Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At least 14 members will change their vote on the bailout --KEEP CALLING!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:54 AM
Original message
At least 14 members will change their vote on the bailout --KEEP CALLING!
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/at-least-14-members-will-change-their-votes-on-bailout-2008-10-03.html

Proponents of the massive financial rescue plan are expressing optimism that the House will pass it on Friday.

At least 14 members who voted no on Monday have indicated that they will approve of the package that will be voted on on the House floor early Friday afternoon, according to interviews and a review of media reports.

Members who have publicly suggested that they will approve of the new compromise include Democratic Reps. Shelley Berkley (Nev.), Emanuel Cleaver (Mo.), John Lewis (Ga.) and Hilda Solis (Calif.) and Republican Reps. Gresham Barrett (S.C.), Howard Coble (N.C.), Jim Gerlach (Pa.), Tim Murphy (Pa.), Jim Ramstad (Minn.), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.), John Shadegg (Ariz.), Lee Terry (Neb.), Patrick Tiberi (Ohio) and Zach Wamp (Tenn.).

All 14 voted no on Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rolleitreks Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just got off the phone with my Rep's office (Shuler -NC) he's keeping his NO vote!
woot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Great! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh no. Gerlach is my rep. Aw shit. Time to call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. No--this needs to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh, good grief! -- Sorry, pal---IGNORE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. ignore Krugman also
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 11:13 AM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. You need a more substantive argument than Krugman --
ttp://www.credoaction.com/sirota/

Note to bailout/Obama apologists: You are going to have to get a different substantive argument other than saying "well, Paul Krugman supports it so I guess it's good." You would do well to actually read what Krugman has said, which is that: "To this day have never been able to explain clearly why buying up bad mortgage assets at market prices will solve the credit crunch...The Wise Men, as far as I can tell, have never had a clear idea of what they're doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. did you hear that STATES cannot get loans now?????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:31 AM
Original message
go back and READ post# 17. STOP THE CRAZY-OCRACY! VOTE NO ON BAILOUT n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Ignore me too then !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Do your homework. ---IGNORE n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I have- now go take your own advice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. That's not fair.
Comeon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Cowardly craven bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's working. I called. It might be too late for me. But we need this bill.
Thanks for the update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Do you want the United States to assume trash investment from
Foreign companies and corporations? Is that what you REALLY think? We, the People of the United States of America need to capitulate to Extortion?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqIFoBXGizc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Unbelievable, isn't it? We live in a "crazy-ocracy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. I think many people are in denial..
about the root cause of this crisis, the true size of the derivatives market, and the action needed to help.

They also have forgotten history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. I will. I will. I want to see at least 20 repubs change their votes to yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ah Xoc Kin Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. what people need
is an online fax service with some letters they can use
or make themselves
for times like this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Use the Windows fax facility -- if you run Windows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. This needs to pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. THIS SHOULD NOT PASS!
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/oct/02/ex-treasury-secretary-oneill-says-bailout-plan/

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said the $700 billion bank-rescue proposal under negotiation in Washington is "crazy," with potentially "awful" consequences for the world's largest economy.

"Doesn't this seem like lunacy to you?" said O'Neill, who was President George W. Bush's first Treasury chief, from 2001 to 2002, in a telephone interview Wednesday. "The consequences of it are unbelievably bad in terms of public intrusion into the private sector."

O'Neill's objections mirror those of Republicans in the House of Representatives who rejected the plan in a Sept. 29 vote. The former Treasury chief said he lobbied for an alternative solution that would offer guarantees for troubled assets, stopping short of purchasing the debt.

"Is anybody thinking there?" asked O'Neill, who also served as deputy budget director in the Ford administration. "It's too late, it's not going to make any difference and it's aggravating as hell when there's a better idea and you can't even get it in play," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. the bailout proponents .."have never been able to explain clearly why buying up bad mortgage assets
at market prices will solve the credit crunch...The Wise Men, as far as I can tell, have never had a clear idea of what they're doing."
http://www.credoaction.com/sirota/

Note to bailout/Obama apologists: You are going to have to get a different substantive argument other than saying "well, Paul Krugman supports it so I guess it's good." You would do well to actually read what Krugman has said, which is that: "To this day have never been able to explain clearly why buying up bad mortgage assets at market prices will solve the credit crunch...The Wise Men, as far as I can tell, have never had a clear idea of what they're doing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. The hold your nose caucus
Aha. Via Andrew Leonard, Joe Sitglitz seems to have the same view on the bailout that I have: lousy plan, better to pass it tomorrow than not:

Well, I think it remains a very bad bill … But that having been said, it is better than doing nothing, and hopefully after the election, we can repair the very many mistakes in it.

Yuk, phooey, pass the thing, then fix it.

And Roubini: He says,

-

Radically redesign the Treasury TARP rescue plan – possibly after its necessary approval today - to make it effective, efficient and fair.

Basically, Paulson has placed us all in a miserable predicament, with a lousy plan that has to be passed in some form to prevent total panic. Jan. 20 won’t come a moment too soon, and may well come about 4 1/2 months too late.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/the-hold-your-nose-caucus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. You need a more substantive argument -- see post #17--VOTE NO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. It's unlikely too..
But congress can pretend that they did something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. Ex-Treasury secretary O'Neill says bailout plan 'crazy', 'lunacy'-- stop the crazy-ocracy -- VOTE NO
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/oct/02/ex-treasury-secretary-oneill-says-bailout-plan/

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said the $700 billion bank-rescue proposal under negotiation in Washington is "crazy," with potentially "awful" consequences for the world's largest economy.

"Doesn't this seem like lunacy to you?" said O'Neill, who was President George W. Bush's first Treasury chief, from 2001 to 2002, in a telephone interview Wednesday. "The consequences of it are unbelievably bad in terms of public intrusion into the private sector."

O'Neill's objections mirror those of Republicans in the House of Representatives who rejected the plan in a Sept. 29 vote. The former Treasury chief said he lobbied for an alternative solution that would offer guarantees for troubled assets, stopping short of purchasing the debt.

"Is anybody thinking there?" asked O'Neill, who also served as deputy budget director in the Ford administration. "It's too late, it's not going to make any difference and it's aggravating as hell when there's a better idea and you can't even get it in play," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Listen to Buffet. You have no substantive argument. Vote yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Buffett got preferred shares and 10% dividend -- We get trash-- VOTE NO ON THE BAILOUT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. It's insane. Like dealing with the Titanic by ....
... giving the owners, captain, and crew all your money and jewelry and sending them off in the only lifeboats while everyone else goes down with the ship.

Totally insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. EXACTLY! VOTE NO ON THE BAILOUT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. No one has explained how the bailout bill will help the credit crunch. NO ONE. VOTE NO! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
32. Keep Calling! And email this information to your contacts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
35. Easiest and stupidest stick-up of all time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
36. REPEAT:NO ONE has explained why buying up bad mortgage assets at market prices will solve the crunch
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC