Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The bailout bill authorizes WAY WAY WAY more than $700 billion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:26 PM
Original message
The bailout bill authorizes WAY WAY WAY more than $700 billion
Here's the meat of the Senate bill regarding Hank Paulson's spending limits. What this language allows as I read it:

Unlimited power to buy troubled assets AS LONG AS the assets, once purchased, are churned back out onto the market and re-sold. The dollar limit in the proposed statute is not an overall lifetime cap on expenditures. It is simply a cap on outstanding expenditures at any given time.

Note well the phrase "outstanding at any one time," which qualifies all dollar references in Section 115. This was the objectionable, sky's-the-limit language in the original Paulson proposal and it is still here in the Senate Bill. There is language elsewhere in the proposed statute which requires disposition of assets at the optimal time (Section 113), but the timing of asset disposition is subject to the Secretary of Treasury's discretion-- and we already KNOW how these guys use their discretion. Also, FYI: Administrative Law 101: matters committed by statute to agency discretion are generally unreviewable by the courts.

Will the assets be resold at a profit? That is the multi-trillion dollar question. My guess? Not likely. The primary incentive established under the statute is to buy and immediately re-sell so that the $250 billion initial threshold under Section 115(a)(1) is never reached. Most of the "profit" scenarios that I have read about involve long-term holding of troubled assets until the market turns around. My best guess is that this statutory authority will be used to "buy high" (the government may be the only real market for some of these complex, impossible to value instruments) and "sell low" (who is going to want to buy (or has the $$$ to buy) BIG piles of this stuff that the market doesn't want?-- unless perhaps the buyer can put the toxic assets on a return trip through the bailout program:crazy::crazy::crazy:). The program was supposed to help overcome the problem of "fire sales"-- but I think actually this might promote both fire purchasing (buy NOW before the market collapses!!!) and fire selling.

Not that this is what will happen, but here's a scenario in which the $250 billion cap is never exceeded yet the program quickly costs taxpayers well in excess of $700 billion. Hank buys $100 billion in "troubled assets" every week, then sells those assets the next week for 10 cents on the dollar. Each time this happens the U.S. absorbs a $90 billion loss. In just 3 months, this could be a dead loss of a trillion dollars. And there would be plenty more where that came from.

:woohoo:But hey... at least we never had $250 billion outstanding at any one time!!! :woohoo:


SEC. 115. GRADUATED AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE.

13 (a) AUTHORITY.—The authority of the Secretary to
14 purchase troubled assets under this Act shall be limited
15 as follows:

16 (1) Effective upon the date of enactment of this
17 Act, such authority shall be limited to
18 $250,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time.

19 (2) If at any time, the President submits to the
20 Congress a written certification that the Secretary
21 needs to exercise the authority under this paragraph,
22 effective upon such submission, such authority shall
23 be limited to $350,000,000,000 outstanding at any
24 one time.


1 (3) If, at any time after the certification in
2 paragraph (2) has been made, the President trans-
3 mits to the Congress a written report detailing the
4 plan of the Secretary to exercise the authority under
5 this paragraph, unless there is enacted, within 15
6 calendar days of such transmission, a joint resolu-
7 tion described in subsection (c), effective upon the
8 expiration of such 15-day period, such authority
9 shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at
10 any one time.


11 (b) AGGREGATION OF PURCHASE PRICES.—The
12 amount of troubled assets purchased by the Secretary out
13 standing at any one time shall be determined for purposes
14 of the dollar amount limitations under subsection (a) by
15 aggregating the purchase prices of all troubled assets held.

pages 40-41


Once the troubled assets are sold off or otherwise disposed of, we'll be duly informed about how much money we lost in the transaction:

The Special Inspector General will conduct, supervise, and coordinate audits and investigations of the purchase, management, and sale of assets by the Secretary of the Treasury including by collecting and summarizing the following information:

<snip>

15 (F) A current estimate of the total amount of
16 troubled assets purchased pursuant to any program
17 established under section 101, the amount of trou
18 bled assets on the books of the Treasury, the
19 amount of troubled assets sold, and the profit and
20 loss incurred on each sale or disposition of each such
21 troubled asset.

page 64

http://senateconservatives.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/bailouttext.pdf

As per Section 120, the authorizations under the statute terminate December 31, 2009 (unless extended by the Secretary of Treasury).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can only imagine what kind of signing statement Bush will add..
if this goes through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. They added a bunch of additional pandering and may have made the original bill worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Many of the doomsayers said there would be an economic collapse and a fire sale
In which the top 1% would buy up almost everything.

Gee, guess where we are now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Authority not limited to mortgage-related assets
This bill, if enacted, could authorize the purchase (and resale) of all kinds of interesting assets. Once again, much is left to the Secretary's discretion, which is likely unreviewable.


SEC. 101. PURCHASES OF TROUBLED ASSETS.

14 (a) OFFICES; AUTHORITY.—

15 (1) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary is authorized
16 to establish the Troubled Asset Relief Program (or
17 ‘‘TARP’’) to purchase, and to make and fund com-
18 mitments to purchase, troubled assets from any fi-
19 nancial institution, on such terms and conditions as
20 are determined by the Secretary, and in accordance
21 with this Act and the policies and procedures devel-
22 oped and published by the Secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm despondent.
We just get shafted over, and over, and over again.

We live in a nation of haves and have nots. And the dichotomy just gets bigger with each passing day.

Fucking Italian politics is less screwed up than ours. (Disclaimer - I'm part Italian.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Plus the $120 billion in tax breaks.
Don't forget those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Tax breaks? For who?
I heard something earlier about tax breaks.

Who's getting them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Usual corporate suspects.
I mean, it stinks. AFAIK, the specifics aren't out. But...there won't be any surprises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. People who install Solar
Gets a tax break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Shoot-- I almost forgot about that
And it looks like any controls on corporate pay, golden parachutes and such are subject to numerous, easy to beat loopholes.

Thank God! The penthouses and polo ponies have been spared!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. One quick partial "fix"
At very least, the words "outstanding at any one time" should be stricken every place they appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Geez this thing just keep getting worse and worse.
Why don't they just back the semi-trailers up to Treasury and start downloading directly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. yet not once
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 01:35 AM by Snazzy
have I heard mention of that by anyone analyzing this (besides here on DU and maybe an obscure blog or two). And unlike Caribou Barbie®, I read a nearly scary and unnatural chunk of everything, heh.

Not a bail out at all. It's a revolving line of credit from the taxpayers.

Someone here pointed this out on the 21st, when I first wrote my congress people. Just fired off a new one to House people. It's in there three times in that section, not unintentional at all is it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. News media
The major news media outlets and talking heads on TV refer to this bill as authorizing expenditure of $700 billion. Even today's New York Times. Very frustrating. It is actually an unlimited authorization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. Assault with a blunt force, crossing fingers, thinking house will never vote it up
Really sounds more like they are trying play Russian-roulette rather than legislate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. Flood Congress with faxes, phonecalls, and e-mails.
This travesty can still be stopped in the House....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC