Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Camp Trots Out First Keating Defense -- Claims Investigation Was A Political Hit Job

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:16 PM
Original message
McCain Camp Trots Out First Keating Defense -- Claims Investigation Was A Political Hit Job
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 12:17 PM by bigtree
from AmericaBlog: http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/mccain-now-saying-keating-five-scandal.html


Holy crap.

I'm listening to the McCain campaign conference call about John McCain's involvement in the Keating Five scandal. McCain's lawyer just said that the Keating Five investigation was "political" as it concerned John McCain. He shouldn't even have been admonished by the Senate, his lawyer says. (http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/lawyer_defending_mccain_on_kea.php)


Then McCain's lawyer dropped the real bomb.

The Keating Five Investigation was "a political smear job on John McCain." WTF? He called Howell Heflin, who led the hearings, a "stooge" of the Democratic machine out to get poor, innocent John McCain.

This opens up the entire question of McCain's supposed contrition. If McCain thinks he did nothing wrong, and that it was wrong for the Senate to scold him for his actions during the Keating Five Scandal, then he isn't contrite at all, he isn't sorry at all. He's learned nothing. You can't turn a new leaf when you don't think you did anything wrong. This is one hell of an admission. Get more on the Keating Five Scandal at the new Obama campaign Web site, KeatingEconomics.com And here is the Obama campaign's new documentary about McCain's involvement in this ethics scandal


(if the video isn't loading well, it may be because of the absurd amount of traffic trying to watch it - use this link instead if you're having a problem): http://www.barackobama.com/images/keating/keatingeconomics.mov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not able to view the video--will wait till later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it was a political hit job,
then why did McInsane apologize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. A political hit job with all those Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Just a cover so you wouldn't know it was a hit job on McCain
Actually they even included the equally high profile Glenn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Howell Heflin may have been a lot of things, but...
nobody's EVER called him a 'stooge'.
He was a very able politician and a highly respected member of the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tom Delay said the same thing about his scandals
which resulted in his being rebuked by the house ethics committee, just like McCain was rubuked by the Senate ethics committee.

What's the difference between John McCain and Tom Delay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. That investigation was actually carried out by a special prosecutor.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 12:38 PM by RDANGELO
All of the Democrats were more severely fingered than McCain, who I believe was the only Republican. This was during the Reagan administration. I remember watching the hearings on CSpan. The special prosecutor was Bob Benett, The brother of Bill Benett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bennett defended McCain, albeit with a contradictory argument
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 12:49 PM by bigtree
Here's Standard Newswire's attempt to use Bennett's statements to defend McCain that he included in his book, 'Pure Politics': (I'm not linking them)


"At the completion of my investigation, I filed my report with the committee. I recommended that no further action be taken against Senators McCain and Glenn principally because once they learned that there was a criminal referral, they stopped aggressively doing Keating's bidding with the regulators."


All Bennett is saying here is that once McCain knew his ass was going to be prosecuted he tried to back off. But the fact remains that McCain did try and influence regulators on behalf of Keating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Was McCain's wife was in business with Keating?
I seem to recall she and her money were somehow involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. There is a connection
"In addition, McCain's wife Cindy McCain and her father Jim Hensley had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6735630
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. yep. It's all over the net
here's one account: http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/mccain/articles/0301mccainbio-chapter7.html


. . . the details are In spinning his side of the Keating story, McCain adopted the blanket defense that Keating was a constituent and that he had every right to ask his senators for help. In attending the meetings, McCain said, he simply wanted to make sure that Keating was treated like any other constituent.

Keating was far more than a constituent to McCain, however.

On Oct. 8, 1989, The Republic revealed that McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators.

...When the story broke, McCain did nothing to help himself. When reporters first called him, he was furious. Caught out in the open, the former fighter pilot let go with a barrage of cover fire. Sen. Hothead came out in all his glory.

''You're a liar,''' McCain snapped Sept. 29 when a Republic reporter asked him about business ties between his wife and Keating.

''That's the spouse's involvement, you idiot,'' McCain said later in the same conversation. ''You do understand English, don't you?''

He also belittled the reporters when they asked about his wife's ties to Keating.

''It's up to you to find that out, kids.''

And then he played the POW card.

''Even the Vietnamese didn't question my ethics,'' McCain said.

The paper ran the story a few days later. At a news conference, McCain was a changed man. He stood calmly for 90 minutes and answered every question.

On the shopping center, his defense was simple. The deal did not involve him. The shares in the shopping center had been purchased by a partnership set up between McCain's wife and her father.


more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/mccain/articles/0301mccainbio-chapter7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I thought Cindy McCain was dirty in Keating Five, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Then let's go back and examine the entire scandal in detail
if McCain wants to clear himself. In fact, let's convene new Senate hearings where John McCain can testify and explain his involvement. If McCain now retracts his apology and claims it was all a hit job, let's re-open the investigation and give him a new opportunity to prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC