Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study pushes back origin of AIDS pandemic to 1908 - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:38 PM
Original message
Study pushes back origin of AIDS pandemic to 1908 - Reuters
http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnN01511884.html

CHICAGO, Oct 1 (Reuters) - The deadly AIDS virus first began spreading among humans at the turn of the 20th century in sub-Saharan Africa, just as modern cities were emerging in the region, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

The finding pushes back the origin of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by several decades, they reported in the journal Nature.

Researchers think the growth of cities -- and high-risk behavior associated with urban life -- may have helped the virus to flourish. There is no cure for AIDS, which is most commonly transmitted through sexual contact.

Prior estimates put the origin of HIV at 1930. But Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona in Tucson now believes HIV began infecting humans between 1884 and 1924.

more at link above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!
Anybody who has followed the etiological studies has to be dumbfounded by this. What a find!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pretty cool -
although the "plus or minus twenty years" line toned my WOW to just wow - since that essentially moves it back to 1930, which is what they've been saying for awhile now!

Still, very interesting science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. What? I thought it was a CIA plot!
The conspiracy wackjobs will have to go back to the drawing board for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That said, The River is really an ingenious piece of historical fiction
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 01:50 PM by alcibiades_mystery
Imagine if a fiction writer had come up with Edward Hooper's idea to present an alternative history of AIDS as if it were a documentary history rather than a complex novel. That would be some good reading. As is Hooper's novel. It's extremely interesting reading, but it is a novel, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Nah, they'll just ignore it. Inconvenient facts have no place in conspiracy theory! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for posting
I've posted this info before, with a range between 1909-1930, but too many people want to believe the conspiracy stories.

HIV is likely older than that, with sporadic transmission happening during the butchery of bush meat. Without cities, roads and transportation, outbreaks remained localized and very limited.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamarama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is at the same time fascinatingly interesting and disturbing....
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 02:27 PM by KzooDem
Disturbing that until the last 25 years, this virus has been mutating and changing. Going that long unchalleneged and unchecked may make it much tougher to find a cure. I don't know a lot about virus mutation and genetics, but everything I have learned about viruses is that they love to mutate and the longer they are allowed to do, the more elusive they become to methods to kill them. I hope I'm all wet on this assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC