Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Nancy Pelosi's golden-parachute talk real or a fraud?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:08 PM
Original message
Is Nancy Pelosi's golden-parachute talk real or a fraud?
It was my understanding that the way they usually approach this is to put a ceiling on the amount that could be used as a tax deduction. In other words, they could pay as much as they want, but only so much could be deducted as a business expense come tax time.

Does anybody know if they used a different approach this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. fraud
When you're talking about income in the billions and billions of dollars, does it really matter if ten million in salary or bonus isn't deductible as a business expense?

What do you think? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. My question is to whether or not they found a way around that approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unless It Were Phrased in Terms of Taxes
capping compensation would be a very unusual kind of regulation and subject to legal dispute or political fallout.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So, despite what the Speaker just said, this bill will subsidize
CEO salaries to the hundreds of millions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, It Will Discourage Golden Parachutes
and tax companies that provide them rather than prohibit them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. if that's all it is then it would be a mere political stunt to put the bill through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And an ugly one at that.
I think she actually borrowed language from the fallout of the Enron scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. there is no enforceable oversight in the bill
there is toothless language about oversight, but bottom line is everything is discretionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. There are two different provisions
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 01:46 PM by HamdenRice
One provision outright bans "golden parachutes" for any executive as long as the Treasury has debt or equity of the financial firm.

The other makes compensation above $500,000 non-deductible. In the past, non-deductability of executive compensation not had much of an impact. There already is a provision that makes compensation over $1 million non deductible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC