Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new FDIC ceiling is just a new tax.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:50 AM
Original message
The new FDIC ceiling is just a new tax.
The increase in FDIC limits is simply a new tax on the general fund which directly benefits people who have more than $100,000 in cash to throw around.

I know that most people around here understand that, but I find it curious that the tax increase is being described in terms that do everything but identify a new tax on the general fund which will be used to benefit people with more than a hundred grand in the bank.

And, of course, those same beneficiaries, the ones with the cash, are are generally the ones who will benefit from the other tax provisions which will predictably find their ways into the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. But it's at least partically offset by higher rates paid into the FDIC
Ins. fund by all banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, but what insurance company is going to sell you insurance when
there's a hurricane on the horizon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Huh?
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:01 PM by high density
The FDIC is supported by its member banks. If it needs more funds in the short term to stay afloat then that seems like a decent investment to make. What we DON'T need are more runs on the banks like what brought down WAMU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Whether or not there are runs on banks, the taxpayers will
be paying more on FDIC-insured accounts as banks continue to fail. And the banks will be paying on the margin, subsidized by the timing of the ceiling-limit increase.

It's never a good deal to sell insurance when there's an accident in progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. The FDIC closes banks long before they are completely bust
When a bank fails they do have assets that can be sold to recover funds. People need to stop thinking of bank failures as 100% losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. So instead, we will increase bank insurance costs, that get passed down as fees..
to the people that can least afford it. I'm loaded, so fine by me, my accounts are fee free based on the amounts I deposit and hold. Keep funding my risk mitigation, suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not a good analagy. The Fed IS the insurer in this case, however they
at least APPEAR to be operating like the insurance industry does, and assuming that although they collect premiums from all the banks, only a few will have to "file claims" so to speak. I think this increase, which I happen t othink should have been raised a long time ago, coupled with some of the other measures I've heard about today certainly will improve the current situation. Certainly some rules need to be changed and ALL the rules must be enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree that it's a good idea as far as keeping deposits stable, but
in the end it's likely going to be a tax burden.

Had the ceiling been changed long ago, like you said, then the premiums could have been adjusted accordingly. But in this atmosphere, a break-even premium is probably more than any bank is willing to pay (except the ones playing the books).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. This thing has aways been unnecessary anyway. If you had more than
100,000 to deposit, you would open other accounts in other banks & so on. It's a distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ditto, see my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. DON'T assume that all people do as you think they should!
I was just talking to my cousin last night. She mentioned her MIL who was recently widowed, and there's a family tiff, so there's only one person the MIL is speaking to and it's NOT my cousin & her husband. She mentioned that the lady had enough $$ to live comfortably since she's already 85yo. Then she went on to say that the lady had $199,000 in one CHECKING ACCOUNT!!!!! and $225,000 in a CHECKING ACCOUNT!!! at another bank. I emphasize ch. acct. because I honestly didn't realize any individual would ever keep THAT much $$ in a checking account when their lifestyle didn't require large daily or monthly expenditures! I cautioned my cousin to contact the person who still speaks with the MIL and move that $100,000+ out of those accounts and into at least another two banks!

If you watched your TV just after that Calif. bank croaked, they interviewed quite a few people, standing in line outside that bank, close to tears, and some crying, because they didn't realize that only their 1st $100,000 was insured!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just what percentage of the American people have more than
$100,000 in the bank? If you have $300,000 you can spread it around in different banks. There is something fishy about the increase to $250,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Check my post #13. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. It reminds me of Hillary on CNN.
No, not THAT Hillary. I don't know her last name, but she is a frequent guest on Larry King Live, giving the Democratic point of view.

It's not the situation you mention, but in the same vein, where you can look at something differently. She mentioned how a tax credit, or tax break, or tax loophole, is basically a giveaway anyway. Just like now, this bailout bill will probably pass; before it wouldn't pass because of the amount of taxpayer money given away, but it will probably get passed now, because it includes tax reductions.

Do people not realize they are basically one in the same? When you aren't taxing appropriately, you are basically giving them a taxpayer bailout anyway.

I'm probably not making sense, because I'm having one of my headaches so I'm in my "foggy" mood, and can't express myself clearly. Hillary on CNN made a much better point, and I am surprised I don't hear more people making that same point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. but if we help those rich people
maybe they won't kick us when they walk by our good sleeping spot in the doorway of the abandoned building on main street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagoexpat Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. U kiddies & the RW maggots had ur say a coupla days ago, it's time for the grown ups to apply the
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:18 PM by chicagoexpat
medicine.

For those of us who know how to make hard choices in a bad situation.

No small business or small town needs a bank account of over $100,000, do they, they all operate out of a mattress like u do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Being a grown-up and all...do you think you could manage to actually type out 3 letter words?
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:21 PM by Marrah_G
Or is that just to difficult?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagoexpat Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Naw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC