the bacon....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #47
63. This is great!
I turned from the PC just in time to see that.

I'll NEVER get any of m' housework done today with this on.

Ah fuck it! I busted my ass yesterday. Let the ol' man do his share!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
48. Watson ready to pounce on "No Tell"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #48
65. She should ask who his predecessor was
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM by Norquist Nemesis
Find out where THAT guy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
71. My goodness, she looks and sounds like she's talking to
a child who did something baaaaad.

She's angry. You can tell by looking at her OR by listening to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
49. Anyone have a vid clip of Bush saying "We're investigating who leaked"?
He's a fucking LIAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #49
69. Oh but they did investigate..don't you remember McClellem saying he asked Rove
and Rove told him it didn't happen. Investigation closed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
50. Fox in the hen house
Rove et al will not investigate themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
52. Uh oh, "Impeach Cheney First outburst!" in the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
54. I think I just heard somebody chanting again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
62. Hare Krishna?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. As much as I agree ...
they gotta chill out during this hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. To everything there is a time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Original message
Nam Meyoh Renge Kyo?
No doubt the universe is unfolding as it should!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #62
89. Heh, coulda been. Downthread is says they were saying impeach Cheney first.
OK for the downtrodden cube rats: Now Diane E. Watson, (D) California is grilling Dr. James Knodell, Director, Office of Security, The White House. She's unloading! Dereliction for not conducting a WH internal investigation into the leaks! Further investigation is in order!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
57. Impeach Cheney first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornflake_31 Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. Thought I heard that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #67
82. It's so cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #57
70. The way he is answering the questions he needs to change his name to NO-DUH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
64. I think this is even more damaging than Plame testimony
ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #64
72. absolutely
no doubt about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #64
73. Yes, they're bringing the Whitehouse right into the center of this.
Watson's nailing this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Original message
YES, far more - my head is spinning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #64
90. ABSOLUTELY!!!!!! n./t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #64
122. This is scathing. It hits to the center of the National Security question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
76. Poor guy looks like he's about to cry now
almost feel sorry for him. NOT! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #76
111. He looks like he just broke up with his wife and his dog went with her
by choice!

Screw him!

"there should be an investigation." Was there one? "No, there was no investigation."

Turn in your badge and return your last pay check. You don't deserve to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
77. He'll probably get in a fatal car accident tonight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
78. This dumb ass Knodell
is lying his as off!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
79. Your office was responsible for an investigation of the breach, is
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM by myrna minx
that correct?
Yes.

You did no investigation to find out how Karl Rive learned the identity of Ms. PLame?

No.

It seems to be dereliction of duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #79
116. The members are REALLY stunned...
This witness looks shaken, like - I really said something I shouldn't have...

This is BIG NEWS! Didn't Bush say that it was being investigated??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #116
130. He's going to be dehydrated before he leaves because of his flop sweat and dry mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
80. This guy's career is going down the drain as he keeps answing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Original message
Go get 'em Diane!
"You're the officer of SECURITY and you're telling me there was NO investigation?"


GO DIANE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
81. Watson telling Knodell, there is a dereliction of duty here
Why the Director's office has not investigated this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #81
94. Oh man -- the wheels are coming off.
I can't believe we're finally hearing this. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #81
100. Its hard to believe
these idiots would lie to the fifth power for the Bush Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
83. Ms. Watson came to kick ass and chew bubblegum, looks like she's out of gum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Original message
Someone took her Doublemint.
She's pissed.

Very.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
84. This is really getting good!
No investigation??????

Impeach Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #84
96. Oh yes
This is getting great. Van Hollen is whipping him big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #84
105. You can't make this stuff up...
We are going to see much more of this as time goes on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
85. Take no prisoners, Diane Watson!!!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #85
126. God I love her!
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:59 AM by ronnykmarshall
I'm calling her office right now to thank her.

Washington Office
125 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20515-0533
phone: 202-225-7084
fax: 202-225-2422

Los Angeles Office
4322 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 302
Los Angeles, CA 90010
phone: 323-965-1422
fax: 323-965-1113
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
86. Keep asking the question over and over
Your the director of security and there was no investigation?
GO GO GO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
87. Knodell doesn't exist on google. I found lists
of White House staff and he doesn't appear in 2005 by name or title.
"Director of White House Security"?
Is this not a staff position?
Or what?
Google has no record of "James Knodell".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #87
134. Waxman needs to know that tidbit if he already doesn't.
Email it to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
88. Oh no. Someone else is going to lose their job! (I hope)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #88
102. Rove must be smelling Rump roast burning about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #88
106. I was just wondering how soon he'd hand in his resignation
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM by eleny
Edit: I mean James Knodell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deucemagnet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
92. Wow! Diane Watson is *nailing* No-Tell Knodell!
I'm predicting that a resignation in imminent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
93. We're finally seeing the fruits of this forum.
This is wild!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
95. Just checked RedState to see what they have to say about this.
Forum Name General Discussion: Politics
Topic subject Just checked RedState to see what they have to say about this.
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3165621#3165639
3165639,

Just checked RedState to see what they have to say about this.
Posted by Old and In the Way on Fri Mar-16-07 11:50 AM

{chirp}

On the FR Front Page:

{chirp}...but they do have a live thread here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1801823/posts

750 responses so far

One of the 1st posts which should be the expected talking point of the day.

To: Mo1
Countdown until she perjures herself.
5.4.3.2.1....
3 posted on 03/16/2007 6:03:01 AM PDT by mnehrling (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #95
115. WH defense is that they did not know Plame was covert. They are using this hearing to
Forum Name General Discussion
Topic subject The Whitehouse defense is that they did not know Plame was covert. They are using this hearing to
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x426445#426445
426445,

The Whitehouse defense is that they did not know Plame was covert. They are using this hearing to
Posted by Sapere aude on Fri Mar-16-07 11:39 AM

make that point. I hope we prove otherwise. It blows my mind that the most repukes will protect party over country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #115
124. So what RW "CIA Leak" talking points have been blown out of the water?
Forum Name General Discussion
Topic subject So what RW "CIA Leak" talking points have been blown out of the water?
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x426448#426448
426448, So what RW "CIA Leak" talking points have been blown out of the water?
Posted by sabra on Fri Mar-16-07 11:40 AM

- The day Novak's article was published Plame was a covert agent
- Plame conducted foreign undercover mission in the past 5 years
- Plame didn't in anyway send Joe Wilson to Niger
- A memo was sent to the three Senate Republicans refuting their amendment regarding Joe Wilson's trip. The memo was ignored.
- Joe Wilson comes from a Republican family

What else?

edit: the above points shatter the talking points :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
97. "An investigation should be done"
"But it was not done"

"Correct"

OH SNAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #97
107. Uh-oh. Pack your bags Mr. Knodell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #97
108. That was a great exchange by Van Hollen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
98. need a new thread......Smoking Gun just killed the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
99. this testimony is more revealing and damaging than Plames
Most of what Valery Plame said was already pretty much known and she verified it.

This is new and revealing information here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
104. Holy sh*t this is getting good!
Take these f**kers down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
109. THREAD #9 HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
110. Unraveling
like a ball of yarn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
112. Van Hollen: Why aren't you investigating today? n/t
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:55 AM by myrna minx
Knodell: I will take a look at this and take it back to the office. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Original message
Looks like he's going to being one this afternoon!
"I'll review with Senior Management and get back to you." :rofl:

The guy looks terrified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
125. Why do I have visions of the movie Brazil about now.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
113. I just loved it when Knodell gave the classic Repub "I'm screwed" look!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
114. Chris Van Hollen D-MD8) grilling Knodell
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 11:55 AM by 48percenter
Investigation should be done, but was NOT done. Leaker continues to be in the White House. Knodell: Yes. <squirming>

Why aren't you undertaking an investigation TODAY?? Knodell, still squirming. Will review with Senior Management when I get back to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #114
118. Thats my congressman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
117. SHAZAAAM
why didn't the WH undertake an investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #117
123. because they were told not to
they need to keep at him until they get it out of him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
119. Boy, is this good...
...WHY no WH investigation NOW????? And No-Tell is trying to deflect ~~ cuz there was a criminal investigation.

Next qustion to No-Tell: Is that rule written down somewhere?

WHAM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
120. Wow, even the slimy republican is outraged there was no
investigation. It is obvious the repubs DID NOT KNOW there had been NO investigation, EVER, by the WH.

Wow......I don't think anyone at this hearing expected to hear there had been NO investigation, this is very BIG, imo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
121. It can be awkward?
What a BS statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
127. MODS PLEASE LOCK - NEW THREAD HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
128. Folks, there IS NO "White House Office of Security".
I searched the official White House website and this 'office' does not exist.
Does c-span have the nomenclature wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #128
131. Neither is there a "James Knodell" on WH web search.
Wha????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #128
137. Try looking for this
Dr. James Knodell, Director, Office of Security, The White House

That's the way Knodell is listed as a witness on the Committee website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
129. Our guys are really
prepared, ain't they. Poke 'em with a stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #129
132. "Bush was outraged", saying "heads would roll" over the leak, but it
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 12:00 PM by myrna minx
turns out that he didn't do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #132
135. jr and Hannity go hand in hand----Feining outrage!! sorrow, ect ect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Graybeard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
136. Knodell looks like an incompetent fool.
...this guy has to be another crony, put into an important position but with no intention of him doing his job. BushCo's utter contempt for the American people and our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #136
138. Watson really hammered him
Boy, it must really suck to be him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
139. Locking - thread 9 link below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC