Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stevens Trial Suspended Over Possible Brady Violation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:05 AM
Original message
Stevens Trial Suspended Over Possible Brady Violation
Stevens Trial Suspended Over Possible Brady Violation
By Mike Scarcella

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan suspended the trial of Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens this morning, after it was revealed in court that prosecutors withheld FBI records that could have aided in Stevens’ defense. The senator’s lawyers at Williams & Connolly immediately called for Sullivan to dismiss the case.

The records in question showed that the government’s star witness, former VECO CEO Bill Allen, told federal investigators that he believed Stevens would have paid for the renovations he is accused of omitting on his financial disclosure forms if the senator had received the invoices. The government waited until last night to hand the records over, which Brenda Morris, the lead prosecutor, imputed to “human error.”

“It strikes me that this was probably intentional. I find it unbelievable that this was just an error,” Sullivan said.

At one point, lead defense attorney Brendan Sullivan turned to Morris and fumed, “Dismiss it!”

Morris conceded Stevens' lawyers should have gotten the records sooner but declined to say who on her team made the error. She said the omission had caused no harm because Allen was still on the stand. His testimony was scheduled to resume today before Judge Sullivan postponed the trial. Stevens' lawyers have not begun their cross-examination.

more:http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/10/stevens-trial-s.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. And these are the same people who usually scream "TECHNICALITIES!" when cases are thrown out
because prosecutors screw up. Bet you're glad you have the ACLU now, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. i hope they don't dismiss it!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Standard prosecutorial practice. Delay disclosure for as long as appellate courts will allow.
Yes an error, but harmless. Accordingly, no penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC