Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Who Voted No

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:36 PM
Original message
Democrats Who Voted No
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/09/29/democrats-who-voted-no.aspx

Democrats Who Voted No

A lot of holdouts from the safe-seat left, including three of ten members from Massachusetts (Delahunt, Tierney, Lynch), much of the Congressional Black Caucus (including John Lewis, Sheila Jackson-Lee, Barbara Lee, Bennie Thompson, and Bobby Rush). Also notable: Lynn Woolsey, a strong California liberal who is extremely close to Pelosi; Hawaii's Neal Abercrombie, another leading progressive; and Dennis Kucinich.

A surprise yes: Oklahoma freshman second-termer Dan Boren, son of former senator David Boren, and a Democrat in a very pro-Bush area.

Full roll call here.

Update: By commenter request, here one statement of liberal objection, from Lynn Woolsey:

"Where is the comprehensive economic stimulus package that will assist 95 percent of the taxpayers — a package that includes unemployment benefits, food stamps, infrastructure investment, and of course, foreclosure relief? Stability should come from the bottom up. We need an economic package that will allow those in foreclosure to pay their mortgages and stay in their homes, bringing value back to the mortgage-backed securities that are clogging the financial system. Why isn't Wall Street paying for the mess they created? By reinstating a one quarter of 1 percent surcharge on stock trades, we could raise nearly $150 billion a year from those who have actually caused this mess and profited from it. Finally, question three: With only three months left of this current Administration, why are we willing to even make available $700 billion to them? President Bush and Secretary Paulson have been wrong from the start on just about everything. If you think they will be responsible with this money, think again."

The linked article notes that Pete Stark--along with Woolsey and Barbara Lee, "arguably the most liberal lawmakers in what's arguably the nation's most liberal region"--also voted no.

--Michael Crowley

Full roll call here:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I called Lynch and asked him to vote NO.
I'm still not sure if that was the right call.

We'll have to see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I think it was correct in the long term.
This deal was just not right for us, and there are clear signs that it would have done nothing to stop the credit freeze.

It made for great political theater, and created a nice distraction for the people who are hoping to avoid blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mine voted no.
Heath Shuler. I called and said no blank check. I wanted strict oversight, penalties and no golden parachutes. I said don't rush into it, do it right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares?
The Dems delivered the number of votes they promised in order to get it passed.

The GOP failed to do what they promised to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I imagine people might want to check out how their reps voted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Oh, I'm sorry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kucinich voted no.
Don't even have to check. ;)

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He did. I would never expect less of him.
He's an angry little elf at times, but he's on the right side when the big issues are decided. Love the guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Dennis is one
of the few good guys left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Agreed...he has rarely let me down as my Rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. I don't care what any of the fear mongering dems say-- DK's vote was enough...
...to sooth any concerns I might have had about the WRONGNESS of this bail out bill. Note to the fear mongerers: Kucinich is just about ALWAYS on the right side of issues. Let history give you strength if you can't find it anywhere else. Dennis votes with your interests at heart, even when most of the rest of our "leadership" is selling us out as fast as they can.

If Dennis Kucinich voted against this bill, it was a turkey that deserved to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Heroes One And All!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Once again, Kucinich is on the right side of the issue
Damn, we should elect that man president, he's not beholden to corporations, is intelligent and compassionate.

Wait, the Dems could never nominate a person like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. As expected, my alleged liberal rep caved and voted "yes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Mine voted "yes" too: Van Hollen, MD-8 >:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livelongandprosper Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. In short: assholes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Nope. This fucking bill was just putting lipstick on a pig
And selling us out at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. My leader Harry Mitchell voted 'No'
I've been very pleased by what he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. No was the right answer to this abomination. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Our congressman
voted yes against his constituents wishes. He's unopposed this election, but the local bloggers are already planning who will run against him next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here are the 228 NEAs
---- NOES 228 ---

Abercrombie
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Baca
Bachmann
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Becerra
Berkley
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Boustany
Boyda (KS)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Capito
Carney
Carson
Carter
Castor
Cazayoux
Chabot
Chandler
Childers
Clay
Cleaver
Coble
Conaway
Conyers
Costello
Courtney
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Lincoln
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
Delahunt
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doggett
Doolittle
Drake
Duncan
Edwards (MD)
English (PA)
Fallin
Feeney
Filner
Flake
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Giffords
Gillibrand
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Graves
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Hall (TX)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Heller
Hensarling
Herseth Sandlin
Hill
Hinchey
Hirono
Hodes
Hoekstra
Holden
Hulshof
Hunter
Inslee
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Jordan
Kagen
Kaptur
Keller
Kilpatrick
King (IA)
Kingston
Knollenberg
Kucinich
Kuhl (NY)
Lamborn
Lampson
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee
Lewis (GA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Lynch
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Mitchell
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Musgrave
Myrick
Napolitano
Neugebauer
Nunes
Ortiz
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Price (GA)
Ramstad
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Rodriguez
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Rush
Salazar
Sali
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schiff
Schmidt
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Shadegg
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Solis
Stark
Stearns
Stupak
Sullivan
Sutton
Taylor
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Tierney
Turner
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Visclosky
Walberg
Walz (MN)
Wamp
Watson
Welch (VT)
Westmoreland
Whitfield (KY)
Wittman (VA)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Dirty Dozen.
If 12 of those 95 voted yes instead of no, we'd be moving on to the Senate with this bill.

Of course, I see that the consensus at DU seems to be: let the economy crash, never mind who that hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yeah, and while we're at it
We'd better get Saddam right away before he sets off one of those rockets that can reach London in 45 minutes

We'd better privatize Social Security right away before it runs out of funds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. You would make a better case if you didn't lie about the intentions..
of those who opposed this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam kane Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Barbara Lee speaks for me!
She rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. My Blue dog rep (Herseth Sandlin, D-SD) voted no.
Must have heard from a buttload of angry constituents; she's usually pretty pro-business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. yea! Mike Thompson voted NO!!!
I am so happy! We were really adamant around here that this is not the solution. Now let's do some meaningful work. Although I see the bastards just printed 630 billion more (or whatever it is they do when the Fed announces they have issued 630 BILLION DOLLARS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, I say good for them.
We'll probably get a better plan because of it, with more taxpayer and homeowner protections. At least that's my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hooray for DeFazio!
Now let's get a "Bottom Up" solution!



... picturing a porcine Wall street banker "buns up" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wow, I don't think I've ever seen
Mark Udall or Marilyn Musgrave agree on anything before! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
31. They were absolutely right to hold out for more
...because the bailout as written benefits NO ONE but WS.

If we must bailout institutions who certainly know better than to get themselves into such financial trouble, then it should also include provisions that will actually help the economy by aiding struggling Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC