...what a nasty, disgusting, evil and completely abhorent line of crap.
Only I heard it on local AM Hate Radio, yesterday, repeated 3 or 4 times. That peculiarly porcine congressman from Wisconsin's 5th district, James Sensenbrenner, made sure to mention it on a morning call-in show, and his colleague from Wisconsin's 1st district, Paul Ryan, emphasized it again, in the afternoon Daily Hate Minutes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_HateTim Wise had the same reaction you did, yesterday on Counterpunch:
If hypocrisy were currency, conservatives would be able to single-handedly bail out the nation's free-falling financial system in less than a week, without the rest of us having to front so much as a penny.
So on the one hand, folks like this always tell others--especially the poor and people of color--to take "personal responsibility" for their lives, and not to blame outside factors (like racism, or the economic system) for their problems. But on the other hand, these same persons then demonstrate that their own ability to blame others for their personal setbacks, or the nation's problems, knows no rival...
First, we have Neil Cavuto of Fox News, followed by Rush Limbaugh a few days later, along with smaller-market talk radio hosts and commentators, insisting that the nation's current financial mess is not the fault of greedy investors, free-wheeling bankers, speculators and other assorted rich people taking advantage of a largely deregulated market for bogus investments. Rather, it is the fault of poor people and those who seek to serve their communities, and especially folks of color, and those who insist on such things as civil rights.
How so? Simple: according to these blowhards, laws like the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act, which seeks to steer investments to economically marginalized communities so as to stimulate economic development and reverse the longstanding process of racial and economic redlining, is the real culprit...
...the Community Reinvestment Act only applies to banks and thrifts that are federally-insured. This means that the independent mortgage brokers, who are responsible for half of all the nation's sub-prime lending--and who have been writing such loans at more than twice the rate of banks and thrifts--aren't even covered by the law. And make no mistake, it was the hand of the mortgage broker, more than any other, that precipitated the housing bubble. These are folks who were writing "stated income" loans (which means you don't have to prove your income, you can just tell them a number and get the OK), not caring about whether the borrower might default, since they were going to turn around and dump the loan at a profit, onto the secondary market, by pawning it off to investors who were gobbling up debt, betting on the further expansion of home values....
...On neither end of this equation were poor people to blame. The persons getting stated income loans were overwhelmingly middle class, perhaps hoping to keep up with the richer folks down the block, but certainly not the poor. Most poor folks are still renters, or just hoping to get a modest home. And let it suffice to say that none of the vultures snapping up the mortgage debt on the secondary market were poor, and very few were persons of color. These were affluent white people, willing to gamble on the potential misfortune of others. Secondly, the idea that loans to the poor or to moderate income folks could create this mess is almost inherently absurd. Fact is, the risk involved with loans to such persons is quite low. The amount of money lost, even when a low income family does default, is quite minimal...
...I'm trying to figure out how to make a sufficiently outraged act of protest, in reaction to this airborne, virulent threat to the mental health of my community.
Simply mailing in a letter of protest -- even having it first-class/overnight -- isn't going to end with any of those ass wads losing their jobs, or having to come up with any sort of apology.
Oops, Edit:
forgot to paste the link to CP.org:
http://www.counterpunch.org/wise09292008.html...Double Oops, 2nd Edit:
Didn't mean to overlook the excellent comparison:
"...Surely they could see that this was the same market strategy as the drug pusher, who sells cheap until you are addicted. Hmmm. You know, if you think about it, the predatory lending racket was exactly the same as Bush Sr.’s “War on Drugs” aka "Contra-Cocaine". Both were criminal conspiracies between government and business against America’s minorities, designed to steal their savings, enrich a few whites and make Blacks and Latinos out to be “dangerous” to the country....The conspiracy is much wider and deeper than most people realize.
Former H.W. Bush HUD undersecretary Catherine Austin Fitts, a partner at the investment firm Dillon Reed, has summarized it in a series of posts at Scoop:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0202/S00054.htmHer blog is here:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/features/RealDeal.htmlThe commentaries on the Housing Bill of 2008 and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits are especially noteworthy.