Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

16 Words: New Court Filing Suggests Manufactured Terror Threat in Bush's 2002 State of the Union

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:12 PM
Original message
16 Words: New Court Filing Suggests Manufactured Terror Threat in Bush's 2002 State of the Union
16 Words: New Court Filing Suggests Manufactured Terror Threat in Bush's 2002 State of the Union


A new court filing by the lawyers for Lakhdar Boumediene and five other Guantanamo detainees suggests that the Bush administration ordered the Bosnian government to arrest and hold the men after an exhaustive Bosnian investigation had found them innocent of any terrorism related activity and had ordered their release, in order to use them as props in Bush's January 2002 State of the Union speech.

The filing--"Lakhdar Boumediene, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al., Respondents, Petitioners' Public Traverse to the Government's Return to the Petition for Habeas Corpus"--lays out the case that the Bush administration threatened at the highest levels to withdraw diplomatic and military aid to the Balkan nation if Bosnia released the men, which its own three-month investigation had found innocent of any terrorism charges in the days leading up to Bush's January 2002 State of the Union.

Faced with the threats of the withdrawal of aid and that if it released the men, the White House would order NATO troops to detain them, Bosnia transferred the men under duress to the custody of the US government in January 2002, and the US transferred them to Guantanamo. Ten days later, in his 2002 State of the Union address, Bush used sixteen words to warn Americans that, in "cooperation" with the Bosnian government, it had captured terrorists who had planned to bomb the US embassy in Sarajevo: "Our soldiers, working with the Bosnian government, seized terrorists who were plotting to bomb our embassy," Bush told the nation.

But, six years later, the detainees' new petition says, after the US Supreme Court has sided with the detainees and ordered the US to give the detainees habeas corpus rights, the Bush administration has failed to repeat the embassy plot charges that Bush used in his State of the Union address, or to produce credible evidence of why the men should be held as enemy combatants.

more...

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/10/10385_16_words_detain.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I shudder to think of just how many innocent souls have had their lives destroyed...
by these heartless fucking jackals.

I hope every one of the bastards die a long, painful death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm in total agreement. They've ruined so many lives illegally,
and so far are getting away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for posting this, thank you Mother Jones for writing it. k+r, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not surprising - sickening, but not surprising.
I was in Bosnia this summer. I doubt they are getting the kind of aid that is needed anyway - or at least it's not making its way to where it is truly needed.

http://s528.photobucket.com/albums/dd323/irish_lambchop/Bosnia%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. They did it legally?
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 05:35 PM by 90-percent
Maybe not so much. They also did plenty of illegal stuff.

All a moot point because they are all ABOVE THE LAW.

It's like a license to kill, only bigger and better.

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. More LIES.
And more superb journalism by Mother Jones.

Neither surprises me.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC