Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Times UK: "Shallow, fake... 'QUEEN OF MISINFORMATION' Sarah Palin is beyond parody"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 06:58 PM
Original message
Times UK: "Shallow, fake... 'QUEEN OF MISINFORMATION' Sarah Palin is beyond parody"
The kid-glove treatment of the Republican vice-presidential candidate is an insult to women.

There is a time when it is necessary to take the gloves off and that time is right now, said Sarah Palin in Colorado. Interesting that she did not want the gloves off before her vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden. Oh, gloves on then. Headgear, too. Maybe some of those big shoulder pads that quarter-backs wear; and throw cushions for a softer landing. In fact, Palin and her minders could not have demanded a safer arena for debate when the opposition was within striking distance. Biden appeared with his hands tied, his intellect muted, his manner subdued, lest he should seem smarter, better informed or more competent than his opponent, a move which was inexplicably deemed undesirable. This shows how far we have come. Intelligence is now viewed as a threat. Isn't that how Pol Pot operated?

Meanwhile, the Republican lobby put pressure on the debate moderator not to go heavy on foreign policy, perhaps fearing that Palin would repeat her view that experience in this area was linked to proximity to a coastline, and expectations were lowered so that just avoiding intellectual humiliation would be seen as victory. And it worked. She got the name of the Nato commander in Afghanistan wrong and Biden smiled politely. She pronounced nuclear the same way that Homer Simpson does and he had to find it charming. She failed to answer direct questions, while advancing a carefully moulded image as a straight-talking maverick, and it went unquestioned. Now, from a safe distance, Palin wants the gloves off. Of course she does, with no chance of instant scrutiny.

Palin is the queen of misinformation, delivered with faux folksiness as authentic as a three- dollar bill. She is not the pitbull in lipstick of popular myth; she is Deputy Dawg with a forked tongue, engaged in a war against intelligence. Those falling for this act are her collateral damage. Barack Obama did not pal around with terrorists. He did not vote to increase the tax burden on families making $42,000 a year, or vote 94 times to increase taxes. Palin's statements on these subjects are not a reality bulletin from Main Street, Wasilla. Palin's statements are lies. Madeline Albright did not speak of a place in Hell reserved for women who do not support other women. Palin misquoted her. Albright said help, not support. And there is no such place as Hell.

Even so, for those American women who worry that they risk damnation if they don't vote the Republican ticket, it should be explained that eternity with a pitchfork impaled in your rear is still preferable to a vote for a politician who aided her political career by using her Down's syndrome child to cover her daughter's pregnancy bump. And it is at this point that we need to talk to the Democrat women considering joining Palin's ranks and ask: what the hell is wrong with you? People were imprisoned and trampled to death by horses for this? They marched, they demonstrated, and for what? A vote cast on the basis of a Y chromosome?

You go, girl. Go? Go where? Go to college? Go back to that Republican cramming camp to be told what newspapers to say you read and be fed another set of fake statistics where real knowledge and opinions should be? It is easy to parody Sarah Palin, wrote one commentator last week. No, it isn't. It is near impossible because so much of what she says reads like a satirical script anyway. Tina Fey, the finest Palin imitator, was reduced on Saturday Night Live to using Palin's exact words in response to a question about the bailout package last week, because they were beyond imitation.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/martin_samuel/article4894253.ece



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I feel like they're holding back and should come out and tell us how they really feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Intelligence is now viewed as a threat. Isn't that how Pol Pot operated?"
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deputy Dawg with a forked tongue?
:rofl: Wish you Brits could vote in this election!! :toast: :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. that was my favorite line too!


can't do the forked tongue thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r

excellent right on article!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Great read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. HEY!!! What did Deputy Dawg ever do to you Times UK?
that you felt the need to insult the Dawg by comparing him to Palin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great little quote in RH corner above story:
"Sarah Palin revealed the intellect and political experience of a whelk." Rod Liddle



Those Brits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. george bush with lipstick, Another Rove media creation. Who will fall for this again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. ZOMFG, k&r baby!
"eternity with a pitchfork impaled in your rear is still preferable to a vote for a politician who aided her political career by using her Down's syndrome child to cover her daughter's pregnancy bump"

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Like that, eh?
Me too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Nobody does snark like the Brits!
It's a lost art in this country, we could use a few thousand Steve Bells...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm sure American papers will pick up this editorial...no, really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sad, isn't it, that a paper totally outside the country has to be the one to publish a piece like
this?

We should have read the equivalent of this article here already, many, many times in our "watchdog" press.

What a relief it was to see the author noted, and grieved over what had been done to handicap Joe Biden. Very wonderfully, if sadly detailed description of his constricted situation.

Would LOVE to see this article reprinted all over the place.

Glad to have seen it here, at D.U. Thank you, Bluebear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. K+R - great read and spot on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kick...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kick again - because I can't kick the woman herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. A cyber kick :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. "faux folksiness as authentic as a three-dollar bill" My impression too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. 'QUEEN OF MISINFORMATION' - Absolutely perfect description...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. The biggest irony is that the Times is a Murdoch paper
I suspect a major reorganization of Fox News starting next November...if Obama wins in a landslide it might be the pinks lip for O'Reilly, Hannity et al. Murdoch does not like to be associated with losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. The editors are fighting him
Prior to Murdoch buying it, the Times had a reputation for scrupulous accuracy and through (sometimes drearily through) objectivity. The editors seem to be fighting to maintain that reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Brits don't mince words do they.
Wonder what the freepers would think if they could read this article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. far too many big words :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kickeded, recommended, and forwarded to my distribution list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Perfect!
Kick! Hey, Brits :hi: Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. Heh..this post makes my day.
I loves me the Brits.

Thanks for the post!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. My pleasure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedLetterRev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Me mater thanks you, me pater thanks you
and I K&R :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC