Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is why the right wing LOVES wedge issues...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:55 AM
Original message
This is why the right wing LOVES wedge issues...
DU is exploding because Hillary Clinton declined to answer a stupid question.

It never fails - the RW throws out these divisive issues and we all eat each other (in a morally-neutral way).

Remember when and how DOMA came about? Just prior to an election.

They do it again and again and again, and we keep falling for it. When are we gonna realize we're being played?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are better ways to answer the question.
But yeah, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think it was a fine answer
I don't want politicians to feel they're obliged to decide what is moral or immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Morality is the Basis of Law
The object of law is to prevent that which is immoral. Politicians need to have a firm grasp on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And there was no law
being discussed. It was a question that had nothing to do with the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. The real object of law is to prevent harm
Although there are certainly plenty of examples of laws which have been created to prevent activities which harm no one, yet run afoul of the prevailing view of what is "moral" in a society. The problem with that is that the concept of what is moral is too subjective. You can look back at past and current laws against adultery or consensual sodomy or interracial marriage and literally hundreds of other examples and find lawmakers trying to prevent that which was "immoral" in their minds. The true basis of law should be preventing harm, and being offended is not the same thing as being harmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I just think she could have answered it better.
Maybe taking the "equal rights for all under the law" while allowing people to hold "their own personal beliefs" type thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. IMO she should have said she didn't think it was immoral
IMO, she took what she perceived as the safest road.
It bit her in the a** and now she's playing 'catch-up'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember how the New Jersey decision DIDN'T cost us the election?
That's what I remember. I remember a lot of people screaming about it, and how it was just another Republican trick, and was going to cost us the Senate election and then *poof* it didn't happen quite like that. One person's wedge is another person's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and absolutely
nothing in Clinton's answer indicated she would deny rights to anyone. She refused to answer a stupid question, and rightly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am responding to your wedge issue comment, not to Hillary.
DOMA being a wedge issue is what I was responding to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. If the question was stupid
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 12:11 PM by Harvey Korman
it deserved a simple answer. One that she didn't have the spine to give.

Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. The fact that there are "mainstream" Democrats who believe that the
rights, equality before the law, and the very lives of millions of American citizens constitute a "wedge issue" is the most disheartening thing to come from this hideous matter. The idea that the calling of millions of American citizens immoral by definition, by a high ranking public/government official, would be thought of as something a Democratic "leader" need not address is sad indeed.

If Clinton has no opinion on this matter, she should not be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. except
she didn't say homosexuality was immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. No, she said "that is a question for someone else to answer."
I want every Democrat to answer that question, but especially the ones running for office. Saying that Clinton and others need not address Pace's statement is giving his statement the appearance of acceptance. If Clinton , when asked, just says, no comment, she is, by her silence, lending credence to Pace's words. Anyone who either can't see this or won't see this should not be president, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Thanks for laying this out so eloquently.
Excellent posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Bingo
By refusing to disagree with those who are saying that it is immoral, Democrats like HRC are essentially giving their implied agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Reminds them of their childhood
When they were constantly getting wedgies from the cool kids.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Is that why your ass is still so chapped? (nt)
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 11:53 AM by 94114_San_Francisco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. We Spell Out How Astroturfing Works...And People Still Fall For It
The right wing/Repugnican hate machine is still going full tilt...between the MOD to the astroturfed phone calls and guests on Washington Journal to what's the topic du jour on hate radio to building up a meme and buzz that dominates the late afternoon news and evening cable food fights. The Scooter pardon crap is a classic example...we even know who came up with the talking points (Barbara Comstock) and then you get stenographers like Andrea Greenspan saying how "a majority of American favor a pardon". It's all bullshit, but it still gets the grease.

But nothing gets their machine going than a good fight among Democrats. They've developed a whole litany of scenarios...from "tax and spend" to "cut and run" to "spat on the troops" and so on. And, be assured there's be some concern troll who will come here and try to stir up the shit.

So many times, I'm come on here and wonder who some folks here consider a bigger nemesis...the Repugnicans or the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Fuck that!
Pace stood up in public and called millions of American citizens immoral by birth (which is similar to the n-word, in my opinion) and all Clinton can say is "no comment"? These citizens are a huge and vital, contributing, percentage of the Democratic base! And she can't even muster up the gumption to say anything, at all!? And now Democrats who take exception to these events are being called politically naive and divisive?

Man, good luck to Democrats in '08 if the party doesn't change its tune...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. It doesn't matter if these citizens are a huge, vital part of the Dem base or not. They
should not be deemed immoral period. I know you agree with me, just pointing out the party they support (for the most part) should not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'd rather have courage than hide in a corner worrying about
being "played."

***Oh, the right wing is going to make this into a wedge issue, boo-hoo, the sky is falling, I have no guts or confidence, we're going to lose, boo-hoo-hoo***

PATHETIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You said it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. Absolutely! Why the hell can't people just sit down and shut up about civil rights?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. 'because Hillary Clinton declined to answer a STUPID question'
That is the point, it was an IMPORTANT question. And her answer mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
23. Human.Fucking.Rights. NOT A WEDGE ISSUE!!!!
Holy fucking shit, I can't believe I'm seeing this attitude on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. "homosexuality is immoral" = wedge issue?
Hmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. What, you hadn't noticed??
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 01:26 PM by Morgana LaFey
Of course it is -- for some people (homophobes). It divides the homophobes from the non-homophobes. That is the very definition of wedge issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. I expect her to be a leader, not a bowl of tapioca pudding.
She failed me as a leader. At what point will the Democrats take the fight to the Republicans? The GOP has been handing us our ass for the last 6 years. When will we get the gumption to up the stakes and take the fight to them?

I'm so tired of the equivocation by our leaders on every important issue of the day. Lead or get out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC