Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most people in America are NOT "home-owners"..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:36 PM
Original message
Most people in America are NOT "home-owners"..
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 05:37 PM by SoCalDem
That one little change in terminology needs to be made, and held to.

Until you have made the last payment you are NOT a "home-owner"..

You are leasing-with-an-option-to-buy from your lender, until you make that last payment..

The only thing you "OWN" about your home, is the stuff IN it (unless you financed that too), and anything you could make from selling it for over what you still owe on it, and the fees associated with selling it..

This whole Mom & Apple Pie notion of "home-ownership" is a real problem for us, and it's finally being brought to the fore.. Let's hope we actually deal with it..once and for all..

America has always had a shortage of "decent" places for renters to live, so naturally "buying" has been the holy grail..

All people want a place where they can "do what they want to" , but the facts are that most people cannot "afford" to have that anymore.. Wages have not kept up with the desire to "buy a house", so tricky financing was the solution.

There's a reason it's called "The American Dream".... Most of the time , dreams do not come true, and most dreams are done in our sleep, when we are not actively THINKING...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful!!!
Thank you for stating the obvious. What a first-rate post!

The language we all just take for granted is so often misleading, and it takes someone like you to point out the sloppiness of the word usage.

Like "pro-life," which implies that we who support the idea of choice are somehow "anti-life." In fact, we're all "pro-life," excluding our suicidal brothers and sisters, but those rightwingnuts stole the language from us.

I once carried a sign to an anti-choice rally and stood next to a woman who was holding up a sign that said "Protect the pre-born."

My sign said, "Help the pre-dead," and an arrow pointed to me.

Thank you for a singularly clarifying post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. You do not own it outright, but...
...you do own an interest in it, therefore, you are an owner. The bank is not going to do the necessary repairs over the years, so they have only a vested interest.

I own three homes and 158 apartment units, outright. If I sell one and carry the note, I am termed the lienholder, and not the owner. I cannot deduct the interest, the OWNER does that. So, technically, you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Uben has it right
In my case my equity position in my home is about 3-4 times what I owe on my mortgage. I have enough in retirement savings that I could pay off the mortgage any time (with tax penalties, of course, which is one of several reasons I am not doing that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. why not pay it off?
is the money you have available to you liquid or is it in some ACCOUNT that would penalize you on the tax???

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm not old enough for a penalty-free distribution from an IRA or 401k
But even if I was, it still would not make sense to pay off a 4.75% fixed-rate mortgage with just under 10 years remaining from its 15-year term. Over that time period, any broad stock index mutual fund is very likely to do better than 4.75%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. understood...
did not know there was an age issue. the problem is that lots of people hang on to mortgages where the rates are not all that favorable because they think the tax deduction is an advantage...and in many cases it is not...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. potato-potahto
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 05:49 PM by SoCalDem
try missing a few payments (not you, since you are obviouslya real-estate magnate), and see how long you "own" that house..and yes you are responsible to repair & do upkeep, and deduct the interest you pay, BUT "technically" you still do not "own" it, until you actually "own it":hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Try not paying your taxes on that home.....
....and see if they come after you or the bank. Then you will know who the real owner is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There is that too...but fortunately for most of us, taxes are still somewhat affordable
and you only have to pay them twice a year :)

BTW..ours went up a BUNCH..as our "value" dropped about 40%..:grr:.. and we have 7 boarded up houses on our street alone:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I know, that sucks!
I spend hours every year at the tax office arguing things such as that. I load them down with pictures, appraisals, tax statements, comps,....the works. They HATE to see me coming. They, the taxing entity, usually wind up lowering my taxes to some extent just to pacify me, and for them not to have to comb over all the information I take in. This strategy has worked for me for years. It's a hassle, but saves me thousands each year. I actually got the taxable value of my personal home lowered $40K this year, which represented a 20% reduction! I was shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just have a house I can paint any color I want to without a landlord bitching at me. That is all.
I will never own it outright, you are exactly correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I still remember how great that felt.. and to be able to make a nail-hole in a wall
I must be a very simple person :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You're not. It's one of the old joys of "ownership"
Then again, we thought we would eventually pay off the beast lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. If you look at average home prices compared to average income
(somebody here posted the charts about 4 days ago) you will see that the price to income ratio was rock-solid consistent from the mid-19th century (as far back as they can find) until post-WWII when the banks really got control. It was about 3.5 - 4 years income to buy a house.

Look at today's "mid-crash" prices to income.

"If you want to control a man, give him a mortgage"

If Debt=slavery, then our debt based "economy" is still a slave economy, minus the overhead.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Technically, you are the owner even if you have a mortgage.
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 05:56 PM by ocelot
You hold title to the property, subject to the mortgage lien. If, however, you bought the house on a contract for deed, in that case you would not be the owner until you paid it off altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. It had to be said and who better than you to say it.
Home ownership and growing up have a lot in common, there's no future in either. All my old friends who grew up are dead, their worries made them old.

What with financing and the attractions of re-financing most will never own their homes and the only advantage they will have over renters is the choice of what color to paint the interior, not the exterior walls.

They will die in their traces pulling a plow through a field that they do not own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. you are the homeowner
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 05:58 PM by NYCALIZ
but the mortgage lender has a lien on it
just like when you buy a car with an auto loan, you are the owner but the lender has a lien

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The lender is raping the unborn just now, and trying to legislate making it legal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. If that was completely true, you wouldn't get the profit if you sold the home
And you wouldn't be responsible in any shortage from a home that sold for less than the mortgage amount.

I understand you point, but it is a very narrow view of the term "own"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. The term is "homedebtor"
Buying a house can be a wise move in many areas of the country. But in other areas, it is much cheaper to rent and foolish to saddle oneself with a $3000 house payment. Total ball and chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC