Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "60 min" story about the abortive attempt to catch bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:20 AM
Original message
The "60 min" story about the abortive attempt to catch bin Laden
and this was in 2001. And they were still trying to blame Clinton for that?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4167495
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Question:
Who was torpedoing Delta's operational plans from afar? And why?

Something is very stinky about that and I got the feeling that the ex-major was holding some very pithy comments and speculations back when he was speaking of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. See my comments in Post #6
Nothing you don't know.

I suspect this guy was operating completely in the blind, just following orders with no "need to know" or even expecting to have any explanation of the why. I doubt he has even the faintest clue about who was running him or what they wanted. Just a tool, and as such a fool. He thought about the moral question (a novel idea, and generally discouraged among the professional assassination gangs) and figured that offing bin Laden was not only following orders but righteous. When the orders changed he learned something, but probably not that his missions had never been righteous and that his whole life had been one of ignorant servitude to powers who regard his sense of right and wrong as laughable weaknesses and an easy lever for turning him into an utterly immoral pawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah
When the orders changed he learned something, but probably not that his missions had never been righteous and that his whole life had been one of ignorant servitude to powers who regard his sense of right and wrong as laughable weaknesses and an easy lever for turning him into an utterly immoral pawn.

That's poetry. But it raises the question: Is the nation-state dead?

Follow me here. We're all pawns when you get down to brass tacks. It’s a big club and you ain't in it. You and I are not in The Big Club.

Bin Laden. 9/11. The WTC. The next president. Pffftt. The owners of this country could care less about that shit.

We're looking at maps. These guys are tracking the dollars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanbanks44 Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. For those who haven't seen the package
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Next time a Freeper lies about Clinton's refusal to take OBL, remind them of McCain's
position in 1998-

Question: You not only have had combat experience in Vietnam, but you were also a prisoner of war. When you look at terrorism right now, with people like Osama bin Laden, do you have any reservations about watching strikes like that?

Answer: You could say, Look, is this guy, Laden, really the bad guy that's depicted? Most of us have never heard of him before. And where there is a parallel with Vietnam is: What's plan B? What do we do next? We sent our troops into Vietnam to protect the bases. Lyndon Johnson said, Only to protect the bases. Next thing you know.... Well, we've declared to the terrorists that we're going to strike them wherever they live. That's fine. But what's next? That's where there might be some comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Interesting. Wonder whether he still feels like that today (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. There were stories back then on Al Jazeera and other non American
media that tribal fighters who were fighting with our guys told them that they had bin Laden cornered, but the order came not to go in a get him. Those stories were never reported in our M$M, whore media and I remember people trying to talk about it being sneered at. Too bad 60 Minutes didn't have the balls to do an investigative report back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. If getting bin Laden and neutralizing Al Qaeda had been the goal there were two were easy options.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 02:24 AM by ConsAreLiars
Accept the offer of the Taliban to send him to a third party tribunal. or just do some act of unauthorized (by the Taliban) but honorable (in the eyes of the Taliban and every Muslim and sane person in the world) vengeance against them. Both would have raised the esteem of the US in the eyes of the Afghan people and the world generally.

But that was never the goal. The Delta Force operative is just a pissed-off grunt in this story. He doesn't have any idea that the "Great Game" players had decided that invasions and occupations for geopolitical points on the game board were easier to sell when the Boogieman was still running around and maybe hiding under every coward's bed.

(edit tiny typos)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC