Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Congressman: Representatives Were Threatened With Martial Law In America Over Bailout Bil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Night_Nurse Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:29 PM
Original message
Democratic Congressman: Representatives Were Threatened With Martial Law In America Over Bailout Bil
A Democratic Congressman has warned that a panic atmosphere is being intentionally created in order to get the financial bailout billed passed, further stating that several members of Congress were told before Monday’s vote that martial law will be instigated in America if the legislation fails.

Congressman Brad Sherman of California’s 27th congressional district told the House in a speech yesterday evening that he personally knew of several Congressional representatives who have said they were threatened with the prospect of all out martial law should they vote in opposition to the $700 billion bailout.

Sherman essentially intimated that powerful forces who want the bill passed have attempted to blackmail elected representatives.

"The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. That atmosphere is not justified." Sherman stated.


http://www.infowars.com/?p=5061

Is anyone else as frightened as I am about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who, specifically, told which members of the House that there would be martial law?
I don't know why he would say that on the floor of the House of Representatives, but I'd hope he could back it up with actual evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Here's a link to the video at DU, btw.
Here.

  BTW, I'm assuming administration officials. Can't imagine anyone else, in any context, who would wind up being quoted by a sitting House member like that.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO . FUCKING . VIRAL . NOW (if this is true)!!!!
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 04:36 PM by Patmccccc
This must be everywhere right away!!! I'm tellin ya, they will pull out ALL the stops now. Too much to lose. Something even bigger could be right around the corner. they are chomping at the bit to find a reason to go with Martial Law!!! Maybe to try and stop the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Based on some random unverifiable statement on the House floor?
Tell me you're kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Why don't you do the 'if this is true' part FIRST
This doesn't mean what you think it does; a technical congressional term has been taken way out of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. He was not speaking about the
congressional rule. THe video is pretty clear what he was speaking about. It would not surprise me if it were true but I am reserving judgement until there is a second person who says he was told the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. This video is now being circulated all over myspace! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. ARGH! would people please do a little research first?
There is such a thing as 'congressional martial law' which refers to the house leadership using its authority to push bills through without the normal cycle of committee hearings, floor debates etc. It's inside baseball to you, but to members of Congress and their staff it's just a technical term. It does NOT mean there were going to be soldiers in the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He did say "martial law in America"...watch the video.
It's such a completely bizarre statement, though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaG9d_4zij8

He should either retract the statement from the record or offer some evidence to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You're right - in which case, my blame transfers to him.
(for misleading people with such a random comment). Nothing personal to you, but I'm just going to stay out of these threads because I have a feeling there's no point in arguing with the lunatic fringe people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Out of curiosity, Anigbrowl, can you explain how you know he's misleading people?
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I don't know so, but I believe so
It's an inflammatory remark (for obvious reasons) and to offer it up sans context strikes me as pure grandstanding. If he backs it up I might change my mind, but right now I strongly suspect he took either a reference to congressional practice (of ramming through bills without going through the normal committee process) or else a remark along the lines of 'Look brad, what if the economy collapses? We could end up with riots and martial law like in Country X when the economy collapsed' and parlayed that into a threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. His allegation is about private conversations between members of Congress. What evidence do you
suppose he could produce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Big deal. The lobbyists threats of cutting off their income was more ominous to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. like the hiway men of old: stand and deliver
your money or your life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
57_TomCat Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Scare tactics work...
The party was betrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. except that they didn't. He's referring to tactics used before the first vote
The one where the bailout plan was defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. his point wasn't that there was a real threat, but that hyperbole was being used to push the bill
He didn't really think people were serious that the "sky would fall" either. His point was that unfounded assertions were being made by some to create pressure for the bill to pass. Its hardly the first or last time that hyperbole will be used by the proponents or opponents of a piece of legislation. He obviously didn't regard it as a threat since he voted against the bill.

If it was a serious threat, he would be duty-bound to disclose who made it. The reason he hasn't done so is that he doesn't want to embarass those who engaged in over the top rhetoric to push the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R. Brad Sherman is one of the few honest men and women in that sewer called Congress.
They sure got us good this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Busholini could have declared a National Emergency.
He could have forced the Bailout via Executive Decree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. And it is in the Congressional record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Someone probably said:
"A complete breakdown of the economy could lead to dire consequences, perhaps even involving martial law being declared at some point." Which is perfectly true. I don't see how explaining the implications amounts to blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Nice little place you got there. A shame if it burned down.
Seems as though martial law was mentioned in a similar vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. If I were a Dem Congresscritter who had been threatened by the Bushies
I would find colleagues who had also been threatened and GO PUBLIC.

Sherman's mistake was to make that statement without support from colleagues. Now the Republicanites will convince the independents that he's just a nutcase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC