Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge may dismiss Ted Stevens case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:52 AM
Original message
Judge may dismiss Ted Stevens case

Judge may dismiss Stevens case
By Manu Raju
Posted: 10/02/08 10:41 AM


A federal judge is considering dismissing Sen. Ted Stevens's criminal case after government prosecutors violated a court order to turn over critical evidence to the Alaska Republican's defense team.

In a stunning beginning to a critical day in the trial, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan erupted at the Justice Department for waiting until just before midnight Wednesday to disclose FBI notes discussing Stevens's intent to pay for gifts that are at the center of his criminal trial.

"Why shouldn't I dismiss the indictment?" Sullivan fumed. "It strikes me this is probably intentional."

The judge said the two parties need to submit briefs to the court Thursday afternoon, and scheduled a 4:30 p.m. hearing to determine whether to dismiss the case.

A dismissal would mark a remarkable end to a years-long investigation into the actions of the longest-serving GOP senator in history, who faces reelection in November.

But Sullivan seemed to be leaning more towards imposing "lesser sanctions," like delaying the trial until the government provides all unedited FBI notes to the defense.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/judge-may-dismiss-stevens-case-2008-10-02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think declaring a mistrial might be more appropriate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. The game is fixed, as usual. The repuke DoJ fucks up (on purpose) and the case is
probably dismissed.

Should we be surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's what I was thinking. "government prosecutors violated a court"
Gee, who's running what around here!?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Why shouldn't I dismiss the indictment?"
Because he's guilty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm Shocked!
...That the apolitical Justice Department would blow a high profile case involving a Republican Senator!

What is the world coming to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't that be like excusing a bank robber because he
offered to give the money back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. More like excusing a bank robber because he's the prosecutor's cousin. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC