Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think the next President should curb the power of the Executive Branch?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:24 AM
Original message
Do you think the next President should curb the power of the Executive Branch?
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 08:25 AM by ck4829
Even though I believe that 2008 will be pretty much a walk for the Democrats, I'd like the President to cut his own powers, especially those that were gained during the Bush Administration. Our separation of powers have been damaged these past several years, it's time to reverse it IMHO.

Agree or disagree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. agree
... but don't count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed..
Just as there should be separation of State and Church

there should be separation of powers between Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches.

If anyone noticed in the Constitution the Legislative branch is listed first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crud76 Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Agreed That It Should Be Done...
...but it needs to be done by the current Congress. After what we've been through the past six years we can't afford to let it go and trust it to someone else. One brush with a dictatorship is enough for a lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans will demand it if a Democrat becomes President
People sure have short memories. Don't you recall how hard they worked to undermine the Presidency during the Clinton years? They will pick right back up where they left off until another Republican is "elected" again and then it will be more power for Administration and less for Congress (the people) once again...It is hard wired into them.. They must dominate....not just lead but dominate...the whole world..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. If Hillary gets it.............
You can forget about it. I do not trust the war mongering Hillary and the DLC. End the Bush-Clinton-Bush era!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hillary Clinton is a War-Monger?
That seems like an overly harsh characterization.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why? The whole History of the US
has been about expanding the power of government. Most people involved with Federal government are authoritarian by nature and see no benefits to reducing their power and control.

But to answer your question yes. I would like to see the next executive utterly do away with Presidential signing statements, the War powers resolution, control over National Guard and other egregious dictatorial powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can he/she?
I think it would be determined that there are certain powers the executive cannot cede to the Congress/Judiciary (and vice versa). He/she might not take the ambitious stances that GWB has, but I don't think he could actually reduce the scope of his powers in any meaningful, statutory way.

And frankly, that would probably the last thing on the nexts Presidents mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC